Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0023 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4A98B5DF-EFB7-48B8-80BD-451FB915A243 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4577092 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BA87D2-E026-7A40-46C2-87F3FDB2FBC0 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 |
status |
|
Genus Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 View in CoL
Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902: 298 View in CoL (nom. nov. pro Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 View in CoL ).
Pinteria Varga, 1972: 134 View in CoL (type species: Pinteria croesus Varga, 1972 View in CoL , by original designation)
Schistoloma (Hololoma) Bartsch, 1916: 195 (type species: Megalomastoma quadrasi Hidalgo, 1889 , by monotypy).
Type species. Cyclostoma altum Sowerby, 1842 by original designation.
Diagnosis. Shell high conical to elongate oviform, sculpture mostly smooth, rarely ribbed, periumbilical keel present or absent, aperture rounded without any tubes or slits, operculum corneous, multispiral, the individual coils overlap with each other and fuse only at their centre.
Remarks. It is obvious that the Vietnamese members of Schistoloma can be divided into two groups. Namely, one with a periumbilical keel (S. cochinchinense, S. messageri ) and one without ( S. inermis , S. maydelineae new species). The presence or absence of this character has been used as a distinguishing mark on the genus level in other pupinid genera ( Páll-Gergely et al., 2015). In the Philippine members of this genus however, there is a continuous variability between those two types. Therefore, it is not suggested to subdivide the genus based on this character at the moment. The subgenus Hololoma Bartsch, 1916 is said to have a narrow slit in the upper edge of the aperture, but this character is not clear in the illustrations of Bartsch (1916). Even if a slight slit is present in some species, it might not be sensible to split the genus based on this character with our current understanding, especially because this is only the edge of the distribution of the genus, and it is unlikely that the nominal genus has an extremely wide distribution. Given the large geographical area and the simple shell, it is possible that the genus Schistoloma is a group of species with plesiomorphic characters, and therefore, not monophyletic. Keeled species might be phylogenetically closer to Tortulosa Gray, 1847 , than to non-keeled Schistoloma species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902
Páll-Gergely, Barna, Nguyen, Phi Khanh & Chen, Yansen 2019 |
Pinteria
Varga A 1972: 134 |
Schistoloma (Hololoma)
Bartsch P 1916: 195 |
Schistoloma
Kobelt W 1902: 298 |