Mimuloria missouriensis Chamberlin 1928
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5182058 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:481802B8-566D-4F7D-AA5D-B6CF9733C2ED |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BD8A28-FF95-FF8C-D599-BDB1FC902D65 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Mimuloria missouriensis Chamberlin 1928 |
status |
|
Mimuloria missouriensis Chamberlin 1928 View in CoL
Fig. 15 View Figures 9–17 .
Mimuloria missouriensis Chamberlin 1928: 155 View in CoL . Attems 1940: 490. Causey 1952: 106, fig. 6a. Chamberlin and Hoffman 1958: 38.
Nannaria missouriensis: Hoffman 1999: 367 View in CoL . Marek et al. 2014: 37.
Type specimens. Male holotype and two male and three female paratypes ( NMNH) collected by M. J. Brown on an unspecified date in 1926 in St. Charles, St. Charles Co., Missouri ; one male,
one female, and three juvenile paratypes ( NMNH) taken by the same collector at the same locality on an unknown date in 1927.
Diagnosis. Acropodite bending or arching strongly mediad; prefemoral process subrhomboid or triangular, without projections.
Holotype. Highly fragmented, length unmeasurable; maximum width ~ 4.5 mm. Somatic features agreeing closely with those of M. castanea with following exceptions. Facial setae not detected. Antennae reaching back to midlength of 3 rd tergite; relative lengths of antennomeres 3>6>2>4=5>1>7. Margins of collum slightly raised laterad. Anterior corners of 2 nd – 4 th paranota rounded; caudolateral corners of 5 th –19 th slightly extended. Relative lengths of postgonopodal podomeres 3>2>1>6>4>5. Coxae with one long, distoventral macroseta; prefemora, femora, and postfemora sparsely hirsute; tibiae and tarsi more densely so. Prefemoral spines short, only slightly overhanging femora. Tarsal claws spatulate on legs 1–9. Gonopods in situ and gonopod structure as in M. castanea except prefemoral process entirely triangular or subrhomboid and nubbin-like, without projections ( Fig. 15 View Figures 9–17 ).
Paratypes. The male paratypes agree with the holotype in all particulars.
Variation. The short, unadorned prefemoral process can be either triangular or subrhomboid, and these different configurations can also result from slight differences in orientation, as shown in our illustrations of the holotype of M. davidcauseyi ( Fig. 16–17 View Figures 9–17 ); the basal prefemoral spur is apically blunt in the former and triangular in the latter. Some triangular prefemoral processes of M. missouriensis are substantially larger than mere nubbins.
Distribution. East- and southcentral Missouri from St. Charles to Morgan cos. and traversing the Missouri River, an east/west distance of about 192 km (120 mi). North/south, the range extends around 96 km (60 mi), from the latitudes of St. Charles to Phelps cos.
Published records. Missouri: St. Charles Co .. St. Charles ( Chamberlin 1928, Chamberlin and Hoffman 1958, Hoffman 1999, Marek et al. 2014).
New samples and records. Missouri: Callaway Co., no further data, FF, 7 May 1969, W. W. Dowdy (FSCA). Cole Co., Jefferson City, M, F, October 1964, W. W. Dowdy (NCSM) and LePage Rd., F, 15 April 1965, W. W. Dowdy (NMNH). Morgan Co., Versailles, M, April 1959, J. N. Brooks (NCSM). Phelps Co., 9.6 km (6.0 mi) S Rolla, M, 11 October 1966, J. and W. Ivie (AMNH). St. Charles Co., St. Charles, 4 juvs., 1926 (NMNH).
Remarks. We retain M. missouriensis as a valid species because the gonopodal prefemoral processes lack projections. As previously mentioned, if the inner prefemoral projection of M. castanea were completely broken, the resultant configuration would be that of M. missouriensis . Consequently, we carefully examined all prefemoral processes for evidence of breakage and finding none, conclude that the unadorned structures in this species are genetically-based rather than reflecting dissection errors. Samples of M. missouriensis also cluster ( Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ) and its range is parapatric with that of M. castanea to the south; one would expect random occurrences of unadorned processes throughout M. castanea ’s range if the projections had been broken.
Attems (1938) reported M. missouriensis but completely missed F. castanea nor did he mention the latter in the Strongylosomidae volume ( Attems 1937).
NMNH |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Mimuloria missouriensis Chamberlin 1928
Hennen, Derek A. & Shelley, Rowland M. 2015 |
Nannaria missouriensis: Hoffman 1999: 367
Marek, P. & T. Tanabe & P. Sierwald 2014: 37 |
Hoffman, R. L. 1999: 367 |
Mimuloria missouriensis
Chamberlin, R. V. & R. L. Hoffman 1958: 38 |
Causey, N. B. 1952: 106 |
Chamberlin, R. V. 1928: 155 |