Calapnita bugis, Bernhard A. Huber, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.273086 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0FA0F51A-3868-4F13-A93D-E34CA5A689F8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6040236 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B66F68-8515-0719-FF6A-F9FA2804FAAF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Calapnita bugis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Calapnita bugis View in CoL sp. nov. Figs 180–187 View FIGURES 172 – 187
“ Calapnita vermiformis View in CoL ” (misidentification; only specimens from Sulawesi): Deeleman-Reinhold 1986a: 45; 1986b: 212. Huber 2011: 48, figs 141, 147–152.
Diagnosis. Distinguished from most species of vermiformis group (except C. dayak ) by wide obtuse tip of ventral flap of procursus ( Figs 180–181 View FIGURES 172 – 187 ); from most (except C. saluang ) also by thin proximal part of bipartite cheliceral apophysis ( Fig. 184 View FIGURES 172 – 187 ) and by strong and regular fringes at tip of embolus; from most (except C. bohol ) also by oval pore plates in transversal orientation ( Fig. 187 View FIGURES 172 – 187 ); from several species also by narrow and distinct epigynal ‘knob’ ( Fig. 186 View FIGURES 172 – 187 ).
Etymology. Named for the Buginese people, an ethnic group in southwestern Sulawesi; noun in apposition.
Material examined. Holotype. INDONESIA-SULAWESI: ♂, RMNH ( ARA 17817), South Sulawesi, 55 km from Udjung Pandang, 23 km from Camba [~ 5.05°S, 119.74°E], under leaves in karst forest, 9 & 13–14.viii.1980 (C.L. & P.R. Deeleman). GoogleMaps
Other material. INDONESIA-SULAWESI: 3♂ 3♀, RMNH ( ARA 17420), same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 1♀, RMNH ( ARA 17426), same data but only 9.viii.1980 GoogleMaps . 2♂ 3♀, RMNH ( ARA 17423), North Sulawesi, Dumoga, near Doloduo [~ 0.517°N, 123.917°E], primary forest, from leaves, 27–30.viii.1982 (collector not given). GoogleMaps
Assigned tentatively. INDONESIA-SULAWESI: 2♂ 2♀, RMNH ( ARA 17425), Central Sulawesi, Palu, Marena, Lore Lindu Reserve [~ 1.3°N, 120, 083°E], “dark little stream valley”, from leaves, 24.vii.1982 (collector not given).
Description. Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 5.2, carapace width 0.65. Leg 1 missing, tibia 2: 5.5, tibia 3: 3.4, tibia 4: 6.0. Distance PME-PME 200 µm, diameter PME 80 µm, distance PME-ALE ~30 µm; no trace of AME.
COLOR. Entire animal very pale gray to whitish, legs with brown patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints.
BODY. Habitus as in close relatives (cf. Figs 120, 122 View FIGURES 120 – 127 ); ocular area barely elevated, each triad on very low hump; carapace without median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum barely wider than long (0.48/0.46), unmodified.
CHELICERAE. As in Figs 184–185 View FIGURES 172 – 187 , apophyses near lamellae clearly bipartite, proximal parts slender (similar to C. saluang ), with pair of barely visible lateral processes; without modified hairs; without stridulatory ridges.
PALPS. In general similar to C. vermiformis (cf. figs 139 and 140 in Huber 2011); trochanter apophysis slender, as in Fig. 182 View FIGURES 172 – 187 ; femur as in Fig. 183 View FIGURES 172 – 187 , distal process at 44% of femur length; tibia length/diameter 0.51/0.25; procursus as in Figs 180–181 View FIGURES 172 – 187 , with simple ventro-distal flat sclerite; bulb length 0.40; embolus length 0.60; embolus tip with strong and regular semi-transparent fringes.
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs.
Male (variation). Tibia 1 in three other males: 7.7, 7.7, 7.8. The specimens from Lore Lindu Reserve are assigned tentatively because the tip of the procursus differs slightly (ventro-distal flat sclerite directed slightly more towards ventral).
Female. In general similar to male; eye triads slightly closer together (distance PME-PME 180 µm). Tibia 1 in 3 females: 6.3, 6.5, 6.7. Epigynum as in Fig. 186 View FIGURES 172 – 187 , weakly sclerotized triangular plate with small and slender anterior ‘knob’; internal genitalia as in Fig. 187 View FIGURES 172 – 187 , much longer than wide, with small elongated pore plates in transversal orientation far from posterior margin.
Distribution. Apparently widespread in Sulawesi ( Fig. 283 View FIGURE 283 ).
RMNH |
National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.