Neoseiulus californicus ( McGregor, 1954 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.22073/pja.v12i1.77425 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B71F3D-FFB1-D451-FE40-9B79FE37DD45 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2023-07-03 13:38:09, last updated 2023-12-05 21:13:24) |
scientific name |
Neoseiulus californicus ( McGregor, 1954 ) |
status |
|
Neoseiulus californicus ( McGregor, 1954) View in CoL View at ENA
Typhlodromus californicus McGregor, 1954: 89 .
Amblyseius californicus, Schuster & Pritchard 1963: 271 .
Cydnodromus californicus, Athias-Henriot 1977: 64 .
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) californicus, Ueckermann & Loots 1988: 150 ; Ehara et al. 1994: 126. Neoseiulus californicus, Moraes et al. 1986: 73 View in CoL ; Chant & McMurtry 2003 a: 21; Moraes et al. 2004 a: 109; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 25; Guanilo et al. 2008a: 27, 2008b: 19; sensu Athias-Henriot 1977, Beaulieu & Beard, 2018: 469.
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) californicus, Ehara & Amano 1998: 33 .
Typhlodromus chilenensis Dosse, 1958: 55 (synonymy according to Athias-Henriot 1977). Typhlodromus mungeri McGregor, 1954: 92 (synonymy according to Athias-Henriot 1959). Amblyseius wearnei Schicha, 1987: 103 (synonymy according to Tixier et al. 2014).
This species is distributed worldwide (see below) and has been introduced in several countries for biological control issues. It is commercialised and released in various crops to control mite pests, especially Tetranychus urticae Koch View in CoL and Panonychus ulmi (Koch) View in CoL . It is also naturally found on uncultivated plants or crops such as apple. Many studies deal with its biology. It is a Type 2 specialized predator of tetranychid mites (McMurtry et al. 2013). Nevertheless, it has characteristics of both specialist and generalist predatory mites ( Castagnoli and Simoni 2003). It prefers to feed on spider mites ( Gomez-Moya et al. 2009), but can also consume other mite species like tarsonemid mites [ Phytonemus pallidus (Banks) ] ( Easterbrook et al. 2001), small insects such as thrips ( Rodriguez-Reina et al. 1992) and even pollen when prey is unavailable ( Rhodes and Liburd 2006). It can migrate from grasses to fruit trees or grapevines and vice versa ( Auger et al. 1999). It is a specialist predator of T. urticae View in CoL on annual plants and woody species, and of P. ulmi View in CoL and various Tetranychus spp. (and perhaps eriophyid mites) on trees and less frequently on grapevines ( Auger et al. 1999). Neoseiulus californicus View in CoL is well known as a biological control agent sold in many countries for the management of spider mites in greenhouses but also in outdoor crops such as fruit crops in Europe. This species was recently recorded and mentioned in La Réunion and Slovenia ( Kreiter et al. 2020a, b).
Specimen examined – one ♀. Mazandaran Province – one ♀, Javarem park (349 m aasl, 52° 54′ 30.47′′ E, 36° 13′ 42.44′′ N) on an unknown host plant, 6VIII.2018 GoogleMaps .
World distribution – Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Azores, Brazil, Canada, Canary Islands, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Cyprus, France, Greece, Guadeloupe Island, Guatemala, Iran, Italy, Japan, La Réunion Island, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, Portugal, Senegal, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Syria, Taiwan, Tunisia, Türkiye, Uruguay, USA, Venezuela, Vietnam. Precise distribution in Iran is documented in Kazemi et al. (2022).
Remarks – Neoseiulus californicus is already recorded in Iran but was not reported for Mazandaran Province. The description and measurements of the adult females collected agree with those provided by Tixier et al. (2008) for specimens of the world, by Ferragut et al. (2010) for specimens from Spain and by Kreiter et al. (2020b) for specimens from La Réunion and various other regions in the world.
Athias-Henriot, C. (1959) Acariens planticoles d'Algerie. I. 5 e contribution au genre Amblyseius Berlese (Phytoseiidae). II. Premiere liste d'Actinochitinosi (Cheyletidae, Caligonellidae, Hemi- sarcoptidae). Bulletin de l'Academie Royale de Belgique, Sciences (Ser. 5), 45: 130 - 153.
Athias-Henriot, C. (1977) Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. III. Sur le genre Cydnodromus: Redefinition, composition (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga, 22: 61 - 73. DOI: 10.1007 / BF 02372991
Auger, P., Tixier, M. - S., Kreiter, S. & Fauvel, G. (1999) Factors affecting ambulatory dispersal in the predaceous mite Neoseiulus californicus. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 23: 235 - 250. DOI: 10.1023 / A: 1006019014708
Beaulieu, F. & Beard, J. J. (2018) Acarine biocontrol agents Neoseiulus californicus sensu Athias-Henriot (1977) and N. barkeri Hughes (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) redescribed, their synonymies assessed, and the identity of N. californicus (McGregor) clarified based on examination of types. Zootaxa, 4500 (4): 451 - 507. DOI: 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4500.4.1
Castagnoli, M. & Simoni, S. (2003) Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari Phytoseiidae): Survey of biological and behavioural traits of a versatile predator. Redia, 86: 153 - 164.
Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2003) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part I. Neoseiulini new tribe. International Journal of Acarology, 29 (1): 3 - 46. DOI: 10.1080 / 01647950308684319
Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2007) Illustrated keys and diognoses for the genera and subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the world (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, 219 pp.
Dosse, G. (1958) Uber einige neue Raubmilbenarten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Pflanzenschutz Berichte, 21: 44 - 61
Easterbrook, M. A., Fitzgerald, J. D. &, Solomon, M. G. (2001) Biological control of strawberry tarsonemid mite Phytonemus pallidus and two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on strawberry in the UK using species of Neoseiulus (Amblyseius) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental Applied Acarology, 25: 25 - 36. DOI: 10.1023 / A: 1010685903130
Ehara, S., Okada, Y. & Kato, H. (1994) Contribution to the knowledge of the mite family Phytoseiidae in Japan (Acari: Gamasina). Journal of the Faculty of Education of Tottori University, Natural Sciences, 42 (2): 119 - 160.
Ehara, S. & Amano, H. (1998) A revision of the mite family Phytoseiidae in Japan (Acari: Gamasina), with remarks on its biology. Species Diversity, 3 (1): 25 - 73. DOI: 10.12782 / specdiv. 3.25
Ferragut, F., Perez Moreno, I., Iraola, V. & Escudero, A. (2010) Acaros depredadores em las plantas cultivadas. Familia Phytoseiidae. Ediciones Agrotecnicas, Madrid, 202 pp.
Gomez-Moya, C. A. & Ferragut, F. (2009) Spatial distribution pattern and efficacy of Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the control of red spider mites on vegetables under semi-field conditions. Bolletin Sanidad Vegetal Plagas, 35: 377 - 390.
Guanilo, A. D., Moraes, G. J. de & Knapp, M. (2008 a) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma from Peru, with description of four new species. Zootaxa, 1880: 1 - 47. DOI: 10.11646 / zootaxa. 1880.1.1
Guanilo, A. D., Moraes, G. J. de, Toledo, S. & Knapp, M. (2008 b) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Argentina, with description of a new species. Zootaxa, 1884: 1 - 35. DOI: 10.11646 / zootaxa. 1884.1.1
Kazemi, S., Mohammad-Doustaresharaf, M. & Doker, I. (2022) An annotated checklist of the Iranian Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata), with an updated key to the species. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 27 (4): 697 - 748. DOI: 10.11158 / saa. 27.4.6
Kreiter, S., Amiri, K., Douin, M., Bohinc, T., Trdan, S. & Tixier, M. - S. (2020 a) Phytoseiid mites of Slovenia (Acari: Mesostigmata): new records and first description of the male of Amblyseius microorientalis. Acarologia, 60 (2): 203 - 242. DOI: 10.24349 / acarologia / 20204364
Kreiter, S., Payet, R. - M., Douin, M., Fontaine, O., Fillatre, J. & Le Bellec, F. (2020 b) Phytoseiidae of La Reunion Island (Acari: Mesostigmata): three new species and two males described, new synonymies, and new records. Acarologia, 60 (1): 111 - 195. DOI: 10.24349 / acarologia / 20184273
McGregor, E. A. (1954) Two new mites in the genus Typhlodromus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Southern California Academy of Science Bulletin, 53: 89 - 92.
Moraes, G. J. de, McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. (1986) A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. References to taxonomy, synonymy, distribution and habitat. EMBRAPA-DDT, Brasilia, Brazil, 353 pp.
Moraes, G. J. de, McMurtry, J. A., Denmark, H. A. & Campos, C. B. (2004) A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa, 434: 1 - 494. DOI: 10.11646 / zootaxa. 434.1.1
Rhodes, L. M. & Liburd, O. E. (2006) Evaluation of predatory mites and Acramite for control of twospotted spider mites in strawberries in north central Florida. Journal of Economic Entomology, 99 (4): 1291 - 1298. DOI: 10.1093 / jee / 99.4.1291
Rodriguez-Reina, J. M., Garcia-Mari, F. & Ferragut, F. (1992) Predatory activity of phytoseiid mites on different developmental stages of the Western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis. Bolletin Sanidad Vegetal Plagas, 18: 253 - 263.
Schicha, E. (1987) Phytoseiidae of Australia and neighboring areas. Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, Michigan, USA, 187 pp.
Schuster, R. O. & Pritchard, A. E. (1963) Phytoseiid mites of California. Hilgardia, 34: 191 - 285. DOI: 10.3733 / hilg. v 34 n 07 p 191
Tixier, M. - S., Guichou, S. & Kreiter, S. (2008) Morphological variation in the biological control agent Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae): consequences for diagnostic reliability and synonymies. Invertebrate Systematics, 22: 453 - 469. DOI: 10.1071 / IS 07052
Tixier, M. - S., Lopes, I., Blanc, G., Dedieu, J. L. & Kreiter S. (2014) Phytoseiid mite diversity (Acari: Mesostigmata) and assessment of their spatial distribution in French apple orchards. Acarologia, 54 (1): 97 - 111. DOI: 10.1051 / acarologia / 20142114
Ueckermann, E. A. & Loots, G. C. (1988) The African species of the subgenera Anthoseius De Leon and Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Entomological Memoirs, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Republic of South Africa, 73: 168 pp.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neoseiulus californicus ( McGregor, 1954 )
Farazmand, Azadeh, Jalaeian, Mahdi, Kamali, Hashem, Saboori, Alireza, Tixier, MarieStéphane & Kreiter, Serge 2023 |
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) californicus
Ehara, S. & Amano, H. 1998: 33 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) californicus
Beaulieu, F. & Beard, J. J. 2018: 469 |
Guanilo, A. D. & Moraes, G. J. de & Knapp, M. 2008: 27 |
Guanilo, A. D. & Moraes, G. J. de & Toledo, S. & Knapp, M. 2008: 19 |
Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. 2007: 25 |
Ehara, S. & Okada, Y. & Kato, H. 1994: 126 |
Ueckermann, E. A. & Loots, G. C. 1988: 150 |
Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. 1986: 73 |
Cydnodromus californicus
Athias-Henriot, C. 1977: 64 |
Amblyseius californicus
Schuster, R. O. & Pritchard, A. E. 1963: 271 |
Typhlodromus chilenensis
Schicha, E. 1987: 103 |
Dosse, G. 1958: 55 |
McGregor, E. A. 1954: 92 |
Typhlodromus californicus
McGregor, E. A. 1954: 89 |