Caligus ariicolus Wilson, 1928

Boxshall, Geoff, 2018, The sea lice (Copepoda: Caligidae) of Moreton Bay (Queensland, Australia), with descriptions of thirteen new species, Zootaxa 4398 (1), pp. 1-172 : 42-44

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4398.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:79E3EB78-D1C3-45CF-AB13-F8E61C936252

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5952148

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B587F2-AA44-4D03-B6F8-F8EE38D0FAEB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Caligus ariicolus Wilson, 1928
status

 

Caligus ariicolus Wilson, 1928

( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 )

Material examined. 6♀♀, 2♂♂, 5 immature specimens, from Neoarius graeffei (Kner & Steindachner, 1867) (TC17597) 26 June 2016, QM Reg. No. W53055 View Materials ; 2♂♂ (TC17624) 27 June 2016; 15♀♀, 4♂♂ from N. graeffei (TC17881) 4 July 2016, NHMUK Reg. Nos 2017.213–222. 11♀♀, 2♂♂ from Netuma proxima (Ogilby, 1898) (TC18830) 0 1 August 2017, NHMUK Reg. Nos 2017.223–232.

Site on host. Roof of mouth, oral cavity.

Differential diagnosis. Cephalothorax dorsoventrally flattened with well-developed marginal membranes. Frontal plates with large lunules. Genital complex with short neck section anteriorly, about 1.4 times longer than wide ( Fig. 18A View FIGURE 18 ), with weakly convex lateral margins, without posterolateral lobes; abdomen about 2.9 times longer than wide, and about 70% as long as genital complex. Proximal segment of antenna with large posterior process provided with marginal flange ( Fig. 18B View FIGURE 18 ). Post-antennal process strongly recurved, with multisensillate papillae. Maxillule with narrow flange distally on lateral margin of posterior process. Maxilliped with smooth myxal margin ( Fig. 18C View FIGURE 18 ). Sternal furca with divergent, flanged tines ( Fig. 18D View FIGURE 18 ), slightly incurved at tip; small rounded accessory processes present either side of furca. Distal exopodal segment of leg 1 ( Fig. 18E View FIGURE 18 ) without plumose setae on posterior margin but retaining 1 minute, naked vestigial seta on posterior margin; distal spine 1 longest; spines 2 and 3 each with accessory process; seta 4 just longer than spine 1, shorter than segment. Leg 2 outer spines on first and second exopodal segments aligned obliquely across ramus ( Fig. 18F View FIGURE 18 ); proximal outer spine on third segment short, distal spine with marginal membrane bilaterally; outer margin of endopodal segment 2 ( Fig. 18G View FIGURE 18 ) ornamented with large, long-tailed denticles. Leg 3 with 3-segmented exopod; bearing weakly curved spine on first segment, outer spine and inner seta on second, 3 spines and 4 setae on third segment; endopod 2-segmented; first segment with well developed velum and inner seta; compound distal segment with 6 plumose setae. Leg 4 uniramous, 3-segmented ( Fig. 18H View FIGURE 18 ); first and second exopodal segments with I and IV spines, respectively; outer spine on first exopodal segment blade-like, extending nearly to tip of lateral spine on second segment. Mean body length of female 2.41 mm, range 2.27 to 2.58 mm (based on 10 specimens): mean length of male 1.89 mm, range 1.69 to 2.08 mm (based on 4 specimens).

Remarks. This poorly known species was considered as a valid member of the Caligus productus -group by Boxshall & El-Rashidy (2009) even though the original description ( Wilson, 1928) was inadequate by modern standards. The morphological description is supplemented here. The presence of a setal vestige on the posterior margin of the distal exopodal segment of leg 1 was overlooked by Wilson (1928) and, therefore, the key in Boxshall & El-Rashidy (2009) which uses this character, will need revision. Apart from the overall fit of the body tagmata proportions, the only distinctive character apparent in Wilson’s description that can be used to positively identify this species is the unusual blade-like shape of the outer spine on the first exopodal segment of leg 4 ( Fig. 17H View FIGURE 17 ). The tip of this spine reaches beyond two-thirds of the length the lateral spine on the second segment and is blade-like, as figured by Wlison (1928: Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ).

This species was originally described from material of both sexes obtained from the floor of the mouth of a marine catfish, Nemapteryx caelata (Valenciennes, 1840) (as Arius caelatus ) captured in the Menam Chao Phya at Paknam, Thailand ( Wilson, 1928). It was subsequently listed as occuring on a second ariid host Netuma thalassina (Rüppell, 1837) (as Arius thalassinus ) (Hirunraks et al., 1977) in Thai waters. The discovery of this species in Moreton Bay represents a major extension of its known geographical range. The host in Australia, Neoarius graeffei , is a new host record.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF