TOMOTILUS AND
View in CoL
ANTARCHES
The two genera
Tomotilus and
Antarches
in the consensus trees obtained from both the EW and SAW analyses constituted a monophyletic clade (clade S, Fig. 16
View Figure 16
), which was the sister group of clade R ( Fig. 16
View Figure 16
). However, these two genera differ both in external features and genital characters. Additionally, no synapomorphic character supported their monophyly. As stated by Yano (1961), the monotypic genus
Tomotilus
belongs to the generic group
Oxyptilus
. It is different from all other members of this group in the absence of rough scales at the base of tibial spurs; absence of apical or subapical scale teeth on the dorsum of the third lobe of the hind wing; not parallel margins of the lobes of hind wing; well-developed uncus; broad valva; and protruded globular sterigma of the female genitalia ( Yano, 1961). Here, it has to be mentioned that the uncus in many genera of the
Oxyptilus
generic group is developed. Moreover, although based on the original description, the scale tooth on the dorsum of the third lobe of hind wing was considered as absent ( Yano, 1961, 1963a), several dark scales are concentrated in the middle part and appear as a scale tooth in this area. This is a state adopted by Gielis (1993) in his phylogenetic analysis and here was also considered. Considering the absence of a scale tooth in the middle part of dorsum of the third lobe of the hind wing in
Tomotilus saitoi
, this gave it an unresolved position in the consensus tree obtained from the EW analysis ( Fig. 18
View Figure 18
). Gielis (1993), based on the absence of vein R 1 in the fore wing and branching of Cu1 from the middle part of M3, showed a sister group relationship between the genus
Tomotilus and
the tribes
Exelastini
, Oxyptilini, Oidaematophorini, and Pterophorini together, but he later classified
Tomotilus
in
Oxyptilini ( Gielis, 2003)
.
Sphenarches anisodactyla
Sphenarches bilineatus
Sphenarches ontario
Sphenarches nanellus
Geina buscki
Geina sheppardi
Geina integumentum
Geina periscelidactyla
Geina didactyla
Geina tenuidactyla
Intercapperia scindia
Eucapperia bullifera
Capperia bonneaui
Capperia bitanniodactylus
Capperia celeusi
Capperia washbourni
Capperia fusca
Capperia evansi
Capperia fletcheri
Capperia loranus
Capperia maratonica
Capperia polonica
Capperia marginellus
Capperia ningoris
Capperia zelleri
Capperia jozana
Capperia taurica
Capperia trichodactyla
Capperia hellenica
Capperia salanga
Capperia raptor
Paracapperia esuriens
Paracapperia anatolicus
Procapperia hackeri
Capperia insomnis
Procapperia amira
Procapperia kuldschaensis
Procapperia maculatus
Procapperia orientalis
Procapperia linariae
Antarches luqueti
Antarches aguessei
Tomotilus saitoi
Oxyptilus pilosellae
Oxyptilus parvidactyla
Oxyptilus chrysodactyla
Oxyptilus delawaricus
Oxyptilus ericetorum
Crombrugghia distans
Crombrugghia tristis
Crombrugghia kollari
Crombrugghia reichli
Crombrugghia laetus
Oxyptilus anthites
Oxyptilus variegatus
Oxyptilus secutor
Dejongia californicus
Dejongia lobidactylus
Stenodacma pyrrhodes
Stenodacma wahlbergi
Trichoptilus pygmaeus
Trichoptilus cryphias
Trichoptilus maceratus
Trichoptilus varius
Trichoptilus vivax
Megalorhipida angusta
Megalorhipida fissa
Megalorhipida leptomeres
Megalorhipida leucodactylus
Megalorhipida pseudodefectalis
Stangeia siceliota
Stangeia xerodes
Megalorhipida deboeri
Megalorhipida dulcis
Megalorhipida paraiso
Megalorhipida madoris
Buckleria brasilia
Buckleria vanderwolfi
Buckleria paludum
Buckleria parvulus
Diacrotricha fasciola
Diacrotricha lanceata
Cosmoclostis brachybela
Cosmoclostis pesseuta
Merrifieldia malacodactylus
Wheeleria phlomidis
Tabulaephorus parthicus
Emmelina monodactyla
Hellinsia pectodactylus
Hellinsia bhutanensis
Adaina microdactyla
Marasmarcha ehrenbergianus
Marasmarcha asiatica
Platyptilia calodactyla
Gillmeria pallidactyla
Stenoptilia aridus
Agdistis adactyla
Agdistis huemeri
Oxyptilus aguessei
View in CoL
was transferred to
Sphenarches
View in CoL
by Bigot & Luquet (1991), but after describing
Antarches
View in CoL
and
A. luqueti, Gibeaux (1994)
View in CoL
placed
O. aguessei
View in CoL
in the newly described genus. The genus
Antarches
View in CoL
was recently assigned to
Exelastini ( Gielis, 2003)
View in CoL
. Based on the present study, there is more evidence to sustain
Antarches
View in CoL
in
Oxyptilini
View in CoL
. This genus is close to
Geina
View in CoL
,
Paracapperia
View in CoL
,
Procapperia
View in CoL
,
Intercapperia
View in CoL
,
Eucapperia
View in CoL
, and
Capperia
View in CoL
based on the presence of a cone-shaped folded area at the top of the bursa copulatrix and the emergence of the ductus seminalis from the distal part of this folded area, near to the junction with the ductus bursae (characters 167 and 169). Furthermore, it is different from the members of
Exelastini
View in CoL
in the wing shape, wing venation and patterns, as well as some genital characteristics. In both
Antarches species
, valvae are as large paddles and symmetrical. It seems probable that Bigot (1964) overlooked the exact shape of the valvae in
A. aguessei
View in CoL
and considered them as asymmetrical. The two known
Antarches species
are very similar to each other in both external and genital characters. The differences of these two species are as follows: in
A. aguessei
View in CoL
, the median part of the costal process is wider than both the distal and proximal parts, and the antrum plate is not so clear, whereas in
A. luqueti
View in CoL
, the median part of the costal process is nearly as wide as the distal part and the antrum plate is relatively pronounced. Scoring the antrum plate as absent for the latter species provided the same tree. The results of this analysis revealed that
Tomotilus and
View in CoL
Antarches
View in CoL
were much closer to the
Oxyptilus
View in CoL
generic group than to
Trichoptilus
View in CoL
.