Bolostromus panamanus (Petrunkevitch, 1925)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5317.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A88A6184-36E3-4FDD-9BE0-862EC7361ED7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8153795 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BC87C1-FFCB-1457-96D5-3FC403A505C3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bolostromus panamanus (Petrunkevitch, 1925) |
status |
|
Bolostromus panamanus (Petrunkevitch, 1925) View in CoL
Figs 4–8 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 , map 1 View MAP 1
Ancylotrypa panamana Petrunkevitch, 1925a: 93 (Description female).
Bolostromus panamanus Raven, 1985 a: 130 View in CoL (Transfered female from Ancylotrypa View in CoL ).
Bolostromus panamanus Calatayud-Mascarell, Alonso-Alonso & Korba, 2021: 1017 View in CoL , f. 1A, C, 2A–H, 3A–C (redescription female from Costa Rica).
Type material. Female holotype from Wilcox camp on San Lorenzo river ( Peabody Museum of Natural History at Yale University) Examined by photo .
Additional material. PANAMA: Panama Oeste Province: Canal Zone , Barro Colorado Is., 1♁ 2♀, April–May 1942 (Zetek) Berlese ( MCZ92465 About MCZ ) ; Barro Colorado Is., 3 juv., 6.ii.1976, berlese litter, around rotting log, A. Newton ( MCZ 71162 About MCZ ) ; Barro Colorado Is. 2♀, 8.ii.1976, Berlese litter, under old tree, and vine fall, A. Newton ( MCZ) .
Diagnosis. Females most resemble B. holguinensis , but are distinguished from the latter and all other species by the following combination of characters: internal genitalia with short bifid spermathecae, with rounded lobes ( Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5 ); legs without a black pattern of coloration ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ); while female of the latter has their internal genitalia with short rounded spermathecae, without lobes (see Rudolph 1996: fig. 5) and legs with black pattern of coloration ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ). Males most resembles B. laheredia n. sp. but are distinguished by the combination of the following characters: tibiae I with two ventral spines ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ); eyes not on prominent mound ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ) and palpal bulb thin, embolus tip slightly sinuous ( Fig. 8C–E View FIGURE 8 ), whereas B. panamanus tibiae I with 4–5 ventral spines ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); eyes on a prominent mound ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ); palpal bulb globose and embolus tip curved apically ( Fig. 3C–E View FIGURE 3 ).
Description. Female (MCZ 92465): Total length: 4.57; carapace length: 1.83; carapace width: 1.43; carapace height: 1.03; abdomen length: 2.74. CEPHALOTHORAX: Carapace almost rectangular slightly wider medially, margin sinuous; pars cephalica dark orange-brown; pars thoracica light orange-brown, reticulate; cephalic groove not well defined, without pit medially; fovea broad, procurved ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ); caput elevated ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ). Clypeus height: 0.09. Sternum 1.19/0.87, orange, smooth; posterior sigillae oval, other sigillae inconspicuous ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Labium yellow without cuspule. Endites quadrangle; yellow with four cuspules; serrula not observed. Chelicerae dark reddish-orange; promargin five teeth and seven denticles; rastrellum with 10 spines. EYES: AME: 0.08; ALE: 0.1; PLE: 0.07; PME: 0.04; interdistances: AME: 0.01; AME-ALE: 0.02; PME: 0.2; PME-PLE: touching; LE: touching; ocular quadrangle: 0.41/ 0.44/0.14. ABDOMEN: Oval, dark gray dorsally and light gray ventrally ( Fig. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ). Spinnerets: median spinnerets: 0.21; lateral spinnerets: 0.34/0.29/0.37. LEGS: Leg I tibia and tarsi orange, femur and patellae and metatarsi yellow; leg II orange-brown, patellae to tarsi light orange; leg III–IV without pattern, uniformly yellow. Coxae I–II without inner short stiff setae. Metatarsi I with thin apical scopulae ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ); metatarsi II without scopulae; tarsi I–II with thin scopulae ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ); tarsi III–IV without scopulae. Tarsal claw teeth (19/23) (18/22) (2/2) (3/2). LEGS MEASUREMENTS: I 4.31 (1.40/0.65/1.01/0.73/0.52); II 3.69 (1.10/0.56/0.79/0.68/0.56); III 2.72 (0.91/0.47/0.47/0.46/0.41); IV 15.73 (1.37/0.77/1.15/0.78/0.50); leg formula: 4123. LEGS SPINATION: femur I–III (0); IV with 9 grouped pro-apical spines; patellae I 1v, II, IV (0); III 9p, 1r; tibia I 1-1v; II 1-1v; III 1d, 1r, 1p, 2vap; IV 1v, 2vap; metatarsus I 1v, 1vap; II 1-1v, 3vap; III 1-1-1-1d, 2r, 2vap; IV 2r, 1-1v, 3vap; tarsus I, II, IV (0); III 1-1v. GENITALIA: Spermathecae short and bifid, with small rounded lobes ( Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5 ).
Male (MCZ 92465): Total length: 4.04; carapace length: 1.94; carapace width: 1.53; carapace height: 0.89; abdomen length: 2.10. CEPHALOTHORAX: Carapace almost rectangular slightly wider medially, margin sinuous; pars cephalica dark orange-brown; pars thoracica orange-brown, reticulate; cephalic groove not well defined, without pit medially; fovea broad, procurved ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ); caput elevated ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ). Clypeus height: 0.09. Sternum 1.21/0.91, dark orange-brown anteriorly, light orange posteriorly, smooth; posterior sigillae oval, other sigillae inconspicuous ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ). Labium dark orange-brown without cuspule. Endites quadrangle; orange-brown with four cuspules; serrula not observed. Chelicerae dark reddish-orange; promargin five teeth and six denticles; rastrellum with nine spines. EYES:AME: 0.07; ALE: 0.13; PLE: 0.13; PME: 0.03; interdistances: AME: 0.06; AME-ALE: 0.02; PME: 0.26; PME-PLE: touching; LE: touching; ocular quadrangle: 0.41/0.42/0.19. ABDOMEN: Oval, dark gray dorsally and light gray ventrally ( Fig. 6A, B View FIGURE 6 ). Spinnerets: median: 0.21; lateral: 0.29/0.30/0.34. LEGS: Leg I–II femur to tibiae and apex of tarsi orange-brown, metatarsi yellow; leg III–IV femur orange-brown, patellae and tibiae lighter orange-brown, metatarsi half orange-brown and half yellow, tarsi yellow. Coxae I–II without inner short stiff setae. Metatarsi I–II curved, wider apically, with half apical scopulae ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ); tarsi I–II with scopulae ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ); III–IV without scopulae. Tarsal claw teeth (3/10) (3/9) (3/5) (4/5). LEGS MEASUREMENTS: I 5.94 (1.73/0.80/1.44/1.15/0.82); II 5.07 (1.48/0.71/1.21/0.92/0.75); III 3.61 (1.06/0.49/0.57/0.77/0.72); IV 5.48 (1.62/0. 63/1.39/1.14/0.70); leg formula: 1423. LEGS SPINATION: femur I–III 1d; IV 1d and 7 grouped pro-apical spines; patellae I, II, IV (0); III 5r, 1p; tibia I–II 1-1v; III 1d, 1r, 1p, 2vap; IV 1v, 2vap; metatarsus I–II (0); III 1-1-1-2d, 2r, 3vap; IV 1v, 3vap; tarsus I, II, IV (0); III 1v. GENITALIA: Palp: 0.97/0.40/0.85/0.40, bulb 0.43/0.21. Femur longer than tibiae, darker than other palpal segments; cymbium with four apical spines ( Fig. 8A, B View FIGURE 8 ); bulb narrow; embolus tip sinuous ( Fig. 8C–E View FIGURE 8 ).
Distribution. Veraguas and Panama Oeste Province in Panama.
Note. Calatayud-Mascarell et al. (2021) redescribed B. panamanus based on a female from Costa Rica, about 170km away. They present illustrations of three females identified as B. panamanus ( Calatayud-Mascarell et al. 2021; fig. 3). One female from Coclé, Panama redrawn from Indicatti 2007, one female from Costa Rica, Limon Province, and the type specimen of the species from Chiriquí, Panama (examined by photo). They also mentioned that B. panamanus could constitute a complex of species rather than a single one. The female and male presented here were collected in Barro Colorado Island, and the female genitalia specifically matches with the female holotype genitalia (see Calatayud-Mascarell et al. 2021; fig. 3c). B. panamanus internal genitalia consist of a short spermathecae with rounded lobes, while the other two present rather elongated spermathecae with elongated inner lobes (see Calatayud-Mascarell et al. 2021; fig. 3a, b). Consequently, there is a possibility that the specimen presented by Calatayud-Mascarell et al. (2021) represents a new and different species. To be noted that the type locality is situated in the Veraguas province, and not in the Chiriquí province ( Griscom 1924).
MCZ |
Museum of Comparative Zoology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Bolostromus panamanus (Petrunkevitch, 1925)
Dupérré, Nadine 2023 |
Bolostromus panamanus
Calatayud-Mascarell, A. & Alonso-Alonso, P. & Korba, J. 2021: 1017 |