Hubbardiidae (Schizomida), 1899

Monjaraz-Ruedas, Rodrigo, Prendini, Lorenzo & Francke, Oscar F., 2019, Systematics Of The Short-Tailed Whipscorpion Genus Stenochrus Chamberlin, 1922 (Schizomida: Hubbardiidae), With Descriptions Of Six New Genera And Five New Species, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2019 (435), pp. 1-93 : 16-17

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090.435.1.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C2C43B-FF8E-434D-14A4-38FC70C148A7

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Hubbardiidae (Schizomida)
status

 

Key to Identification of the North American Genera of Hubbardiidae (Schizomida) View in CoL

1. Cheliceral fixed finger with two teeth between two primary teeth, serrula composed of blunt teeth; pedipalp trochanter without prolateral spur; tarsal spurs symmetric; pygidial flagellum cylindrical, not dorsoventrally compressed (♂), with five flagellomeres (♀); spermathecae (♀) with one pair of lobes and without chitinized arch....... ................ Protoschizomidae Rowland, 1975 View in CoL

– Cheliceral fixed finger with three or more teeth between two primary teeth, serrula composed of several hyaline teeth (fig. 12); pedipalp trochanter with prolateral spur; tarsal spurs asymmetric; pygidial flagellum dorsoventrally compressed or globose (♂), with three or four flagellomeres (♀); spermathecae (♀) with two or more pairs of lobes and chitinized arch (figs. 8, 9).................................2 ( Hubbardiidae Cook, 1899 View in CoL )

2. Pedipalp femur, prolateral surface with four setae (Fvr); opisthosomal segment XII (♂) with conspicuous posterodorsal process; spermathecae (♀) with more than three pairs of extremely short, broad, and rounded lobes, clustered in groups.............. ................................... Hubbardia Cook, 1899 View in CoL

– Pedipalp femur, prolateral surface with three setae (Fvr); opisthosomal segment XII (♂) with or without inconspicuous posterodorsal process; spermathecae (♀) usually with two or four pairs of long, filiform lobes, not clustered in groups (figs. 8–10)...................3

3. Opisthosomal segment II with four setae; pedipalp femur (♂), setae Fv 1 and Fv 2 forming spiniform setiferous tubercles; prolateral tarsal spur (♂) present; pygidial flagellum (♀) with four flagellomeres................. Mayazomus Reddell and Cokendolpher, 1995 View in CoL

– Opisthosomal segment II with two setae; pedipalp femur (♂), setae Fv 1 and Fv 2 acuminate, setiform or spiniform; prolateral tarsal spur (♂) absent; pygidial flagellum (♀) with three flagellomeres....................4

4. Cheliceral movable finger with lamella or teeth (fig. 12B, C)...........................................5

– Cheliceral movable finger smooth (fig. 12A).......8

5. Opisthosomal segment XII with small, inconspicuous posterodorsal process (♂); pygidial flagellum (♂) usually globose; spermathecae (♀), lateral lobes greatly reduced (usually absent) compared to median lobes, and usually with apical bulbs............................................................ Pacal Reddell and Cokendolpher, 1995 View in CoL

– Opisthosomal segment XII without posterodorsal process (♂); pygidial flagellum (♂) dorsoventrally compressed; spermathecae (♀), lateral and median lobes subequal, without apical bulbs................................6

6. Opisthosomal segments VIII–XI (♂) elongated (fig. 18 C) ; pygidial flagellum (♂) elongated with posterior constriction in dorsal view (fig. 19D–F); spermathecae (♀), chitinized arch mug shaped (fig. 8E, F).......... Heteroschizomus Rowland, 1973 View in CoL , stat. rev.

– Opisthosomal segments VIII–XI (♂) not elongated (fig. 15); pygidial flagellum (♂) elliptical or trilobed (figs. 19G–I, 23G–I); spermathecae (♀), chitinized arch wih lateral tips projected and acute (fig. 9A, B, F)..............7

7. Cheliceral movable finger with lamella (fig. 12C); pedipalp patella with five Pm setae, tibia setal formula 5-5-6 (fig. 14C); pygidial flagellum (♂) with pair of dorsosubmedian circular depressions, without projections (fig. 19G–I); spermathecae (♀), lateral and median lobes equal, with several apical sclerotizations in both pairs of lobes, creating appearence of leafy tree (fig. 9A, B) ............................................ Nahual View in CoL , gen. nov.

– Cheliceral movable finger serrate, comprising several small teeth (fig. 13I); pedipalp patella with four Pm setae, tibia setal formula 3-3-4 (fig. 14D); pygidial flagellum (♂) without depressions and with pair of dorsosubmedian projections (fig. 23G–I); spermathecae (♀), lateral lobes reduced to approximately 3/4 the length of median lobes, without apical sclerotizations in both pairs of lobes (fig. 9F)............................. ......................... Troglostenochrus View in CoL , gen. nov.

8. Propeltidium with three pairs of dorsal setae (fig. 11A)......................................................9

– Propeltidium with two pairs of dorsal setae (fig. 11B)....................................................11

9. Pedipalp tibia with prominent lateral spur; spermathecae (♀) with four asymmetric pairs of hand-shaped lobes; pygidial flagellum (♂) globose, with medial depression.................................. Sotanostenochrus Reddell and Cokendolpher, 1991 View in CoL

– Pedipalp tibia without lateral spur; pygidial flagellum (♂) deltoid/spear shaped (figs. 16D–F, 19A– C), with paired submedian depressions ; spermathecae (♀) with two pairs of filiform lobes..........................10

10. Pedipalp tibia, setal formula 3-3-5 (fig. 14B); pygidial flagellum (♂) bulbous/spear shaped, with paired submedian depressions not fused posteriorly (fig. 19A– C) ; spermathecae (♀), median lobes parenthesis shaped, apex laterally directed, median and lateral lobe bases aligned, chitinized arch U-shaped (fig. 9 C)............................. ............................... Schizophyxia View in CoL , gen. nov .

– Pedipalp tibia, setal formula 4-3-5 (fig. 14A); pygidial flagellum (♂) deltoid (fig. 16A–F), with paired posterior depressions fused posteriorly; spermathecae (♀), median lobes straight, apex vertically directed, median lobe bases posterior to lateral lobe bases, chitinized arch inverse arch shaped (fig. 8A)............... Ambulantactus View in CoL , gen. nov.

11. Pedipalps (♂) robust; pedipalp femur (♂), setae Fv 1 and Fv 2 forming spiniform setiferous tubercles, Fe 1, Fe 5, Ter 7 and Tir 5 spiniform; pygidial flagellum (♂) elliptical to lanceolate, with pair of dorsosubmedian depressions fused posteriorly; spermathecae (♀), lateral lobes swollen, drop shaped....... ............................ Olmecazomus View in CoL , nom. nov.

– Pedipalps (♂) homeomorphic; pedipalp femur (♂), setae Fe 1, Fe 5, Fv 1, Fv 2, Ter 7 and Tir 5 acuminate, setiform; pygidial flagellum (♂) ovate, subrhomboidal, or bulbous (figs. 16G–I, 23D–F), with pair of dorsosubmedian pits or depressions not fused posteriorly; spermathecae (♀), lateral lobes slender, filiform (figs. 8B, D)........................12

12. Pedipalp trochanter, apical process with bump (fig. 7C, H); pygidial flagellum (♂) subrhomboidal, and acuminate or lanceolate posteriorly (fig. 19A– C), with pair of shallow dorsosubmedian pits ; spermathecae (♀), lateral lobes at least 2/3 the length of, or longer than, median lobes, and with apical bulbs (fig. 8 C, D).................................. ................................ Harveyus View in CoL , gen. nov .

– Pedipalp trochanter, apical process acute or absent (fig. 7B); pygidial flagellum (♂) elliptical, cordate or bulbose, and not acuminate or lanceolate posteriorly (fig. 23D–F), with pair of deep dorsosubmedian pits or without dorsal depressions; spermathecae (♀), lateral lobes at most half the length of median lobes, and without apical bulbs (figs. 8B, 9E).....................................13

13. Pygidial flagellum (♂) ovate or cordate, with pair of dorsosubmedian pits embedded in dorsomedian depression (fig. 20B); spermathecae (♀), median lobes similar width to lateral lobes (fig. 10 C), curved laterally (J-shaped or parenthesis shaped) and sclerotized apically, median lobe bases posterior to lateral lobe bases (figs. 9E, 10 C)............ .................. Stenochrus Chamberlin, 1922 View in CoL

– Pygidial flagellum (♂) bulbous, without dorsal depressions or pits (fig. 16G–I); spermathecae (♀), median lobes broader than lateral lobes, slightly curved laterally and apically, and unsclerotized apically (fig. 8B), median and lateral lobe bases aligned (fig. 10A) ............................................ Baalrog View in CoL , gen. nov.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF