Loboixyssibogae, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5699927 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-ED5E-3824-FF4D-FB05FE86F7D7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Loboixyssibogae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Loboixyssibogae sp. nov.
( Figs. 351 View FIGURE 351 , 352 View FIGURE 352 )
Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21395 ) , paratypes (9 intact ♀♀, MNHN-IU-2014-21396), and dissected paratypes (3 ♀♀, figured) from Diplosoma sp., south coast of Timor, Siboga Stn 296 (10°14’S, 124°5.5’ E), depth 8-36 m, 24-26 January 1900.
Etymology. This species is named after the “Siboga Expedition” during which the type specimens were collected.
Description of female. Body ( Fig. 351A View FIGURE 351 ) of ovigerous adult extremely swollen. Smaller young adult ( Fig. 351B View FIGURE 351 ) stout, but not as swollen. Body surface densely ornamented with minute setules. Prosome of ovigerous adult 1.57 mm long; dorsal cephalic shield bearing acutely pointed, paired horn-like processes posterolaterally ( Fig. 351C View FIGURE 351 ). Metasome with 2 or 3 dorsal constrictions, marking original articulations between somites; fourth pedigeroussomite (or fusedthirdand fourthpedigerous somites) greatly expanded, almost spherical, forming brood pouch. Free urosome ( Fig. 351D View FIGURE 351 ) small, inserted into ventral surface of prosome, 5- segmented, but posterior articulations indistinct. Genital somite 49×193 μm; abdominal somites covered with minutesetules, 36×167, 58×149, 33×138, and 73×135 μm, respectively. Caudalramus ( Fig. 351E View FIGURE 351 ) stronglytapering, about 1.8 times longer than wide (71×40 μm) and as long as anal somite, densely covered with setules; narrowed distal part pale and with thin cuticle: caudal setae not discernible from setules.
Rostrum ( Fig. 351F View FIGURE 351 ) aslongas wide, denselysetulose, weak, flexible, with rounded distal margin. Antennule ( Fig. 351G View FIGURE 351 ) stronglytapering, incompletely 7-segmented, 160 μm long; setae not discernible from setules. Antenna ( Fig. 351H View FIGURE 351 ) 3-segmented, consistingof coxa, basis, and unsegmented endopod; endopodal segment 2.9 times longer than wide (55×19 μm) and 0.7 times as long as basis: armedwith 6 setae (grouped as 1, 2, and 3) plus small terminal claw, one-third as long as endopod.
Labrum ( Fig. 351I View FIGURE 351 ) with broad convex posterior margin; posterior region soft, flexible, densely setulose. Mandible ( Fig. 351J View FIGURE 351 ) with 5 acute teeth and 1 small setaon coxalgnathobase: basiswith 1 medial seta: exopodwith 5 setae, outersetaeslightlyshorterthan others:endopodwith 1 and 4 setae on first and second segments, respectively; proportional lengths of setae on second segment 3:4:6:5 from inner to outer. Maxillule ( Fig. 351K View FIGURE 351 ) with 7 setae on arthrite, 1 each on epipodite and basis, 4 on exopod and 3 on endopod; coxal endite absent; 3 setae on endopod unequal (medial seta shortest and outer seta longest). Maxilla ( Fig. 352A View FIGURE 352 ) 4-segmented; syncoxawith 4, 2, and 2 setaeon first to third endites, respectively; basis with thick seta plus 1 small seta; endopod 2-segmented with thick seta on first segment and 1 thick and 2 shorter, thin setaeon second. Maxilliped ( Fig. 352B View FIGURE 352 ) as unsegmented lobe bearing 5 or 6 (commonly 6) setae mediodistally and ornamented with fine spinules on distal and outer surfaces.
Leg 1 ( Fig. 352C View FIGURE 352 ) with incompletely 3-segmented rami; inner distal spine on basis 15 μm long, bilaterally serrate; both rami ornamented with slender setules; second exopodal segment lacking outer element. Inner coxal seta absentin legs 1–4. Legs 2–4 with 3-segmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods ( Fig. 352D, E View FIGURE 352 ); secondendopodal segment of legs 2 and 3 with vestige of articulation: first exopodal segment lacking inner seta. Second exopodal segment bearing minute inner seta in legs 2 and 3, but lacking in leg 4. Legs 2 and 3 with same armature formula. Proximal 2 inner setae on endopod of legs 2 and 3 minute. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:
Coxa Basis Exopod | Endopod | ||
---|---|---|---|
Leg 1 0-0 Legs 2 & 30-0 Leg 4 0-0 | 1-I 1-0 1-0 | 1-1; 0-1; 2, 1, 3 1-0; 1-1; 3, 1, 5 1-0; 1-0; 2, 1, 5 | 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 2 0-1; 1, 2, 4 0-0; 1, 2, 2 |
Leg 5 ( Fig. 351D View FIGURE 351 ) represented by 2 small lobes positioned posteroventrally on somite; outer lobe tipped withsmall protopodal seta, and inner (exopodal) lobe tipped with 2 small setae.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. Loboixys sibogae sp. nov. differs from the type species L. ryukyuensis , in the setation of the first exopodal and endopodal segments of leg 1, each of which bears an innerseta (cf. absentin L. ryukyuensis ), the caudal rami are distinct (fused to anal somite in L. ryukyuensis ), the first endopodal segment of leg 4 is unarmed (cf. bears an inner seta in L. ryukyuensis ), and leg 5 is bilobed (leg 5 consists of 1 inner seta and an apparently bipartite outer lobe in L. ryukyuensis ).
The third exopodal segment of leg 4 of L. ryukyuensis is armed with 9 setae (formula 3, 1, 5), such a setation pattern is extremely unusual for a member of the Notodelphyidae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |