Santolina rosmarinifolia
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/a2013n1a8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C5-FFA2-4849-A620-FBB98FC8F90A |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Santolina rosmarinifolia |
status |
|
S. rosmarinifolia View in CoL L. var. genuina Pau ex Guinea
In Pau, Boletin de la Sociedad Aragonesa de Ciencias Naturales 6: 25 (1907) “ nom. inval., c.f. Art. 24.3 of the ICBN, McNeill et al. 2012 ”.
REMARKS
Pau (1891) wrote: “ Santolina canescens Lag. = S. rosmarinifolia L. genuina ”. The same author (1907) published “ Santolina rosmarinifolia L. genuina Pau pl. exs. (1905)” without rank and diagnosis (MA 126700: “Mancilla, V.1905, Pau ”). Other specimens from the locus classicus (PO 50776, 50777 [9.VII.1905], and E 00231985, MPU [8.VII.1905]) have different collection data. Guinea (1953) assigned it a varietal rank, whereas Carrasco de Salazar (1975) and Escriche (1975) confirm it. However, the epithet “ genuina ” is not validly published in accordance with Art. 24.3 of the ICBN ( McNeill et al. 2012).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.