Eupelmus (Eupelmus) subapterus (Ashmead) Ashmead, 2017

Gibson, Gary A. P., 2017, Synonymy of Reikosiella Yoshimoto under Merostenus Walker (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae), with a checklist of world species and a revision of those species with brachypterous females, Zootaxa 4255 (1), pp. 1-65 : 62

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.556479

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3EF97DA3-EF37-4D91-8689-2AB9151D1440

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6049241

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C187CB-2251-CF1B-FF78-FC0CFEBA4B20

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Eupelmus (Eupelmus) subapterus (Ashmead)
status

comb. nov.

Eupelmus (Eupelmus) subapterus (Ashmead) n. comb.

Figs 146, 147 View FIGURES 146, 147

Eupelminus subapterus Ashmead, 1901: 315 . Holotype ♀ (BMNH; type no. 5.970).

Type material. This species was based on a single female. The holotype is labelled “ Type [circular, red-bordered label] / Waianae Mts. | Oahu , 3000 ft. | Perkins, 4.1892 | beaten from trees / Sandwich [Hawaiian] Is., | 1912—215. / B.M. TYPE | HYM. | 5.970 / Urocryptus subapterus Ashm. ♀ Type / NHMUK 010353717 About NHMUK ”. It is minutienmounted through the mesoscutum to a card rectangle, is uncontorted, but lacks the right middle leg beyond the femur and the gaster ( Fig. 146 View FIGURES 146, 147 ); further, the left hind leg including the coxa is detached from the body and glued to the card, with the tarsomeres beyond the basitarsus missing.

Remarks. This species is more confidently assigned to E. ( Eupelmus ) than are E. guamensis and E. palauensis because not only does the pronotum lack a pronotal ridge but the dorsellum is convex over the scutellar apex and the propodeal plical region is comparatively long and has a distinct V-like depression similar to typical macropterous females of E. ( Eupelmus ). Unlike the other two species it also has mesotibial apical pegs. The original description is very brief and in contrast to this both the scape and pedicel of the holotype are yellow ( Fig. 147 View FIGURES 146, 147 ). Other diagnostic features include head not unusually modified, with frontovertex meshlike coriaceous ( Fig. 147 View FIGURES 146, 147 ); pro- and mesothorax dorsally quite shiny and finely meshlike coriaceous; mesoscutum broad and very shallowly concave posterior to slightly upcurved anterior margin and between low-angulate lateral lobes; fore wings right-angle bent at level of base of gaster ( Fig. 146 View FIGURES 146, 147 ) and tapered apically to angulate apex. The wings are glued over one another, but apparently the fore wings are uniformly setose beyond about the level of the parastigma and the venation extends to the apex along the leading margin beyond the costal cell. The original description states that the wings are fuscous with pale margins, but this may be an artefact of the wings being glued together; quite possibly they are hyaline or with only a slight yellowish tinge. The middle leg peg pattern is typical of E. ( Eupelmus ), consisting of 6 dark mesotibial apical pegs and dark mesotarsal pegs with those on the basitarsus in two rows.

NHMUK

Natural History Museum, London

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Eupelmidae

Genus

Eupelmus

Loc

Eupelmus (Eupelmus) subapterus (Ashmead)

Gibson, Gary A. P. 2017
2017
Loc

Eupelminus subapterus

Ashmead 1901: 315
1901
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF