Atypena cirrifrons, (HEIMER, 1984)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab033 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BE2B3859-8F6A-4543-8A69-91840F82377B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6968000 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B787C7-FFA6-7651-FC3D-D55048DDF3D1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Atypena cirrifrons |
status |
|
ATYPENA CIRRIFRONS ( HEIMER, 1984) View in CoL
( FIGS 7G View Figure 7 , 67H View Figure 67 , 68H View Figure 68 , 74 View Figure 74 )
Paranasoona cirrifrons Heimer, 1984: 87 View in CoL , figs 1–8 (Dmf).
Paranasoona cirrifrons Zhu & Sha, 1992: 42 View in CoL , figs 1–8 (mf).
Paranasoona cirrifrons Song et al., 1999: 203 View in CoL , fig. 114N–Q (mf).
Atypena cirrifrons Tanasevitch, 2014b: 72 View in CoL View Cited Treatment (Tmf from Paranasoona = Atypena View in CoL ).
Atypena cirrifrons Komisarenko et al., 2019: 27 View in CoL , figs 1, 2 (m).
Examined material: Laos: Champasak, Muang Bachieng, Pak Song (15°10.6’ N, 106°14.253’ E), plateau, pine forest, 1280 m, at day, sweepnet, 1♂ 27.ix.2009, coll. P. Jäger, det. A. V. Tanasevitch, 2014 ( SMF 64983-124 About SMF ) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis:
Males: According to available illustrations of Atypena species, they are all similar in regard to their prosomal and palpal morphology. According to our observation, this species can be distinguished from A. formosana by the proportionally longer distal suprategular apophysis and ventral radical process.
Females: No study of Atypena comparative female morphology exists to date; such diagnosis is, therefore, beyond the scope of the current study.
Description:
Male ( SMF): Total length: 1.60. Prosoma: 0.73 long, 0.59 wide, PME region largely elevated, interocular region with translucent setae laterally curved ( Fig. 7G View Figure 7 ). Eyes: AME-AME: 0.03, AME width: 0.06, AME- ALE: 0.03, ALE width: 0.07, ALE-PLE: 0.01, PLE width: 0.08, PLE-PME: 0.14, PME width: 0.07, PME- PME: 0.14. Clypeus: upper-half hirsute, one sub- AME seta. Sternum: 0.42 long, 0.43 wide. Chelicerae: mastidia absent; stridulatory striae imbricated, rows compressed proximally ( Fig. 67H View Figure 67 ). Legs: tibia chaetotaxy 2-2-1-1, dorsal proximal macroseta on tibia I, II, III and IV 0.46, 0.64, 0.83 and 1.81 times diameter of tibia, respectively; Tm I: 0.79. All metatarsi with trichobothrium. Pedipalp: patella prolateral proximal vertical macrosetae absent; tibia with one prolateral, two retrolateral trichobothria; TPA short, pointed and sclerotized at tip; PC base not visible from dorsal view, distal setae close to distal clasp, terminal part slightly enlarged, distal clasp without striae, clasp extended apically ( Fig. 74A View Figure 74 ); T without papillae; PT small, without papillae; TS long and slender, without papillae ( Fig. 74A, C View Figure 74 ); MSA absent; DSA wide, truncated at tip, ventral corner more extended than dorsal corner ( Fig. 74A View Figure 74 ); EM broad and flat, without papillae, exceeding ARP; ARP flat, unsclerotized; LER retrolateral to E; VRP long, slender; R without papillae; TP long, slender; E short and stout, slightly retrolaterally curved ( Fig. 74B View Figure 74 ). Opisthosoma: dorsal pattern see Fig. 68H View Figure 68 ; PMS with mAP, three AC; PLS with triad, 3+ AC ( Fig. 74F View Figure 74 ).
Distribution: India, China, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam.
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Atypena cirrifrons
Lin, Shou-Wang, Lopardo, Lara & Uhl, Gabriele 2022 |
Atypena cirrifrons
Komisarenko AA & Omelko MM & Marusik YM 2019: 27 |
Paranasoona cirrifrons
Song DX & Zhu MS & Chen J 1999: 203 |
Paranasoona cirrifrons
Zhu CD & Sha YH 1992: 42 |
Paranasoona cirrifrons
Heimer S 1984: 87 |