Hippocampus histrix, Kaup 1856

Sara A. Lourie, Riley A. Pollom & Sarah J. Foster, 2016, A global revision of the Seahorses Hippocampus Rafinesque 1810 (Actinopterygii: Syngnathiformes): Taxonomy and biogeography with recommendations for further research, Zootaxa 4146 (1), pp. 1-66: 28

publication ID

http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4146.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:35E0DECB-20CE-4295-AE8E-CB3CAB226C70

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C42F37-0C77-7309-FF66-C8F9BF8EDDF7

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hippocampus histrix
status

 

H. histrix Kaup 1856 

English common names. Thorny Seahorse, longspine seahorse, spiny seahorse.

Synonyms. H. curvicuspis Fricke 2004  (in part), H. hystrix Kaup 1856  .

Distribution. Australia, China (including Province of Taiwan), French Polynesia, Guam, Hawaii, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mozambique, Micronesia, New Caledonia, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Reunion, Samoa, Seychelles, South Africa, South Korea, Tahiti, Tanzania, Thailand, Tonga, Viet Nam.

Syntypes. MNHN A-0906, RMNH 1537.

Type locality. Japan. 

Notes. Five of the eleven specimens used by Fricke (2004) to describe H. curvicuspis  were examined previously by the first author who did not find the cited morphological and meristic distinctions that purportedly separate these specimens from H. histrix  ( Lourie et al. 1999; Appendix G). In addition, one specimen (AMS IB.4155) in the type series appeared to be a member of a different species ( H. spinosissimus  ) (SL pers. obs.). The wide geographic range of H. histrix  (from east Africa to Japan) warrants further investigation, as Song & Mabuchi (2014) suggest that the genetic distance between Indian and Pacific H. histrix  is 6.6–6.7% (CO1) and this is also suggested by BOLD (2016) which indicates a 6.13% distinction between specimens from Mozambique / India versus Viet Nam / Japan (648bp CO1). This high degree of divergence indicates the presence of at least one cryptic species across the range. There are no genetic data currently available for H. jayakari  , which is morphologically very similar to but replaces H. histrix  in the Red Sea and Arabian Gulf  .