Peraeospinosus acruxi, Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.178692 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7604A52C-F935-459C-91DD-F7C7AD9F2CC6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BAA970-6A1A-F522-FF06-FF148FF3FB30 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Peraeospinosus acruxi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Peraeospinosus acruxi View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 23-25 View FIGURE 23 View FIGURE 24 View FIGURE 25 )
Material examined: Holotype: one female, ( K 41347 View Materials ), ANT XXII /3 , PS 67/74-5, 71°18.35'S – 71°18.28'S, 13°57.71'– 13°57.31'W, depth 1030–1040 m, epibenthos sledge, 20 Feb 2005 GoogleMaps ; Paratypes: two females, two mancae, ( K 41349 View Materials ), the same locality; one manca, ( K 41348 View Materials ), ANT XXII/3 , PS 67/153-7, 63°19.31'S – 63°19.15'S, 64°36.94'– 64°37.18' W, depth 2092–2118 m, epibenthic sledge, 29 Mar 2005 GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis: Body long, about ten times as long as wide; carapace smooth, not swollen, 1.2 times as long as wide, 1.5 times as long as pereonite-1. Pereonites 2–3 rectangular; pereonite-6 short (1.7 times as wide as long). Pleon a little wider than pereonites, as long as carapace, over twice as long as pereonite-6; pleotelson rectangular. Antennule article-3 twice as long as article-2. Propodus of pereopod-2 length:width ratio 4.8: pereopods 4–6 merus and carpus with microtrichae; distal setae on pereopod-6 propodus well-calcified, just as long as dactylus. Pleopods normally developed. Uropod exopod slightly longer than endopod.
Etymology: Acrux is the biggest star in the constellation ‘The Southern Cross’.
Description: Female holotype body length 5.7 mm. Body ten times as long as wide. Pereonite-1 about as long as wide, tapering distally; pereonites 2–4 longer than wide ( Fig. 23A,B View FIGURE 23 ), narrower in the middle and wider at proximal and distal margin; pereonite-5 as long as wide; pereonite-6 1.7 as wide as long. Pleon as long as carapace, a little wider than pereonites; all pleonites the same size; pleotelson rectangular.
Antennule ( Fig. 24A View FIGURE 24 ): three-articled; article-1 stout, about 1.3 times as long as articles 2 and 3 combined, with two groups of pinnate setae and two simple setae along article; article-2 half as long as article-3, with two simple and one pinnate setae distally; article-3 with three apical setae.
Antenna ( Fig. 24B View FIGURE 24 ): Article-2 twice as long as article-3, with one simple seta; article-4 eight times as long as wide, less than twice as long as article-5, with three minute setae distally; article-5 with one simple seta distally; article-6 very short, with six terminal setae.
Mouth parts: Labrum lost during dissection. Mandible ( Fig. 24C,D View FIGURE 24 ) stout; molar process well-developed, with strongly crenulated edges, bunch of small spines at “lower” margin; lacinia mobilis well-developed, crenulated. Maxillule ( Fig. 24E View FIGURE 24 ) endite longer than palp, with eight apical spiniform setae; two of them are semi-fused; palp with two terminal setae. Maxilla ( Fig. 24F View FIGURE 24 ) semi-triangular. Lobes of labium ( Fig. 24G View FIGURE 24 ) poorly separated and setose in distal parts; outer lobe with row of short setae along outer margin. Maxilliped ( Fig. 24H View FIGURE 24 ): coxa reduced; basis fused into heart-shaped plate, as long as wide, with seta reaching half of endites; endite with two simple setae and two small tubercles distally; palp article-1 naked; article-2 wedgeshaped, with two weakly serrated and one strongly serrated setae on inner margin and one minute seta on outer margin; article-3 trapezoidal, with two weakly serrated and two simple setae on inner margin; article-4 slender, with one simple seta on outer margin and five weakly serrated setae distally. Epignath ( Fig. 24I View FIGURE 24 ) curved, distally simple.
Cheliped ( Fig. 25A View FIGURE 25 ): Basis robust, slightly rounded, twice as long as wide; merus wedge-shaped, with one rod seta; carpus with row of eight small rod setae dorsally and two rod setae ventrally; propodus with seta near fixed finger insertion; fixed finger (propodus projection) tipped with a strong spine, with well-calcified inner margin, and with three setae dorsally and two setae ventrally; dactylus slightly curved, with one short rod seta proximally on dorsal margin.
Pereopod-1 ( Fig. 25B View FIGURE 25 ): Slender (walking type); basis with five short setae along article; ischium short with one seta; merus 1.25 times as long as propodus, with two setae distally; carpus with one simple and two rod setae (dorsal seta long); merus and carpus combined longer than propodus; propodus length: width ratio 7, with one rod setae distally and one minute spiniform seta ventrally; dactylus less than half of unguis length, with long seta.
Pereopod-2 ( Fig. 25C View FIGURE 25 ): Slender (walking type); basis little shorter than rest of articles combined, with three minute setae along article; ischium with short seta ventrally; merus little longer than carpus, each with two simple setae and thick spiniform seta distally; carpus with microtrichia; propodus little longer than merus and carpus combined length, with spiniform seta ventrally and one simple and one thick rod seta dorsally; propodus length: width ratio 4.8; dactylus with one simple seta.
Pereopod-3 ( Fig. 25D View FIGURE 25 ): Similar to pereopod-2, but merus and carpus subequal, merus with only one simple seta distally.
Pereopod-4 ( Fig. 25E View FIGURE 25 ): Clinging type; basis twice as long as wide, with one simple and two pinnate setae dorsally and one pinnate seta ventrally; ischium with two setae; merus almost as long as to carpus, with two strong spiniform setae on ventral margin; carpus with two distal tooth, one seta distally and large prickly tubercle covered by little spines and surrounded by dense row of well-calcified blunt spines ventrally; propo-
dus with two spiniform setae ventrally and with distal seta twice as long as propodus and dactylus combined length; dactylus tipped by weakly bifurcated unguis.
Pereopod-5 ( Fig. 25F View FIGURE 25 ): Similar to pereopod-4.
Pereopod-6 ( Fig. 25G View FIGURE 25 ): Similar to pereopod-5; propodus tipped by three terminal setae just as long as dactylus (two coarsely, one finely serrated).
Pleopods 1–5 ( Fig. 25H View FIGURE 25 ): Rami similar in structure; endopod with row of eighteen setae and exopod with row of six plumose setae on outer margin (length: width ratio of both exopod and endopod 2.7); clear gap between the most proximal and other setae in both rami.
Uropod ( Fig. 25I View FIGURE 25 ): Both rami one-articled. Exopod little longer than endopod; endopod with one pinnate seta at middle, tipped by two simple terminal setae and one pinnate seta; exopod with pinnate seta on outer margin, tipped by strong simple setae.
Distribution: Antarctic: Eastern part of the Weddell Sea and off Palmer Archipelago, at depths of 1030– 2118 m.
Remarks: Peraeospinosus acruxi n. sp. is the seventh species of Peraeospinosus recorded in the Antarctic. It can be distinguished from the other six species ( Peraeospinosus kerguelenensis , P. pushkini , P. emergensis , P. exiliremis , P. magnificus , P. subtigaleatus ) by its narrow carapace (longer than wide), by its pereonites 2–4 being longer than wide and by the long dorso-distal rod seta on the carpus of pereopod-1. From the list above, only P. emergensis has elongate pereonites and a similar rod seta on the propodus of pereopod-1, but it has also a round carapace, a more compact carpus of the cheliped (1.25 times as long as wide), a narrower propodus on pereopod-2 (width: length 8), and sixteen setae on the pleopod exopod. In contrast, P. acruxi has a cheliped carpus twice as long as wide, a compact propodus on pereopod-2 (width: length 4.8) and only six setae on the pleopod exopod. Similar elongate pereonites can be observed in P. magnificus , although that species has one long distal seta on the propodus of pereopod-6, while P.acruxi has all three setae shorter than the dactylus. Kudinova-Pasternak (1969; 1970; 1973; 1993) recorded P. magnificus at various localities in the North Pacific (off California, off Japan and Alaska), the South Atlantic ( Argentina), and the West Antarctic (Bransfield Strait) as well (see Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, 2005). That material is not available for study, so the apparently wide distribution of the species cannot be confirmed. However, it seems likely that Kudinova-Pasternak dealt with two (or more) species with distinct areas of distribution (North Pacific and West Antarctic).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |