Fusus despectus ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3507.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:518239AC-E817-4511-AD8D-E894594A3435 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5884161 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B07151-1418-FFBF-66C7-FD02F6E1FB75 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Fusus despectus ( Linnaeus, 1758 ) |
status |
|
Fusus despectus ( Linnaeus, 1758)
1758 Murex despectus Linnaeus View in CoL : 754 View Cited Treatment , no. 487
1816 Fusus despectus Lamarck : 6, pl. 426, fig. 4
1822 Fusus despectus (Linnaeus) Lamarck : 125, sp. no. 12
1832 Fusus despectus (Linnaeus) Deshayes : 159
1840a Kiener: 29, pl. 19, fig. 2
Material in MHNG, Lamarck collection: 1 specimen MHNG INVE 51715 (ex MHNG 1098/17 ), 110 mm. This specimen was figured by Lamarck in (1816) . One specimen MHNG INVE 51716 (ex MHNG 1098/18 ), 101 mm. Locality on both labels: Mers du Nord .
Remarks: According to Rosalie de Lamarck, two specimens were originally in her father’s collection. The size of 4 pouces 2 lignes (= 11 cm) matches the size of specimen 1098/17; Kiener’s figure does not match this specimen.
Current taxonomic position: Neptunea despecta ( Linnaeus, 1758) ; placed in Neptunea [ Buccinidae ] by Sars (1878): 267. Locality is northern seas. Lamarck (1822) recognized the priority of Linnaeus’ name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Fusus despectus ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
Finet, Yves & Snyder, Martin Avery 2012 |
Fusus despectus (Linnaeus)
Deshayes, G. P. 1830: 159 |
Fusus despectus (Linnaeus)
Lamarck, [J. B. P. A.] 1822: 125 |
Fusus despectus
Lamarck, [J. B. P. A] 1816: 6 |