Cincloramphus mathewsi vigorsi Mathews
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/313.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C087C0-9E0B-1013-FF46-4AB00A56F902 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cincloramphus mathewsi vigorsi Mathews |
status |
|
[ Cincloramphus mathewsi vigorsi Mathews ]
Mathews (1912a: 339) provided Cincloramphus mathewsi vigorsi as a new name for Anthus rufescens Vigors and Horsfield, 1827 , preoccupied by Anthus rufescens Temminck, 1820 . As such vigorsi has the same type as Anthus rufescens Vigors and Horsfield. Mathews (1912a: 339) did not designate a type for vigorsi; nevertheless, AMNH 587797, adult male, collected at Goulburn, New South Wales, Australia, in November 1890, by T. Thorpe bears both Mathews and Rothschild type labels that are marked with Mathews’ catalog number 7975 and the name Cincloramphus mathewsi vigorsi . I can find no evidence that this name was ever introduced as anything other than a replacement name, and the indication that the specimen is a type is evidently an error. I have retained this specimen in the type collection because it bears the type labels and was cataloged as a type at AMNH, but I have added another label to indicate its status.
Because Anthus rufescens Vigors and Horsfield is a junior primary homonym of Anthus rufescens Temminck , it is permanently invalid (ICZN, 1999: 59, Art. 57.2), and C. rufescens mathewsi Iredale, 1911 , becomes the next available name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cincloramphus mathewsi vigorsi Mathews
LeCroy, M. 2008 |
C. rufescens mathewsi
Iredale 1911 |
Anthus rufescens
Vigors and Horsfield 1827 |
Anthus rufescens
Temminck 1820 |