Craspedothrips minor (Bagnall)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3478.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6EAC3F3D-C038-4D24-9BC3-A5836D0AEE29 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B78D43-FF9E-FF8D-FF44-E14CFDC2F8EC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Craspedothrips minor (Bagnall) |
status |
|
Craspedothrips minor (Bagnall) View in CoL
( Figs 20, 21 View FIGURES 15–21 )
Physothrips minor Bagnall, 1921: 393 View in CoL
Described from India and transferred to Craspedothrips View in CoL by Mound (1968), four synonyms were indicated by Bhatti (1990) who recorded the species as widespread across India to Bangladesh, Indonesia and Taiwan. Specimens have also been seen from Thailand and Malaysia, and from northern Australia as well as eastern Australia near Sydney. Despite the frequency with which adults have been taken, the larval host-plant range remains unknown. Females and two larvae have been studied collected from Cassia View in CoL at Delhi by J.S.Bhatti, and as noted above, adults are commonly taken on Acacia View in CoL or Cassia siamea View in CoL with flowers [ Fabaceae View in CoL ] imported from Thailand by Japanese plant quarantine ( Masumoto, 2009; Masumoto et al., 2003). The two larvae taken at Delhi are pale yellow, with long capitate setae on the thorax and abdomen, the body surface bears numerous transverse rows of small elongate tubercles, but the posterior margin of tergite VIII is without tubercles.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Craspedothrips minor (Bagnall)
Mound, L. A., Masumoto, M. & Okajima, S. 2012 |
Physothrips minor
Bagnall, R. S. 1921: 393 |