Monochaetia ilexae N.I. de Silva, Phookamsak & K.D. Hyde, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.291.2.3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B0C841-4B0D-9B11-FF75-50CEFE6AF8A4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Monochaetia ilexae N.I. de Silva, Phookamsak & K.D. Hyde |
status |
sp. nov. |
Monochaetia ilexae N.I. de Silva, Phookamsak & K.D. Hyde , sp. nov.
Index Fungorum number: IF552505, Faces of Fungi number: FoF 02622
Etymology: the epithet “ ilexae ” refers to the host, of which the taxon was collected.
Saprobic on dead leaves of Ilex sp. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 115–180 μm diam, pycnidial, solitary, scattered, immersed to erumpent, easily broken, visible as brown, flat, scar-like structures on the host, uni-loculate, glabrous, without an ostiole, releasing conidia by breaking the host surface. Conidiomata wall multi-layered, thin walled, brown, comprising cells of textura angularis. Conidiophores indistinct. Conidiogenous cells 4–6 × 1–2 μm (x =5.4 × 1.4 μm), holoblastic, phialidic, discrete, cylindrical, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled. Conidia 20–27 × 3–5 μm diam. (x =23.7 × 6 μm), fusiform, tapering at both ends, 4-septate, erect or sometimes slightly curved; apical cell 2.5–4.7 μm long (x =3.7 μm), conical, hyaline and smooth-walled; three median cells together 13–18 μm long (x =15.8 μm), doliiform, brown, rough-walled, echinulate, upper second cell 4.9–7.1 μm long (x =5.7 μm), upper third cell 3.5–5.9 μm long (x =5.1 μm), upper fourth cell 4.3–6.9 μm long (x =5.6 μm); basal cell 2.6–5.2 μm long (x =3.7 μm), conic, hyaline and smooth-walled; apical appendage 6–24 μm long (x =15.3 μm), single, tubular, filiform; basal appendage 3–12 μm long (x =7.3 μm), single, central, tubular, filiform.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA 35 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, circular, raised, dense surface with lobate edge, zonate with different sector light brown at the margin, brown at the center and; reverse brown at the margin, dark brown at the center.
Material examined: CHINA, Yunnan Province, Shangri-La, on a dead leaf of Ilex sp. (Aquifeliaceae), July 2014, R. Phookamsak, NI009 (HKAS 92492, holotype, MFLU 16–1429 isotype), ex-type living culture KUMCC 15–0520, MFLUCC 16–0829.
Notes: The new strain, Monochaetia ilexae clusters with Monochaetia species, but is separated from the main clade with high bootstrap support (100% ML, 98% MP, 1.00 PP, Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Monochaetia ilexae shares similar morphology with the type, M. monochaeta ( Guba 1961) in having fusiform conidia and has a similar range of conidia (20–27 μm) with M. kansensis (18–26 μm) ( Guba 1961). However, M. ilexae differs from M. monochaeta as the former has fusiform, brown, 20–27 μm long conidia with a 6–24 μm long, single, apical appendage, whereas M. monochaeta has pale olivaceous, 15–21 μm long conidia, with a 5–19 μm long, single, apical appendage ( Guba 1961). Monochaetia kansensis differs in its erect, slightly curved, olivaceous or umber conidia, with a 10–38 μm long, single, apical appendage.
In Table 2 we tabulate the morphological data for different Monochaetia species ( Guba 1961). Monochaetia species have been recorded from range of host species, including Alnus sp. , Bellota sp. , Camellia sp. , Castanea sp. , Corylus sp. , Cryptomeria sp. , Osyris sp. , Pteridium sp. , Quercus sp. , Rosa sp. , Russelia sp. , Schinus sp , ( Guba 1961) and this is the first record from Ilex sp. in China ( Guba 1961, Farr & Rossman 2016).
Monochaetia bicornis , M. hysteriiformis , M. macropoda , M. miersii , M. monochaeta , M. osyrella and M. osyridella have fusiform conidia, which are similar to those of M. ilexae . Among them, M. hysteriiformis and M. osyridella have overlapping conidial lengths with M. ilexae . However, M. hysteriiformis has umber-coloured conidia, with 19–24 μm median cells and M. osyridella has chestnut brown conidia, with 15–18 μm long, basal appendage, that differs from M. illexae . Monochaetia alnea , M. cryptomeriae , M. kansensis , M. phyllostictea , M. rosae-caninae and M. schini do not have fusiform conidia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |