Potamolithus santiagensis ( Biese, 1944 ) Collado & Aguayo & Cazzaniga & Gutiérrez Gregoric & Lucía & Haase, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2019.524 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6A434946-471E-4927-8235-A793F249D560 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B1FE7C-FFC3-1C18-AFAE-F9EC15275EBD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Potamolithus santiagensis ( Biese, 1944 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Potamolithus santiagensis ( Biese, 1944) comb. nov.
Figs 1–5 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Littoridina santiagensis Biese, 1944: 187 –188, fig. 21 (Estero Dehesa, Cerro Manquehue, Barnechea, east to Santiago, Chile, type locality).
Littoridina View in CoL santiagensis– Stuardo, 1961: 17. — Valdovinos, 1999: 128, 2006: 90. — Sielfeld, 2001: 3. Heleobia santiagensis ( Biese, 1944) . Hershler &Thompson, 1992: 55. — Collado et al., 2011: 51, 54–56, fig. 2R–S.
Type material
Lectotype
CHILE • Santiago; 200611 , MNHNCL ( Collado et al. 2011).
Description
SHELL. Ovate-conic, dark brown, relatively thick, with about 5.5 whorls ( Fig. 3 View Fig A–D). Shell length about 3.0 mm ( Table 1 View Table 1 ). Periostracum brown. Protoconch smooth ( Fig. 3E View Fig ), with about 1.3 whorls and 400 μm length (± 10 μm of standard deviation, n = 9). Aperture ovate, slightly angled adapically, lip thickened. Umbilicus imperforate or absent. Operculum ovate, thin, multispiral, light brown-transparent, with eccentric nucleus ( Fig. 3 View Fig F–G); attachment scar occupying almost half of the internal surface ( Fig. 3G View Fig ). Mantle black with a conspicuous gray band on anterior margin, head black, somewhat depigmented in center ( Fig. 3 View Fig H–I). Foot black.
FEMALES. With nuchal node, white lips, tentacles grayish or black ( Fig. 3 View Fig H–I). Some specimens with a white band at base of tentacles where eyes are located. Males were not observed.
RADULA. Taenioglossate (formula 3-1-3), with two marginal teeth and a lateral tooth placed on each side of the central tooth ( Fig. 3 View Fig J–K). Central tooth trapezoidal, dorsally concave, ca. 20 μm wide; basal tongue U-shaped; with 5–6 lateral cusps on each side of median cusp and 3–4 pairs of basal cusps, first basal cusps arise from tooth face and are larger than those on cutting edge. Median cusp of central tooth
well-developed and pointed. Lateral tooth with 11 cusps and median cusp well-developed and pointed. Inner marginal teeth with about 30 cusps ( Fig. 3K View Fig ).
Ecology
Potamolithus santiagensis comb. nov. is a herbivorous-detritivorous species that inhabits small water bodies like springs and small streams.
Distribution
Yeso Spring in Cajón del Maipo, Región Metropolitana, Central Chile ( Biese 1947; Collado et al. 2011; present study). This spring is a small tributary of the Yeso River, which empties in the Maipo River. The species also inhabits small irrigation canals in the Región de O’Higgins (Lo Carreño) and Región del Maule (El Colorado). Snail collections made in 2011, 2014, 2015 and 2017 at the type locality Estero Dehesa have not provided specimens of the species. This ecosystem has been invaded by P. antipodarum ( Collado 2014) and Physa sp. (unpublished data). In Yeso Spring, P. santiagensis comb. nov. coexists with P. antipodarum and snails of the genus Chilina Gray, 1828 .
Morphometric analysis
The mean values of the shell variables obtained for the freshwater snails inhabiting central Chile are shown in Table 1 View Table 1 . Although the Kruskal-Wallis tests considering the six variables analyzed were statistically significant, only 23 of 60 pairwise post-hoc comparisons among native Potamolithus populations and P. antipodarum were significant, providing evidence of the difficulties in distinguishing these snails ( Table 2 View Table 2 ). However, in the PCA the Potamolithus populations were well separated from P. antipodarum
in the morphometric space ( Fig. 4 View Fig ). In this analysis, the first two components accounted cumulatively for 95.27% of the variance (PC1: 79.78%; PC2: 15.49%).
Molecular analysis
The COI phylogenetic analysis grouped the original sequences and those downloaded from GenBank into two main clades, Tateidae and Cochliopidae , respectively, both supported by posterior probabilities (p.p.) of 1.00 ( Fig. 5 View Fig ). Our original sequences clustered in the first clade, either in the genus Potamolithus or Potamopyrgus , both groups inferred with high node support (0.97 and 1.00 p.p., respectively). The sequences of the slender morphotype from El Yeso Spring and Lo Carreño were identified as P. antipodarum , and those of the thicker one as representatives of Potamolithus ( Fig. 5 View Fig ). The snails from El Colorado, Viña Casas del Maule, Puerto Chico, “ Heleobia ” sp. from Uspallata and “ Heleobia ” hatcheri from Aguas Negras in Argentina retrieved from GenBank were also recovered among Potamolithus species. The COI genetic distances among Tateidae species/populations from South America ranged between 0.2% and 17.0% ( Table 3 View Table 3 ). The genetic distances between P. santiagensis comb. nov. and snails from Puerto Chico were estimated at 6.7–7.2%. In the Bayesian tree, they were placed in different subclades. The population from Viña Casas del Maule grouped with “ Heleobia ” sp. from Uspallata (1.00 p.p.); they differed genetically from P. santiagensis comb. nov. by about 5.0%. On the other hand, the sequence divergence between the population from El Colorado and P. santiagensis comb. nov. from Yeso Spring and Lo Carreño was low (0.0–0.6%).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Potamolithus santiagensis ( Biese, 1944 )
Collado, Gonzalo A., Aguayo, Karina P., Cazzaniga, Néstor J., Gutiérrez Gregoric, Diego E., Lucía, Micaela De & Haase, Martin 2019 |
Littoridina
Collado G. A. & Mendez M. A. & Letelier S. & Veliz D. & Sabando M. C. 2011: 51 |
Sielfeld W. 2001: 3 |
Valdovinos C. 1999: 128 |
Hershler R. & Thompson F. G. 1992: 55 |
Stuardo J. 1961: 17 |
Littoridina santiagensis
Biese W. A. 1944: 187 |