Diphascon greveni, Dastych, 1984

Gąsiorek, Piotr, Blagden, Brian, Morek, Witold & Michalczyk, Łukasz, 2024, What is a ‘ strong’ synapomorphy? Redescriptions of Murray’s type species and descriptions of new taxa challenge the systematics of Hypsibiidae (Eutardigrada: Parachela), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202 (1), pp. 1-63 : 5-6

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad151
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:044A402-2A0F-4135-9410-7DE081CB11C4Corresponding
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AF87C4-A63D-FFB7-AE06-68C4FB028DB5
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Diphascon greveni
status

Treatment

Diphascon greveni View in CoL ; King George Island; Dastych (1984).

Diphascon greveni ; King George Island; Tumanov and Tsvetkova (2023).

Material examined: 128 individuals in total (for details, see Supporting Information, Table S1).

Amended description: Large, body can exceed 500 μm ( Table 1), with a poorly demarcated, blunt cephalic region and a large interval between legs III and IV ( Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ). Lacking a DABT ( Figs 5B View Figure 5 , 6A View Figure 6 ). The pharyngeal annulation simple in both PCM ( Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ) and SEM ( Fig. 6A, D, E View Figure 6 ), but occasional annular bifurcations present ( Fig. 6D, E View Figure 6 ). One band of teeth in the OCA ( Fig. 6B View Figure 6 ), not detectable in PCM ( Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ). Lateral porous areas in the walls of the buccal crown reduced and partly hidden under the apophyses for the insertion of stylet muscles (AISMs) ( Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ). Furca of the Hypsibius type ( Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ). Large pharyngeal apophyses. Three bar-shaped macroplacoids occasionally merged, but microplacoid and septulum always separate ( Fig. 6G View Figure 6 ). Claws of the Hypsibius type. Claw morphology ( Figs 7 View Figure 7 , 8 View Figure 8 ) largely conforming to that described by Dastych (1984), but in rare cases the posterior claw bases were not broadened (almost all occurring asymmetrically on one leg, Fig. 7D View Figure 7 ) with respect to external claws I–III ( Fig. 7A–C View Figure 7 ). Some posterior claw bases so enlarged as to take almost a conical shape ( Fig. 7E View Figure 7 ). Claws of juveniles (probably hatchlings) delicate and with less well-developed indentation ( Fig. 7F View Figure 7 ). Rarely, this indentation may also be developed on the internal claw bases ( Fig. 8B View Figure 8 ). Internal bars visible under SEM as longitudinal thickenings adjacent to the internal claw bases

( Fig. 8A View Figure 8 ). Accessory points on claws IV more conspicuous and more widely divergent from the primary branches than on claws I–III (compare Fig. 8A, B View Figure 8 with C, D).