Protodasyapha (Protodasyapha) hirtuosa ( Philippi, 1865 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5091.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D26ABC55-B26F-440C-8999-ADEF63BA6DA9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5849943 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B9C726-FFEC-363A-72EB-0845FB24FB08 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Protodasyapha (Protodasyapha) hirtuosa ( Philippi, 1865 ) |
status |
|
Protodasyapha (Protodasyapha) hirtuosa ( Philippi, 1865) View in CoL
Tabanus hirtuosus Philippi, 1865: 719–720 .
Tabanus View in CoL ? obscuratus Philippi, 1865: 720 (preocc. Walker, 1854). Syntypes. Two females (one in MNNC), Chile: Santiago. Hunter, 1901: 142 (cat.); Porter, 1902: 248 ( Chile spp.); Kertész, 1908: 266 (cat.); Stuardo: 1946: 69 (cat.); Philip, 1968a: 11 (tax., Philippi’s types).
Veprius rufopilosus Bigot, 1892: 620–621 . Holotype. Male (NHMUK), “ Chile ”. Kertész, 1900: 26 (cat., Silvius View in CoL ); Ricardo, 1901: 293 (com., Silvius View in CoL ), 294 (in key, redes.); Porter, 1902: 246 ( Chile spp., Silvius View in CoL ); Kertész, 1908: 179 (cat., Silvius View in CoL ); Surcouf, 1921: 144 (dist., Mesomyia View in CoL ); Enderlein, 1925: 315 (tax.); Kröber, 1930c: 236–237 (redes.); Kröber, 1930e: 139 (in key, diag.); Kröber, 1934: 231 (cat.); Fraga, 1937a: 192 (in key), 194 (com., dist.); Fairchild, 1956: 28 (com.); Fairchild, 1971: 4 (cat.); Moucha, 1976: 17 (cat.); Chainey, 1990: 305 (NHMUK types).
Syntypes. Two males (one in MNNC). Type-locality: Chile, Santiago .
Distribution. Chile: Región Metropolitana (Cordillera, Santiago); Región de O’Higgins (Cachapoal); Región del Maule (Curicó); Región de la Araucanía (Malleco).
References. Kertész, 1900: 54 (cat., Tabanus View in CoL ); Hunter, 1901: 141 (cat., Tabanus View in CoL ); Kertész, 1908: 249 (cat., Tabanus View in CoL ); Surcouf, 1921: 71 (dist., Tabanus View in CoL ); Kröber, 1930b: 169 (in key), 170 (redes.); Kröber, 1930e: 122 (in key); Kröber, 1934: 238 (cat.); Philip, 1968a: 11 (dist., tax., Philippi’s types); Fairchild, 1971: 4 (cat.); Coscarón, 1976: 79–82 (redes., figs. 1A–E, 2A–H); Coscarón et al., 1979: 303 (com.); Coscarón & González, 1991: 127 ( Chile spp.); González, 1993: 110–111 (sea. occ.); Fairchild & Burger, 1994: 30 (cat.); Coscarón, 1998: 349 (list, dist.); González, 1998: 466 (imm. sta.); González & Flores, 2004: 6–7 (mou. par., figs. 8–13); Coscarón & Papavero, 2009a: 35 (female, figs. 7A–H), 36 (male, figs. 8A–E); Coscarón & Papavero, 2009b: 32 (cat.).
MNNC |
Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Santiago |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Protodasyapha (Protodasyapha) hirtuosa ( Philippi, 1865 )
González, Christian R., Elgueta, Mario, Krolow, Tiago K. & Henriques, Augusto L. 2022 |
Veprius rufopilosus
Chainey, J. E. 1990: 305 |
Moucha, J. 1976: 17 |
Fairchild, G. B. 1971: 4 |
Fairchild, G. B. 1956: 28 |
Fraga, A. 1937: 192 |
Krober, O. 1934: 231 |
Krober, O. 1930: 236 |
Krober, O. 1930: 139 |
Enderlein, G. 1925: 315 |
Surcouf, J. M. R. 1921: 144 |
Kertesz, K. 1908: 179 |
Porter, C. E. 1902: 246 |
Ricardo, G. 1901: 293 |
Kertesz, K. 1900: 26 |
Bigot, J. M. F. 1892: 621 |
Tabanus hirtuosus
Philippi, R. A. 1865: 720 |
Tabanus
Philip, C. B. 1968: 11 |
Kertesz, K. 1908: 266 |
Porter, C. E. 1902: 248 |
Hunter, W. D. 1901: 142 |
Philippi, R. A. 1865: 720 |