Leberis diaphanus (King, 1853)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3667.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0A38BF2A-135C-4C57-B291-40C34DD54FB9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C287E2-4C5D-2B68-D7FB-61C1FD0FDD06 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Leberis diaphanus (King, 1853) |
status |
s.lat. |
(94) Leberis diaphanus (King, 1853) View in CoL s.lat.
Indian records. West Bengal — Mandal (1980) ( Alonella diaphana ).
Remarks. Valid species described from Australia ( King 1853a) and then redescribed by Sinev et al. (2005). This is a new, correct combination for Alona diaphana —see Sinev et al. (2005) and Van Damme et al. (2010).
Distribution. Tropics of Africa, Australia, Oriental zone ( Sinev et al. 2005). Very common in the Oriental zone ( Maiphae et al. 2005; Tanaka & Ohtaka 2010), but records outside of Australasia should be revised.
Leberis davidi ( Richard, 1895)
Indian records. Andhra Pradesh — Chandrasekhar (1998b, 2004 a, 2010), Karuthapandi et al. (2012); Manipur —Sharma B.K. & Sharma S. (2009a); Meghalaya —Sharma B.K. & Sharma S. (2011); Tamil Nadu — Raghunathan & Suresh Kumar (2002, 2009); Tripura —Vekatraman (1995b); West Bengal —Sharma B.K. (1978), Michael & Sharma B.K. (1988), Venkataraman & Das (1983), Venkataraman & Nandi (1997), Chandrasekhar (1998a),Venkataraman (1998c), Sinha & Khan (2000), Chandrasekhar & Chatterjee (2002), Khan (2003); General records— Fernando & Kanduru (1984), Sharma B.K. & Michael (1987), Murugan et al. (1998), Raghunathan & Suresh Kumar (2003);
Remarks. Dubious record. Leberis davidi s.str. is a valid Neotropical species originally described from Haiti ( Richard 1895; Kotov & Ferrari 2010). Most probably, Indian records of L. davidi belong to another Leberis of the L. diaphanus- group, instead of Neotropical species L. davidi . Confusion remains because Michael & Sharma B.K. (1988, p. 175–179) listed Alona davidi davidi and Alona davidi punctata as two Indian species of this group (later Leberis ), and they can be considered separate species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.