Tychobythinus antojandro, Hernando & Pérez, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5258.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:215983C1-EB21-4C23-A418-3206E88E0FCF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7777140 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C1A048-E201-0A23-B09B-51E6E5D1F82F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tychobythinus antojandro |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tychobythinus antojandro sp. nov.
( Figs 1–9 View FIGURES 1–6 View FIGURES 7–9 )
Type locality. Cueva GEV-2 (GEV-2 cave), 38° 01′ 51.42″ N, 2° 59′ 30.47″ W, 1092 m a.s.l., Sierra de Cazorla GoogleMaps , Santo Tomé, Jaén, Andalusia, Spain.
Type material. HOLOTYPE: SPAIN: ♂: “SPAIN, Jaén, Santo Tomé / Sa. de Cazorla, Cueva GEV-2 / 38° 01′ 51.42″ N 2° 59′ 30.47″ W / 16-10-2022, T. Pérez leg.”, plus red holotype label, ( MCNB) GoogleMaps . PARATYPES: SPAIN: 4 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀: same data as holotype, plus red paratypes labels, ( CHC: 7, PHC: 2); GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀: “ SPAIN, Jaén, Santo Tomé / Sa. de Cazorla, Cueva GEV-2 / 38° 01′ 51.42″ N 2° 59′ 30.47″ W / 2-10-2021, T. Pérez leg.”, plus red paratype label, ( CHC) GoogleMaps ; 2 ♀♀: “ SPAIN, Jaén, Santo Tomé / Sa. de Cazorla, Cueva GEV-2 / 38° 01′ 51.42″ N 2° 59′ 30.47″ W / 10-5-2019, T. Pérez leg.”, plus red paratype label, ( CHC) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Apterous and microphthalmic, with only 3 ommatidia, depigmented (reddish brown). Antennae and legs long and slender. Morphology of the aedeagus characteristic, with the endophallus composed of three structures: (1) two very long, stout, inwardly curved lateral spines (2) central, slightly sclerotised, Y-shaped piece (3) cluster of variably sized stout spines, running along central part of the basal bulb.
Description. Male. Body ( Fig 1 View FIGURES 1–6 ) entirely reddish brown, maxillary palps, antennae and legs lighter; body length: 1.2–1.36 mm. Dorsal surface of body covered with long golden semi-erect setae, except disc of head and pronotum which are glabrous with some longer setae on lateral margins of head and pronotum. Head sub-triangular with tempora rounded, wider than long (0.25–0.26/ 0.21–0.23 mm), covered with dense, semierect setae. Frontal rostrum distinctly wider than long (0.1–0.12/ 0.07–0.08 mm); antennal tubercles well-developed, median depression narrow and shallow. Vertex convex, with distinct median ridge. Eyes very small (microphthalmic), with only three ommatidia. Maxillary palpi ( Fig.1 View FIGURES 1–6 ) short; palpomeres II and III with protruding tubercles; palpomere segment IV 0.19 mm long, pedunculate at base, widest in middle and narrowed to apex with dense, short, recumbent setae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Antennae ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ) 0.66 mm long; scapes much longer than wide (0.19/ 0.04 mm), cylindrical in shape, slightly curved at base and gradually widening towards apex; pedicel globular, longer than wide (0.07/ 0.04 mm); antennomere 3 slightly longer than wide (0.04/ 0.03 mm); antennomeres 4–8 spherical, (diameter 0.03mm); antennomeres 9 slightly wider than long (0.04/ 0.03 mm); antennomere 10 slightly wider than long (0.05/ 0.04 mm); terminal antennomere longer than wide (0.13/ 0.08 mm) and pointed at apex. Pronotum as long as wide, or longer than wide (0.28–0.3/ 0.25–0.3mm), about one and a half times as long as head and about the same width, or somewhat wider, maximum width at the middle; median antebasal fovea absent; lateral antebasal foveae well-defined, connected by well-defined, curved antebasal sulcus. Elytra almost equal in length and width (0.49-0.51/ 0.51-0.55 mm), slightly widened from anterior to posterior margin, twice longer (at suture) than pronotum; each elytron with two basal foveae; sutural striae entire, well-defined; discal striae absent. Abdomen slightly narrower than elytra; first two visible tergites (IV–V) equal in length. Legs long and slender; all tibiae simple; hind tibiae slightly curved in apical third; base of the profemora with a short series of tubercles on their internal margin ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Aedeagus ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–9 ) elongate, symmetrical; parameres long, narrow and sharply pointed at apex, with three preapical setae of different lengths ( Fig. 7a View FIGURES 7–9 ); endophallus rather complex and consisting of following structures: (1) two very long, stout, inwardly curved lateral spines ( Fig. 7b View FIGURES 7–9 ); (2) central, slightly sclerotised, Y-shaped structure, with both ends lobed and broadly paddle-shaped ( Fig. 7c View FIGURES 7–9 ); (3) cluster of variably sized stout spines, running along central part of the basal bulb to apical end of two lateral spines ( Fig. 7d View FIGURES 7–9 ). Aedeagus with evaginated internal sac has very different appearance ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 7–9 ), parameres folded inwards, practically touching both apices ( Fig. 8a View FIGURES 7–9 ), all structures of the internal sac projecting outwards, with the two large lateral spines perpendicular to the basal lobe ( Fig. 8b–9b View FIGURES 7–9 ), the Y-shaped piece projecting completely forward, remaining as the most apical part of the aedeagus ( Fig. 9c View FIGURES 7–9 ) and the central spine cluster folded downwards ( Fig. 9d View FIGURES 7–9 ).
Female. Similar to males but with wider antennal pedicel ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ); with palpomere IV larger, distinctly longer and asymmetrical ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ).
Differential diagnosis. By the morphology of the aedeagus, with the internal sac composed of three groups of symmetrical structures: the two very long and slender lateral spines, the Y-shaped central piece and the cluster of robust central spines, T. antojandro nov. sp. is comparable to the species of the Tychobythinus urgellesi group (sensu Besuchet, 1974). Further, this group is characterized by the dorsally flattened head, the relatively large frontal rostrum with the shallow median depression. The group is composed of three troglobitic and microphthalmic species: T. urgellesi , T. espanoli and T. muntani , all of them distributed and known from few caves in the northeastern Iberian Peninsula ( Bellés, 1984; Outerelo & Gamarra, 2006; Pallisé, 2021). T. antojandro sp. nov. is distinguished from all of these by the aedeagus with parameres longer and more acuminate, and by the different structure of the endophallus ( Figs. 7–9 View FIGURES 7–9 ). For illustrations of aedeagi of T. urgellesi , T. espanoli and T. muntani , see Besuchet (1974).
Etymology. The new species is dedicated to the kids and brothers Antonio and Alejandro Pérez, sons of the junior author (TP), who actively participated in the discovery and capture of this new species. The specific epithet was proposed by them and is composed by the combination of both first names forming the acronym “antojandro”; noun in apposition.
Habitat. The species was discovered in the G.E.V.-2 cave, with a total length of only 50 m and a maximum slope of 15 m. However, this small cave harbours a large terrestrial subterranean arthropod community, with 23 species recorded so far ( Pérez et al. 2020). These species include mainly troglophilic elements and few troglobitic species or species closely linked to the subterranean habitat. Probable cave specialist would include the cricket Petaloptila (Zapetaloptila) mogon Barranco, 2004 (Orthoptera) , known only from six caves in the province of Jaén ( Barranco, 2013), and the ant Aphaenogaster cardenai Espadaler, 1981 , ( Hymenoptera ) much more widely distributed in southern Spain, but, for the moment, only found in caves and shallow subterranean habitats ( Ortuño et al. 2014). Recently, a single specimen of this ant has been found in an epigean habitat, but this seems to be an incidental finding ( Rodríguez, 2022).All the specimens of the new species were captured under stones or wandering around a large column located in the central sector of the cave ( Figs 10–11 View FIGURES 10–11. 10 ).
CHC |
CHC |
PHC |
PHC |
MCNB |
Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Pselaphinae |
Genus |