Apodacrina, Rohdendorf. Of, 1967
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15407/zoo2020.03.183 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6419226 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BFAB54-B00F-D776-A09D-94FBFB0B719E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Apodacrina |
status |
|
Key to genera of the subtribe Apodacrina
1. orb seta-like, numerous (10–40), arranded as a tuft in posterior part of parafrontalia ( figs 20, b–d). Vibrissal angle placed above oral margin, lunula in lower part strongly narrowed ( fig. 21, d). {: t 2 and often f 2 with a ctenidium consisting of strong thick spine-like setae ( figs 20, e; 22, e)................................. ........................................................................................................................ Xerophilomyia Rohdendorf, 1925 View in CoL
— Proclinate orb absent or arranged as a row with 1–6 setae. Vibrissal angle placed at oral margin, lunula in lower part not narrowed. {: legs without ctenidium. ................................................................................2
2. Proclinate orb absent or present as 1–2 fine setae (figs 13, b–d). Postpedicel 4–10× as long as pedicel..... .................................................................................................................................. Xeromyia Rohdendorf, 1925 View in CoL
— Proclinate orb present as 3–6 pairs of strong setae ( figs 1, c; 2 View Figs 1–2 , c). Postpedicel 3–5× as long as pedicel ( figs 1 d; 2 d View Figs 1–2 ). ...................................................................................................................... Apodacra Macquart, 1854 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.