Enicospilus dolosus ( Tosquinet, 1896 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.214150 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6181800 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B40B67-FFB9-7C18-FF09-FADD1C109797 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Enicospilus dolosus ( Tosquinet, 1896 ) |
status |
|
Enicospilus dolosus ( Tosquinet, 1896) View in CoL
( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 c)
Amesospilus hammersteini Enderlein, 1921: 21 ; Enicospilus dwibinduae Rao & Nikam, 1969: 12 View in CoL ; Enicospilus laticarinatus Chiu, 1954: 19 View in CoL ; Enicospilus melanospilus Cameron, 1906b: 48 View in CoL ; Enicospilus spilonotus Cameron, 1905d: 44 View in CoL ; Henicospilus apicifumatus Morley, 1915: 139 ; Henicospilus atricornis Morley, 1912b: 46 ; Ophion dolosus Tosquinet, 1896: 389 ; Ophion samoanus Kohl, 1908: 315
Diagnosis. In Reunion, this species may only be confused with E. mauritii , which also has a black inter-ocellar area and no central alar sclerite. The sinuous pattern of vein Rs+2r on the fore wing of E. mauritii is nevertheless characteristic.
Description. Gauld & Mitchell (1978).
Host records. Anomis leona ( Lepidoptera : Noctuidae ) and Haritalodes derogate ( Lepidoptera : Crambidae ) on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum ) and kydia (Kydia calicina).
Distribution records. Reunion (new record). Widely distributed throughout Africa to Australia, Oceania, India and South-East Asia.
Material examined. 1Ƥ Etang de St Paul, III.1996, alt. 20m, leg. C. Guillermet.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Enicospilus dolosus ( Tosquinet, 1896 )
Rousse, Pascal & Villemant, Claire 2012 |
Amesospilus hammersteini
Rao 1969: 12 |
Chiu 1954: 19 |
Enderlein 1921: 21 |
Morley 1915: 139 |
Morley 1912: 46 |
Kohl 1908: 315 |
Cameron 1906: 48 |
Cameron 1905: 44 |
Tosquinet 1896: 389 |