Cattleya, Lindley, 1824
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.186.2.2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AF87A9-FF08-EE18-DFD2-8B12FCF09560 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cattleya |
status |
|
1. Cattleya View in CoL subgenus Cattleya
1.1. Cattleya section Cattleya . Type species: C. labiata Lindley (1824 : t. 33). Cattleya ser. Monophyllae Barbosa Rodrigues (1882: 156) . Type (designated here): Cattleya labiata Lindley (1824 : t. 33). Cattleya sect. Mossiae ( Pfitzer 1889: 146) . Type (designated here): C. labiata Lindley (1824 : t. 33).
Cattleya subg. Stellatae Withner (1988: 21) . Type species: C. luteola Lindley (1853: 774) View in CoL
Cattleya sect. Xantheae Withner (1988: 21) . Type species: C. dowiana Bateman (1866: 922) View in CoL .
The species in this section ( Table 2) are the species complex around C. labiata View in CoL , and species placed by Withner (1988) in Cattleya subg. Stellatae : Cattleya iricolor Reichenbach (1874: 162) View in CoL , C. luteola View in CoL and C. mooreana Withner, Allison & Guenard View in CoL in Withner (1988: 95). These three species have much smaller flowers with narrow sepals and petals and could be recognized as a separate group, but we feel that it would be a small group and the vegetative morphology of all species in sect. Cattleya View in CoL is so consistent that this would not be necessary. This is also true for some species with small flowers that were included in Cattleya ser. Cattleyodes .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Cattleya
Berg, Cássio Van Den 2014 |
Cattleya subg. Stellatae
Withner, C. L. 1988: ) |
Lindley, J. & Paxton, J. 1853: ) |
Cattleya sect. Xantheae
Withner, C. L. 1988: ) |
Bateman, J. 1866: ) |