Oreodytes Seidlitz, 1887

Okada, Ryohei & Alarie, Yves, 2020, Description of the immature stages of the endangered Japanese endemic Oreodytes kanoi (Kamiya, 1938) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Hydroporinae) and comparison with the known larvae of Oreodytes Seidlitz, 1887, Zootaxa 4820 (1), pp. 1-18 : 2

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4820.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AED07F7B-6F71-4CDE-A923-9AB3FD84FC7C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4397181

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF87FF-354C-FF80-76BA-F929B1BAFD83

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Oreodytes Seidlitz, 1887
status

 

Oreodytes Seidlitz, 1887 View in CoL (sensu novo)

( Figs. 1–25 View FIGURES 1–4 View FIGURES 5–6 View FIGURES 7–13 View FIGURES 14–18 View FIGURES 19–23 View FIGURES 24–25 , 28–29 View FIGURES 26–29 )

Diagnosis. Larvae of Oreodytes can readily be distinguished from those of other species of Deronectina described in detail (i.e., Deuteronectes Guignot, 1945 ; Hornectes Fery & Ribera, 2018 ; Nectoporus Guignot, 1950 ; Neonectes J. Balfour-Browne, 1944 ) (cf. Alarie & Nilsson 1996; Alarie et al. 1996; Alarie 1997) by the following combination of characters: body fusiform, narrow ( Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1–4 ); cephalic capsule distinctly constricted posterior to occipital suture; occipital suture present from instar I ( Fig 5 View FIGURES 5–6 ); parietale lacking pores PAd and PAe ( Figs 5–6 View FIGURES 5–6 ); temporal spines acute apically and strongly developed ( Fig 19 View FIGURES 19–23 ) (instars II and III); lamellae clypeales interrupted medially for a short distance ( Fig 6 View FIGURES 5–6 ) (instar I); antennomere 2 lacking secondary setae; antennomere 3 with a ventroapical spinula and pore ANf absent ( Figs 7–8 View FIGURES 7–13 ); primary seta AN2 inserted subapically, either lower or at about level of ventral spinula ( Fig 8 View FIGURES 7–13 ); maxillary cardo fused to stipes ( Fig 10 View FIGURES 7–13 ); primary seta MX 1 inserted on maxillary stipes ( Fig 10 View FIGURES 7–13 ); primary seta MX 5 present; prementum lacking lateral spinulae ( Figs 11–12 View FIGURES 7–13 ); legs lacking natatory setae ( Figs 20–21 View FIGURES 19–23 ); primary seta TR2 of trochanters present ( Fig 14 View FIGURES 14–18 ); spinulae present on ventral margin of tibiae and tarsi ( Figs 14 View FIGURES 14–18 , 20 View FIGURES 19–23 ); abdomen segments VII and VIII lacking bluntly rounded secondary setae ( Fig 22 View FIGURES 19–23 ); abdomen segment VIII strongly constricted posterior to insertion of urogomphi, and short, less than 0.20 times LLAS in instar III ( Figs 16 View FIGURES 14–18 , 22 View FIGURES 19–23 ); primary seta AB5 short, not extending beyond apex of siphon ( Fig 16 View FIGURES 14–18 ); urogomphus elongate, more than 1.9 times HW (urogomphomere 1 more than 1.1 times longer than HW) ( Figs 18 View FIGURES 14–18 , 23 View FIGURES 19–23 ); urogomphomere 1 at least 1.7 times longer than urogomphomere 2, with an additional pore and primary setae UR2, UR3, and UR4 about subequally distant ( Fig 18 View FIGURES 14–18 ), with secondary spine-like setae ( Fig 23 View FIGURES 19–23 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Dytiscidae

SubFamily

Hydroporinae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF