Loneuroides tamaensis, García Aldrete, Alfonso N., Obando, Ranulfo González & Gironza, Nancy Carrejo, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4093.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EFB73145-11AD-4E2D-B4EC-AC07E55F962D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6078014 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B5E635-FF8F-FF8B-FF48-FB6F2B31C7E3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Loneuroides tamaensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Loneuroides tamaensis View in CoL n. sp. Female
( Figs 30–35 View FIGURES 30 – 35 )
Diagnosis. Differing from the known species in the genus, in having the forewing M eight branched, the branch nearest the areola postica forked (see also Discussion, below).
Color (in 80% ethanol). Body dark brown, with ochre brown spots. Head brown, with dark brown spots ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 30 – 35 ). Compound eyes dark brown, ocelli hyaline, with ochre centripetal crescents. Fore legs brown, hind legs cream, frontal and middle coxae with dark brown spots, hind coxae with proximal and distal brown spots; femur with apical brown ring. Forewing with a marginal, pigmented band from R4+5 to confluence of Cu2-1A, with clear areas on sides of some vein ends at wing margin; pterostigma brown with large, central clear area ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30 – 35 ). Veins pale brown, with dark brown areolae on setal insertions. Abdomen brown, with ochre subcuticular spots. Epiproct and paraprocts pale brown; subgenital plate with dark brown lateral and clear central area, with dark brown areolae on setal field.
Morphology. As in diagnosis, plus the following: Areola postica narrow, tall, almost reaching M, apex rounded ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30 – 35 ). Hindwing M four branched ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30 – 35 ). Subgenital plate ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30 – 35 ) broad, posteriorly rounded, with setae and pigmented areas as illustrated. Gonapophyses ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30 – 35 ), v1 long, slender, acuminate, v2 +3 proximally wide, with a pointed heel, v3 with a row of four large setae, as illustrated, distal process straight, acuminate, with a field of microspines. Ninth sternum ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30 – 35 ) trapeziform, the anterior border wider than the posterior one; an irregular pigmented band anteriorly as illustrated. Paraprocts ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 30 – 35 ) broadly triangular, rounded posteriorly, with setae as illustrated and sensory fields with 28 trichobothria in basal rosettes. Epiproct ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 30 – 35 ) elongate, approximately triangular, posteriorly rounded, with setae as illustrated.
Measurements. FW: 7475, F: 1725, T: 3087, t1: 1300, t2: 120, t3: 207, ctt1: 36, Mx4: 450, IO: 725, D: 520, d: 375, IO/d: 1.93, PO: 0.72.
Material studied. Holotype female. Colombia, Santander North, National Natural Park Tamá, Toledito Trail, 7°20’N: 72°29’ W, 1970 m., Malaise trap. (MAH, IAvH-E146093. Code 3900). 1 paratype female. Same locality. 6.VIII.2005, 1821m. Malaise trap. (MAH, IAvH-E161364. Code 5180).
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the National Natural Park Tamá, in the Department of Santander North, Colombia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |