Cimbrochrysa Schlüter, 1982
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5433.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB9FD8C2-4B9D-44ED-87AD-198DC5E1F947 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10954735 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BDA81F-FF9C-FFDC-FF4C-29BBA815C7FD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cimbrochrysa Schlüter, 1982 |
status |
|
Genus Cimbrochrysa Schlüter, 1982 View in CoL
Cimbrochrysa Schlüter, 1982: 258 View in CoL ; Schlüter, 1984: 7; Willmann & Brooks, 1991: 126, 130; Willmann, 1993: 242, 244; Peñalver et al., 1995: 486; Nel et al., 2005: 67; Makarkin & Archibald, 2013: 127; Archibald et al., 2014: 191; Makarkin, 2014: 4; Archibald & Makarkin, 2015: 365, 366; Makarkin et al., 2022: 312 View Cited Treatment .
Type species: Cimbrochrysa moleriensis Schlüter, 1982 View in CoL , by original designation.
Emended diagnosis. Forewing: inner series of gradate crossveins arranged in strongly broken line; im pentagonal (length/width ratio 3.7:1); 2m-cu located nearly in middle of im; CuP with one branch; A1, A2 probably simple.
Species included. Cimbrochrysa moleriensis View in CoL from the earliest Eocene Fur Formation, Denmark; C. americana Makarkin et al., 2022 , C. major Makarkin et al., 2022 , both from the latest Eocene Florissant Formation, Colorado, U.S.A.
Remarks. The North American specimens were assigned to this genus due to the similarity of their forewing venation to that of the type species. However, the configurations of A1 and A 2 in the holotype are poorly preserved (either might be forked), and these veins are simple in the North American specimens. The angulate hind margin of the holotype forewing figured by Schlüter (1982: Fig. 1b View FIGURE 1 ) is false judging from its photograph; the holotype forewing is oval as normal for Chrysopidae .
The hind wing venation of C. moleriensis was not described, although it is preserved judging from Schlüter’s photograph (1982: Fig. 1a View FIGURE 1 ). The hind wing MA is proximally fused with RP in both American species ( Makarkin et al. 2022: Figs 9C, D View FIGURE 9 , 11C, D, 13C, D). However, this character state is not included in the genus diagnosis as its condition in the holotype is unknown .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Nothochrysinae |
Cimbrochrysa Schlüter, 1982
Makarkin, Vladimir N. & Perkovsky, Evgeny E. 2024 |
Cimbrochrysa Schlüter, 1982: 258
Makarkin, V. N. & Antell, G. & Archibald, S. B. 2022: 312 |
Archibald, S. B. & Makarkin, V. N. 2015: 365 |
Archibald, S. B. & Makarkin, V. N. & Greenwood, D. R. & Gunnell, G. F. 2014: 191 |
Makarkin, V. N. 2014: 4 |
Makarkin, V. N. & Archibald, S. B. 2013: 127 |
Nel, A. & Delclos, X. & Hutin, A. 2005: 67 |
Penalver, E. & Nel, A. & Martinez-Delclos, X. 1995: 486 |
Willmann, R. 1993: 242 |
Willmann, R. & Brooks, S. J. 1991: 126 |
Schluter, T. 1982: 258 |