Rothaeina sequoia (Roth), 2023
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5318.1.5 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:161E8842-5DB1-40CA-A4B7-2287462D86E1 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8169900 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF87AB-E433-070C-09BE-F536605DFA21 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2023-07-18 06:58:16, last updated 2024-11-26 23:24:14) |
|
scientific name |
Rothaeina sequoia (Roth) |
| status |
comb. nov. |
Rothaeina sequoia (Roth) comb. nov.
Figs 50–52 View FIGURES 43–52 , 58–59 View FIGURES 53–59 , 80–83 View FIGURES 80–83 , 85 View FIGURES 84–86
Cybaeina sequoia Roth 1952: 197 View in CoL , figs 2, 4–5. Roth and Brown 1986: 2. World Spider Catalog 2023.
“New genus #1” Bennett 2005: 88, figs 22.10–22.11, 22.41, 22.43. Bennett 2017: 99, figs 23.10–23.11, 23.41, 23.43.
Type material examined. U.S.A.: California: Holotype male. Humboldt County, Pepperwood, 12.viii.1950, V.D. Roth ( AMNH).
Other material examined. U.S.A.: California: Humboldt, 1 ♁ 2♀, Carlotta , 15.ix.1961, W. Ivie & W.J. Gertsch ( AMNH) ; 15♁ 8♀, 5 mi. E of Carlotta , 20.viii.1959, W.J. Gertsch & V.D. Roth ( AMNH) , 25♀, 7.3 mi. E of Carlotta , 1.x.1959, V.D. Roth ( CAS) , 7♁ 2♀, Pepperwood , 12.viii.1950, V.D. Roth ( AMNH) ; 4♀, 2 mi. N of Phillipsville , 14.ix.1961, W. Ivie & W.J. Gertsch ( AMNH) ; 3♀, 5 mi. N of Scotia , 1.x.1959, V.D. Roth ( CAS) ; 2♁, 14 mi. W of Willow Creek , 21.viii.1959, W.J. Gertsch & V.D. Roth ( AMNH) ; 1♁, 18 mi. W of Willow Creek , 21.viii.1959, W.J. Gertsch & V.D. Roth ( AMNH) ; 1♀, Hwy 299 W of Willow Creek, 21.iv.1994, L.J. Boutin ( CAS) ; Mendocino , 1♀, 3 mi. S of Rockport , 300′, 19.ix.1990, D. Ubick ( CAS) ; Siskiyou , 3♁, 18 mi. N of Happy Camp, 22.viii.1959, W.J. Gertsch & V.D. Roth ( AMNH) ; Trinity , 1 ♁ 1♀, 4.5 mi. SE of Hyampom , 5.viii.1989, D. Ubick ( CAS) .
Diagnosis. The male of R. sequoia comb. nov. is distinguished by the combination of the patellar apophysis being distad with one large and several small peg setae at the tip and a prominent distal hump basally ( Figs 58–59 View FIGURES 53–59 ), the medial component of the retrolateral tibial apophysis being a very slender elongate rigid spine-like process ( Figs 58–59 View FIGURES 53–59 ), and the presence of several small barb-like hooks on the distal portion of the embolus ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 43–52 ). Differentiating the male of this species from the males of the other three species with known males ( R. jamesi spec. nov., R. mackinleyi spec. nov., and R. petersoni spec. nov.) is discussed in the diagnosis of R. jamesi spec. nov.
The female of R. sequoia comb. nov. is most likely to be confused with that of R. petersoni spec. nov.; distinguishing them from each other is discussed in the diagnosis of the latter species. Distinguishing them from the females of the other species of Rothaeina gen. nov. is explained in the diagnosis of R. beaudini spec. nov.
Description. As in diagnosis and description of the genus. Additional descriptive characters presented here. Abdomen usually lightly patterned.
Male (n=31). Distal component of retrolateral tibial apophysis ( Figs 58–59 View FIGURES 53–59 ) slightly extended anteriorly. Tegular apophysis ( Figs 50–51 View FIGURES 43–52 ) with basal proximal projection; distal arm large, relatively broad (length no more than twice width); proximal arm with simple ventrad, acuminate tip.
Measurements (n=26). CL 1.85–2.43 (2.18+0.15), CW 1.48–1.95 (1.72+0.12), SL 1.03–1.33 (1.17+0.09), SW 0.96–1.27 (1.10+0.07). Holotype CL 2.35, CW 1.83, SL 1.28, SW 1.13.
Female (n=47). Epigyne ( Fig. 80 View FIGURES 80–83 ) with single, small, medial transverse atrium. Vulva ( Figs 81–83 View FIGURES 80–83 ) broad, width usually four or five times atrial height (measured as height of epigyne from epigastric groove to atrium); copulatory ducts usually contiguous at atrium; spermathecal heads located short distance anterior of atrium; Bennett’s glands about midway along spermathecal ducts, usually obscured in dorsal view by a posterior loop of each spermatheca.
Measurements (n=22). CL 1.65–2.38 (2.09+0.17), CW 1.20–1.75 (1.56+0.13), SL 0.96–1.24 (1.15+0.08), SW 0.87–1.17 (1.05+0.07).
Distribution ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 84–86 ). Rothaeina sequoia comb. nov. is known from a small area of northwestern California, U.S.A., from northern Siskiyou County at the Oregon, U.S.A., border to southern Humboldt County. Although restricted in its distribution, collection records suggest this species was at least historically relatively common within that area with the majority of records occurring in the 1950s and 1960s. The most recent record is from the early 1990s and the conservation status of R. sequoia comb. nov. is currently unknown. Males have been collected in August.
Bennett, R. G. (2005) Cybaeidae. In: Ubick, D., Paquin, P., Cushing, P. E. & Roth, V. D. (Eds.), Spiders of North America: an Identification Manual. American Arachnological Society, pp. 85 - 90.
Bennett, R. G. (2017) Cybaeidae. In: Ubick, D., Paquin, P., Cushing, P. E. & Roth, V. D. (Eds.), Spiders of North America: an Identification Manual, 2 nd ed. American Arachnological Society, pp. 96 - 101.
Roth, V. D. (1952) Notes and a new species in Cybaeina. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 28, 195 - 201.
Roth, V. D. & Brown, W. L. (1986) Catalog of Nearctic Agelenidae. The Museum Texas Tech University Occasional Papers, 99, 1 - 21. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 142809
World Spider Catalog (2023) World Spider Catalog. Version 24. Natural History Museum, Bern. Available from: https: // wsc. nmbe. ch / (accessed 5 March 2023) https: // doi. org / 10.24436 / 2
FIGURES 43–52. Rothaeina gen. nov. species, males (43–44 R. jamesi spec. nov. holotype; 45–47 R. mackinleyi spec. nov. from Beaver Sulphur Forest Camp, Oregon; 48–49 R. petersoni spec. nov. from near Kyburz, California; R. sequoia comb. nov. 50, 52 from Pepperwood, California, 51 from Carlotta, California), left pedipalp. 43, 45, 48, 50 Genital bulb, ventral. 44, 46, 49 Tegular apophysis and embolus, retrolateral. 47 Tegular apophysis and embolus, ventro-retrolateral. 51 Tegular apophysis, retrolateral. 52 Distal half of embolus, ventral. DA—distal arm of tegular apophysis, E—embolus, PA—proximal arm of tegular apophysis, TR—tegular ridge. Unlabelled arrows indicate dorsal keel (45–46 single shafted arrow) and basal projection (43, 48, 50 double shafted arrow) of proximal arm of tegular apophysis and small hooks (52 dashed arrow) on embolus.
FIGURES 53–59. Rothaeina gen. nov. species, males (53 R. jamesi spec. nov. holotype; 54–55 R. mackinleyi spec. nov. from Beaver Sulphur Forest Camp, Oregon; 56–57 R. petersoni spec. nov. from near Kyburz, California; 58–59 R. sequoia comb. nov. holotype), left pedipalp. 53–54, 56, 58 Patellar apophysis and tibia, retrolateral. 55 Patella, dorsal. 57, 59 Tibia and patella, dorsal. Cy—cymbium, dRTA—distal component of retrolateral tibial apophysis, mRTA—medial component of retrolateral tibial apophysis, PTA—patellar apophysis. Unlabelled arrow indicates basal hump of patellar apophysis (59). Note: in Figs 53, 58–59 the distal end of the mRTA is a rigid spine-like process; in Figs 56–57 the mRTA terminates distally in a basally articulated macroseta.
FIGURES 80–83. Rothaeina sequoia comb. nov. females from California (80–82 from Pepperwood; 83 from Scotia), copulatory organ. 80 Epigyne, ventral. 81–83 Vulva (81 ventral; 82–83 dorsal). BG—Bennett’s gland, CD—copulatory duct, FD—fertilization duct, HS—head of spermatheca. Unlabelled arrows indicate atrial openings (80, 82–83 single shafted arrows), and ring-like loops of spermathecae (80 double shafted arrows).
FIGURES 84–86. Distributions of Neocybaeina gen. nov. and Rothaeina gen. nov. species (84 Neocybaeina burnetti spec. nov. and N. xantha comb. nov.; 85 Rothaeina beaudini spec. nov., R. jamesi spec. nov., R. mackinleyi spec. nov., and R. sequoia comb. nov.; 86 Rothaeina petersoni spec. nov.) AZ—Arizona, CA—California, ID—Idaho, MT—Montana, OR—Oregon, NV—Nevada, UT—Utah, WA—Washington.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
