Acanthiza uropygialis condora Mathews
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/313.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12777694 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C087C0-9EBF-10A7-FD17-488E0F52FAF5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Acanthiza uropygialis condora Mathews |
status |
|
Acanthiza uropygialis condora Mathews
Acanthiza uropygialis condora Mathews, 1912d: 78 (Leigh’s Creek, Central Australia).
Now Acanthiza uropygialis Gould, 1838 View in CoL . See Mayr, 1986b: 439, and Schodde and Mason, 1999: 206.
HOLOTYPE: AMNH 600897 About AMNH , adult male, collected at Leigh Creek , 30.31S, 138.25E (Times Atlas), South Australia, Australia, on 16 September 1910, by Edwin Ashby. From the Mathews Collection (no. 11632) via the Rothschild Collection. GoogleMaps
COMMENTS: Mathews cited his catalog number of the holotype in the original description; in addition to Ashby’s label, it bears Mathews and Rothschild type labels. A second specimen, cataloged by Mathews at the same time and entered as condora, is a paratype: AMNH 600917 About AMNH (Mathews no. 11633), male, Lake Gillies, South Australia, collected in 1902 by Ashby. The number ‘‘195’’ appears on Ashby’s label of the holotype and has been marked out. The number ‘‘573’’ was written in above it and that number also appears on Ashby’s label on the paratype. It refers to the number given this species in Mathews (1908a). There is an additional paratype in SAMA (P. Horton and B. Blaylock, personal commun.) .
SAMA |
South Australia Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Acanthiza uropygialis condora Mathews
LeCroy, M. 2008 |
Acanthiza uropygialis
Schodde, R. & I. J. Mason 1999: 206 |
Mayr, E. 1986: 439 |
Acanthiza uropygialis condora
Mathews, G. M. 1912: 78 |