Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bakeri ( Garman, 1948 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.22073/pja.v12i1.77425 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B71F3D-FFA1-D442-FE7C-9D26FEFAD465 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bakeri ( Garman, 1948 ) |
status |
|
Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bakeri ( Garman, 1948) View in CoL
Seiulus bakeri Garman, 1948: 15 .
Typhlodromus (Neoseiulus) bakeri, Nesbitt 1951: 36-37 View in CoL .
Typhlodromus bakeri, Cunliffe & Baker 1953: 10 View in CoL .
Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) bakeri, Chant 1959: 63 View in CoL .
Typhlodromella bakeri, Muma 1961: 299 .
Amblydromella bakeri, Muma 1967: 267–280 ; Moraes et al. 1986: 155.
Mumaseius bakeri, Abbasova 1972: 10 .
Anthoseius (Aphanoseius) bakeri, Wainstein 1972: 1477–1482 View in CoL .
Anthoseius bakeri, Beglyarov 1981: 24 View in CoL .
Amblydromella (Aphanoseia) bakeri , Denmark & Welbourn 2002: 308.
Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bakeri, Moraes et al. 2004: 311 View in CoL ; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 152. Anthoseius (Aphanoseius) clavatus Wainstein, 1972: 1481 (synonymy according to Evans & Edland 1998).
Specimens examined – seven ♀♀ and one ♂. Guilan Province – seven ♀♀ and one ♂, Anzali (− 22 m aasl, 49° 28′ 13.42′′ E, 37° 27′ 59.15′′ N), on Rubus idaeus View in CoL L. ( Rosaceae View in CoL ), 25.IX. 2020 GoogleMaps .
World distribution – Alaska, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Canada, Caucasus Region, Czechoslovakia, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Georgia, Greece, Hawaii, Hungary, India, Iran, Italy, Latvia, Moldova, Montenegro, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye, Ukraine, USA. Precise distribution in Iran is documented in Kazemi et al. (2022).
Remarks – This species was already recorded from Iran in several Provinces. Morphometric characters fit well with previous measurements provided for example by Chant et al. (1974), Karg (1982), Ferragut et al. (2010), Rahmani et al. (2010) and Faraji et al. (2008). We have compared these specimens here collected with specimens from Slovenia ( Kreiter et al. 2020a) and there are only very slight variations.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bakeri ( Garman, 1948 )
Farazmand, Azadeh, Jalaeian, Mahdi, Kamali, Hashem, Saboori, Alireza, Tixier, MarieStéphane & Kreiter, Serge 2023 |
Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bakeri
Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. 2007: 152 |
Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. & Campos, C. B. 2004: 311 |
Wainstein, B. A. 1972: 1481 |
Amblydromella (Aphanoseia) bakeri
Denmark, H. A. & Welbourn, W. C. 2002: 308 |
Anthoseius bakeri
Beglyarov, G. A. 1981: 24 |
Anthoseius (Aphanoseius) bakeri
Wainstein, B. A. 1972: 1482 |
Amblydromella bakeri, Muma 1967: 267–280
Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. 1986: 155 |
Muma, M. H. 1967: 280 |
Typhlodromella bakeri
Muma, M. H. 1961: 299 |
Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) bakeri
Chant, D. A. 1959: 63 |
Typhlodromus bakeri
Cunliffe, F. & Baker, E. W. 1953: 10 |
Typhlodromus (Neoseiulus) bakeri
Nesbitt, H. H. J. 1951: 37 |
Seiulus bakeri
Garman, P. 1948: 15 |