Lasius umbratus, Nylander
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/syen.12522 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:016059BA-33C3-43B2-ADAD-6807DC5CB6D8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14047335 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B987A9-4368-FF98-FF5F-FBD5FC20D9DA |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Lasius umbratus |
status |
|
7. Species group of umbratus View in CoL (= Chthonolasius part 2/2)
( Figs 8J View Fig , 9J View Fig )
Constituent species (24): Nearctic (6): aphidicola [e], minutus Emery [e], nevadensis Cole [e], speculiventris Emery [e], subumbratus Viereck [e], vestitus Wheeler [e]; Palaearctic (18): balcanicus Seifert [e], bicornis (Foerster) [e], citrinus Emery [e], crinitus (Smith) [e], distinguendus (Emery) [e], draco Collingwood [], jensi Seifert [e], longiceps Seifert [], meridionalis (Bondroit) [e], mikir Collingwood [e], mixtus (Nylander) [e], nitidigaster Seifert [e], przewalskii Ruzsky [], rabaudi (Bondroit) [e], sabularum [e], tibialis Santschi [], umbratus * [e], viehmeyeri Stärcke [e].
Distribution: Holarctic.
Identification: Among groups of the flavus clade, most similar to those of carniolicus , flavus , and nearcticus in having relatively small eyes (vs pallitarsis ), stocky mesosomata (vs atopus ), and unreduced palpomere count (vs claviger group). Among these groups, identifiable by the following combination of traits: clypeus broad relative to head width (vs narrow, carniolicus group); eyes larger, with> 35 ommatidia, and underside of head with distinct, standing setae (vs with <35 ommatidia except L. alienoflavus and Lflavus which, along with most other flavus and nearcticus group species, lack distinct standing setae on head underside). No comprehensive key is available for the global fauna of the umbratus group; the Nearctic species are keyed in Wilson (1955) where L. aphidicola is referred to as L. umbratus , and with the addition of L. nevadensis by Cole (1956); Wilson (1955) also includes a key to some Palaearctic species, which are also partially covered by Collingwood (1982), Boer (2003) and Seifert (1988, 1990, 1997, 2018). Focused work on this species group, particularly a global key or revision, is necessary.
Note: This group corresponds to the prior subgenus Chthonolasius , with the exclusion of L. atopus . One of our molecular terminals of this group is an undescribed species near L. subumbratus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |