Eulimnadia texana (Packard, 1871)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.6620/ZS.2020.59-33 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B9FF46-E458-A20B-DC53-D570FC08FDE4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eulimnadia texana |
status |
|
Carapace length
According to the growth models in figures 2B and 3, the expected length in single-individual cups is 7.3 mm, while individuals of cup 15 reach considerably smaller expected lengths of 5.1 mm. The superimposition of growth curves in figure 2B shows that maximal carapace lengths are ranked according to population density 16 days after hydration. Both, standardized population density and modelled maximal lengths are best fitted using natural log regression ( Fig. 4A View Fig ). In general, expected lengths decrease while population density increases. Also, the number of growth bands increases while length increases ( Fig. 4B View Fig ).
Length at maturity
A number of Eulimnadia texana hermaphrodites started carrying eggs on 25 September (seven days after hydration; Fig. 3 View Fig ). Two of three hermaphrodites were mature in cups 1.1–1.5, six of nine hermaphrodites in cups 5.1 and 5.2, and six of 15 hermaphrodites in cups 10.1 and 10.2 ( Fig. 3 View Fig ). None of the clam shrimp in cup 15 were mature that day, implying a population density effect on earliest maturation time. Two days later, there was only one non-mature hermaphrodite in cup 15.
At earliest maturation time, average hermaphrodite lengths were 4.7 mm, 4.3 mm, 4.9 mm, 4.7 mm and 4.8 mm at 1.0, 4.4, 5, 10 and 8.2 inds/400 ml, respectively. On the same day, immature clam shrimp (hermaphrodites and males) of cup 15 yielded distinct average lengths of 4.1 mm. Nine days after hydration, hermaphrodites of cup 15 reached 4.7 mm (density: 13.43 inds/400 ml). At maturity, hermaphrodite length of different population densities cannot be statistically distinguished ( Table S5). These data suggest average hermaphrodite body lengths of 4.7 mm at earliest maturation time (n = 23; at 24°C), based on a resolution of two days.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.