Mystrothrips, Priesner. These, 1949

Mound, Laurence A. & Tree, Desley J., 2018, Asia-Australia distribution patterns among species of Mystrothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae), with two new species, Zootaxa 4526 (3), pp. 347-357 : 348

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4526.3.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:36B290D8-C78F-480C-9B55-67E8C9E55AA2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5951270

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BE3108-FFE3-FF9F-66CD-8E3CFA42AAA7

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Mystrothrips
status

 

Key to Mystrothrips View in CoL species

[* based on description]

1. Prosternal basantra well-developed ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1–8 ); antennal segment IV with 4 sense cones; antennal segments I–IV with one or more capitate setae.................................................................................. clavatoris View in CoL

-. Prosternal basantra weak or absent ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1–8 , 11 View FIGURES 9–15 ); antennal segment IV with 3 sense cones; antennal segments I–IV with apical setae all acute........................................................................................ 2

2. Antennal segment III with 3 sense cones................................................................... 3

-. Antennal segment III with 2 or 0 sense cones................................................................ 4

3. Postocellar setae with apices broadly expanded (Fig. 16)................................................. dilatus View in CoL

-. Postocellar setae finely acute............................................................ dammermanni group

4. Antennal segment III with 0 sense cones; compound eye with 3 facets ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–28 ); maxillary stylets about 0.3 of head with apart; inner apex of fore tarsus with minute recurved tooth in both sexes.................................... nomadus View in CoL sp.n.

-. Antennal segment III with 2 sense cones; compound eye of microptera with at least 7 facets ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ); maxillary stylets about 0.5 of head width apart; female without, male with or without fore tarsal tooth..................................... 5

5. Head smooth medially, without strong reticulate sculpture ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22–28 ).......................................... levis View in CoL *

-. Head with well-developed reticulate sculpture............................................................... 6

6. Maxillary stylets scarcely retracted anterior to occipital ridge ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ); meso and metanotal reticulate lines with many small tubercles ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–8 ); male without fore tarsal tooth................................................ brachystylis View in CoL sp.n.

-. Maxillary stylets retracted almost to postocular setae; meso and metanotal reticulate sculpture lines smooth (Figs 20, 21); male with small fore tarsal tooth....................................................................... reteanum View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Thysanoptera

Family

Phlaeothripidae

SubFamily

Phlaeothripinae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF