MYLIOBATIDAE Bonaparte, 1835
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/1085 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B6B8E985-F1CF-4C10-BB00-602E5BF36C1C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BA87C1-FFEB-FFF3-C2B5-E7DACF2BB0A4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
MYLIOBATIDAE Bonaparte, 1835 |
status |
|
MYLIOBATIDAE Bonaparte, 1835 View in CoL and RHINOPTERIDAE Jordan and Evermann, 1896
Figure 13 View FIGURE 13 F-K
Many fragmentary myliobatid and rhinopterid teeth were collected in KEB-1 deposits. Often reduced to broken elongated teeth or hexagonal lateral teeth that constitute the usual tooth plate of these cruching taxa with pavement-like teeth, they mainly belong to the genera “ Myliobatis ” (abundant, large size; Figure 13 View FIGURE 13 H-J) Rhinoptera (abundant, small to medium size; Figure 13 View FIGURE 13 F-G) and “ Aetobatus ” (extremely rare but distinguishable by its lingually extended root; Figure 13K View FIGURE 13 ). Accurate species identification is hard from isolated teeth, especially when they are damaged. Hovestadt and Hovestadt-Euler (2013) largely refigured numerous fossils myliobatids and some rhinopterids, including those usually recorded during the Paleogene. The main result of such a comprehensive comparative study is that the absence of complete or partial pavement-like jaw does not allow for a confident determination, explaining why we left them in open nomenclature.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.