Goja caucana, Carrejo & Obando & Aldrete & Mendivil, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4903.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CF96683E-75B8-4AC4-90A2-20AD8CC2F14B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4431321 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C49710-FFEC-FFBE-598D-FB8FB38FFADC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Goja caucana |
status |
sp. nov. |
Goja caucana View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 12–22 View FIGURES 12‒17 View FIGURES 18‒22 )
Diagnosis. Forewing R2+3 unbranched, R4+5 four-branched. M eight-branched. Similar to species with hindwing R4+5 branched or not; M three-five branched, M4, M6 and M7 forked. A long spur vein in Rs directed backward. Hindwing Rs two-branched, M five branched ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12‒17 ). Anterior endophallic sclerites slender, slightly curved outward, directed anteriorly; posterior endophallic sclerites inverted U-shaped, outer arms acuminate ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 12‒17 ). Female IX sternum broadly oval, wider anteriorly, spermapore near the posterior border ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 18‒22 ). Similar to G. munchinquensis n. sp., from which it differs in that the hyaline areas of the forewing are of different size in both species (compare Figs 12 View FIGURES 12‒17 and 67 View FIGURES 67‒72 ), the branching of the forewing Rs are different in the two species, and the former has M with eight primary branches vs. M of three primary branches in the latter (compare Figs 12 View FIGURES 12‒17 and 67 View FIGURES 67‒72 ); also, G. caucana has a spur vein directed backward in Rs, and the hindwing M is five branched vs. absence of a spur vein in the forewing Rs of G. munchinquensis , and hindwing M of two branches. The phallosome is short, with the arms of the aedeagal arch curved, and the endophallic sclerites small and slender in G. caucana vs. phallosome long, with the arms of the aedeagal arch S-shaped, and the endophallic sclerites are large and stout.
Male. Color (in 80% ethanol). Body brown, with cream spots. Head brown, pigmented pattern ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 12‒17 ); genae ochre, postclypeus with striae little marked. Compound eyes dark brown, ocelli hyaline, with ochre centripetal crescents. Maxillary palps pale brown, Mx4 brown. Antennae pale brown. Thorax brown, pronotum pale brown, with brown spots; tergal lobes of meso and metathorax with dark brown spots, mesopleura with dark stripes. Legs: coxae, tibia and tarsi brown, fore- coxae pale brown, trochanters and femora cream. Forewings ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12‒17 ), brown, with hyaline areas as illustrated, pterostigma hyaline in the middle, veins dark brown. Hindwings ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12‒17 ), pale brown, with a yellowish hue, veins brown. Abdomen pale brown, with cream and ochre spots. Hypandrium brown, darker on sides; epiproct and paraprocts pale brown. Phallosome brown, with endophallic sclerites and aedeagal arch dark brown.
Morphology As in diagnosis, plus the following: Head: H/MxW: 1.58; compound eyes large, H/d: 4.69; IO/ MxW: 0.72. Outer cusp of lacinial tips broad, with eight-nine denticles. Mx4/Mx2: 1.02. Forewings ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12‒17 ): FW/W: 2.59; pterostigma: lp/wp: 2.20; areola postica wide, rounded apically: al/ah: 2.16. Hindwings ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12‒17 ): HW/w: 2.89. Hypandrium ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 12‒17 ), posteriorly concave in the middle, setose as illustrated. Phallosome ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 12‒17 ) with side struts straight distally, slender, broad basally, curved inward; aedeagal arch slender, with triangular posterior process and rounded apex; external parameres dilated, apically truncate, bearing pores. Paraprocts ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12‒17 ), oval, with a macrosetae near sensory field, and a distal setal field as illustrated, one macrosetae distally spatulate; sensory fields with 27 trichobothria on basal rosettes. Epiproct ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12‒17 ) wide, convex anteriorly, rounded posteriorly, one macroseta mesally, two lateral macrosetae, minute spicules and distal setae as illustrated.
Measurements. FW: 4150, HW: 3075, F: 1210, T: 1950, t1: 905, t2: 270, ctt1: 30, f1: 740, f2: 590, f3: 445, f4: 360, f5: 192, f6: 190, f7: 158, f8: 155, f9: 150, f10: 140, f11: 177, Mx4: 430, IO: 295, D: 295, d: 200, IO/d: 2.15, PO: 0.68.
Female. Color (in 80% ethanol). Body brown. Head ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18‒22 ) brown, with pattern dark brown and cream area around the compound eyes; postclypeus with striae little marked. Ocelli absent, compound eyes dark brown. Maxillary palps pale brown, Mx4 darker. Antennae pale brown, scape and pedicel darker. Thorax brown, pronotum pale brown; meso- metanotum pale brown with mesal line darker, pleura brown, sutural lines darker. Legs pale brown to brown, coxae with brown spot basally, trochanters and femora pale brown, tibiae with apical area cream. Forewings pale brown, veins brown. Abdomen brown, tergum ochre brown. Epiproct and paraprocts as in males. Subgenital plate brown. Gonapophyses and IX sternum pale brown.
Morphology. As in diagnosis, plus the following: Head: H/MxW: 1.66; compound eyes small, H/d: 4.27; IO/MxW: 0.70. Outer cusp of lacinial tips broad, with seven-eight denticles. Mx4/Mx2: 0.94. Forewings reduced to small scales, oval, almost twice as long as wide: FW/W: 1.94, with rows of macrosetae, veins not defined ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18‒22 ). Hindwings absent. Legs: tarsi without ctenidobotria. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18‒22 ) broadly triangular, apex slightly projected and rounded. Gonapophyses ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 18‒22 ): v1 long, slender, acuminate, surpassing v2; v2+3 wide proximally, with a short heel; distal process long, acuminate, with field of microspines, v3 with 10–11 macrosetae; IX sternum ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 18‒22 ). Paraprocts ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18‒22 ), broad, with abundant setae, sensory fields with seven-eight trichobothria on basal rosettes. Epiproct ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18‒22 ) elongate, rounded apically, anterior margin convex, with abundant setae, posterior margin with at least eight macrosetae and setae as illustrated.
Measurements. FW: 360, F: 1210, T: 1870, t1: 940, t2: 290, f1: 900, f2: 760, f3: 570, Mx4: 320, IO: 470, D: 300, d: 260, IO/d: 1.81, PO: 0.87.
Specimens studied. Holotype male. COLOMBIA. Cauca, National Natural Park Puracé, San Juan Termals , 2º20’23.4”N: 76º18’47.3”W, 3300 m., 13.V.2011. J. Mendivil. Beating vegetation and dead branches GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 1 female, same data as the holotype GoogleMaps . 2 males, NNP Puracé, Km 41, 2º19’44.4”N: 76º17’26.6”W, 3305 m., 7.II.2016. R. González. Beating vegetation and dead branches GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific epithet is a name in apposition that refers to the Department of Cauca, where the specimens were found.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |