Speleogona, Assing, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4507069 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:62C07F6C-F2DE-4CCD-AAD9-8CE1449843E9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487EE-FFD6-FFA9-FF6E-FE0EEA70FEDF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Speleogona |
status |
gen. nov. |
Speleogona View in CoL nov.gen. ( Figs 1-16 View Figs 1-9 View Figs 10-16 )
T y p e s p e c i e s: Speleogona cavernicola nov.sp.
E t y m o l o g y: The name is composed of the Greek words for "cave" (spelaion) and
"born" (gonos).
D e s c r i p t i o n: In general appearance (body size and shape) similar to species of
the genus Leptusa KRAATZ ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1-9 ).
Head completely anophthalmous, not even eye rudiments present ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1-9 ); genal carinae pronounced, in lateral view conspicuously angled ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1-9 ); maxilla with relatively short lacinia and galea; maxillary palpus 4-jointed, preapical palpomere rather large, almost 3 times as long as wide ( Fig. 5 View Figs 1-9 ); labial palpus 3-jointed, rather slender; ligula very long and slender, apically deeply bifid; mentum moderately transverse and of trapezoid shape ( Fig. 6 View Figs 1-9 ); labrum large, moderately transverse, with long whitish setae, and with weakly convex anterior margin. Antenna distinctly incrassate apically ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1-9 ).
Pronotum transverse, wider than head ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1-9 ); pubescence directed caudad along midline and diagonally latero-caudad in lateral areas; pronotal hypomera broadly visible in lateral view; prosternum with pronounced carina in the middle.
Elytra distinctly sinuate near posterior angles ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1-9 ). Mesosternum without carina; mesosternal process large and long, apically broadly rounded, almost reaching posterior margin of mesocoxae; mesocoxal cavities delimited from metasternum by fine carina. Legs moderately slender; tarsal formula 4, 5, 5.
Abdomen widest at segments IV-V ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1-9 ), segments VI-VIII weakly tapering; tergites III-V with distinct anterior impressions; tergite VI without anterior impression; tergite VIII without appreciable sexual dimorphism, its posterior margin truncate to indistinctly concave in both sexes ( Figs. 7, 9 View Figs 1-9 ); sternite VIII with weakly pronounced sexual dimorphism ( Figs. 8 View Figs 1-9 , 14 View Figs 10-16 ).
Ƌ: median lobe of aedeagus rather small; internal sac with moderately long flagellum, but without distinctly sclerotised additional structures ( Figs 10-11 View Figs 10-16 ); apical lobe of paramere relatively short, with two very long median and two short apical setae ( Fig. 14 View Figs 10-16 ).
♀: spermathecal duct very long and with numerous helical coils ( Figs 15-16 View Figs 10-16 ).
T r i b a l p l a c e m e n t a n d c o m p a r a t i v e n o t e s: Based on the morphology of the mouthparts and the tarsal formula, the genus is assigned to the Athetini . It is readily distinguished from all other athetine genera distributed in the Palaearctic region by the resemblance to the homalotine genus Leptusa, the pronounced and in lateral view conspicuously angled genal carinae, the complete absence of eyes, the conspicuously long and deeply bifid ligula, the large, long, and apically rounded meso- sternal process, the chaetotaxy of the apical lobe of the paramere, as well as by the dis-
tinctive morphology of the spermatheca.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |