Amphibia, LINNAEUS, 1758

Tesakov, Alexey S., Titov, Vadim V., Simakova, Alexandra N., Frolov, Pavel D., Syromyatnikova, Elena V., Kurshakov, Sergey V., Volkova, Natalia V., Trikhunkov, Yaroslav I., Sotnikova, Marina V., Kruskop, Sergey V., Zelenkov, Nikita V., Tesakova, Ekaterina M. & Palatov, Dmitry M., 2017, Late Miocene (Early Turolian) Vertebrate Faunas And Associated Biotic Record Of The Northern Caucasus: Geology, Taxonomy, Palaeoenvironment, Biochronology, Fossil Imprint 73 (3 - 4), pp. 383-444 : 400-401

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.2478/if-2017-0021

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AF8797-FFD2-FFAF-FFFA-FF1FBE98FC07

treatment provided by

Diego

scientific name

Amphibia
status

 

Amphibia View in CoL and Reptilia

The Volchaya Balka and Gaverdovsky localities yielded 14 taxa of amphibians and 12 taxa of reptiles: Mioproteus caucasicus ESTES et DAREVSKY, 1977 (Proteidae) , Chelotriton paradoxus POMEL, 1853 , Triturus cristatus (LAURENTI, 1768) , Triturus cf. marmoratus (LATREILLE, 1800) , Lissotriton sp. (Salamandridae) , Latonia sp. (Alytidae) , Bombina cf. bombina (LINNAEUS, 1761) (Bombinatoridae) , Hyla sp. (Hylidae) , Palaeobatrachus sp. (Palaeobatrachidae) , Pelobates sp. (Pelobatidae) , Bufotes viridis (LAURENTI, 1768) , Bufo sp. (Bufonidae) , Rana sp. , Pelophylax sp. (Ranidae) , Emys cf. tarashchuki (CHKHIKVADZE, 1980) (Emydidae) , cf. Sakya sp. (Geoemydidae) , Testudinidae indet., Testudo s. s. ( Testudinidae ), Pseudopus pannonicus (KORMOS, 1911) , Anguis sp. (Anguidae) , Lacertidae indet. ( Lacertidae ), Coronella sp. , Natrix cf. longivertebrata SZYNDLAR, 1984, Natrix sp. , Colubrinae indet. ( Colubridae ), and Viperidae indet. ( Viperidae ).

Amphibia LINNAEUS, 1758

The Amphibia View in CoL are represented by the Anura View in CoL and Urodela. The tailed amphibians (Urodela) are represented by relatively large forms such as Mioproteus and Chelotriton and several smaller forms of Triturus View in CoL sensu lato. Remains of Mioproteus caucasicus are relatively rare and represented by eleven vertebrae ( Text-fig. 7a, b View Text-fig ). Their overall morphology is consistent with M. caucasicus described from the same area (Maikop city park), but from slightly older deposits, in the shape of the forking processes on the dorsoposterior region of the neural arch and other characters ( Estes and Darevsky 1977). Chelotriton is more frequent than Mioproteus and documented by about 40 cranial and postcranial (vertebrae) elements ( Text-fig. 7c, d View Text-fig ). It is assigned to Ch. paradoxus POMEL, 1853 (according to Schoch et al. 2015) based on the heavily ossified skull bones and extensive tubercular ornamentation.

Triturus View in CoL sensu lato is the most abundant tailed amphibian in Volchaya Balka and Gaverdovsky (several hundred vertebrae and skeletal elements) and represented by at least three forms. These are relatively large size Triturus cristatus View in CoL (Pl. 7, Fig. 1a, b) and Triturus cf. marmoratus View in CoL (Pl. 7, Fig. 2a, b) which differ in the length of the neural arch (long in T. cristatus View in CoL and short in T. cf. marmoratus View in CoL ) and height of the neural spine (low in T. cristatus View in CoL and high in T. cf. marmoratus View in CoL ), and smaller Lissotriton sp. (Pl. 7, Fig. 3a, b) with a very high neural spine. Additionally, two fragmentary opisthocoelous vertebrae which are different from Chelotriton in the absence of ornamentation and from Triturus View in CoL s. str. and Lissotriton View in CoL in its relatively large size and flattened posterior part of neural arch and, thus, indicate the presence of another salamandrid taxon. Bombina View in CoL is very rare in the material and represented by seven elements. It is indicated by the opisthocoelous presacral vertebrae, posterior position of tuber superior of the ilia and poorly developed pars descendens (Pl. 7, Figs 4, 5). The Caucasian Bombina View in CoL shows the presence of a prominent tuber superior and preacetabular fossa which is characteristic of B. bombina View in CoL rather than B. variegata View in CoL ( Böhme 1977, Sanchíz and Młynarski 1979). One of the most common anurans was Latonia View in CoL which is represented by 70 cranial and postcranial elements (Pl. 7, Fig. 6). It differs from Latonia gigantea (LARTET, 1851) , the most widespread species in the Late Miocene of Europe ( Rage and Roček 2003), in the maxilla lacking any sculpture. Caucasian Latonia View in CoL also differs from other existing Latonia species in shape of sacral transverse processes and possibly belongs to a separate species. Hyla View in CoL is extremely rare and represented by four ilia and a single sacral vertebra (Pl. 7, Fig. 7). Its presence is confirmed by the morphology of the ilia, i.e., thin and expanded anteriorly anteroventral margin of the pars descendens. The tuber superioris is prominent and projects anteriorly. It is nearly oval in shape, which allows distinguishing between Hyla arborea View in CoL (with an oval tuber superior) and H. meridionalis View in CoL (with a rounded tuber superior) ( Holman 1992, Bailon 2000). Because the osteological characters of Hyla savignyi View in CoL are not known, the Caucasian Hyla View in CoL can only be identified to the genus. Another common anuran is Palaeobatrachus which is represented by 50 cranial and postcranial elements (Pl. 7, Figs 8, 9). Among the other palaeobatrachids it clearly differs from the older (Oligocene – Early Miocene) Palaeobatrachus species and is most similar to the Plio-Pleistocene species ( P. eurydices and P. langhae ) in the reduction of premaxillar and maxillar teeth. The Pelobatidae View in CoL , which are predominantly fossorial (burrowing) frogs are fairly rare here (about 15 cranial bones, vertebrae and ilia; Pl. 7, Fig. 10). Most available remains were assigned to the extant genus Pelobates View in CoL . As in the other Pelobates View in CoL , it is characterized by missing dorsal crests on the iliac shafts and striated scars on the postero-mesial border of the ilia. As in the Miocene Pelobates View in CoL it has a small interiliac tubercle ( Rage and Hossini 2000). In addition to Pelobates View in CoL , the material from Volchaya Balka also includes several remains of the fossil genus Eopelobates with characterictic pit-and-ridge sculpture on frontoparietals ( Syromyatnikova 2017). Bufonidae View in CoL are documented by toothless premaxilla and lateral position of the olecranon scar on the humerus and several fragmentary ilia. The presence of small bulges on the lateral side of the tuber superior on the ilium and preacetabular fossa indicates the toad species Bufotes viridis View in CoL (Pl. 7, Fig. 11). In the material it is represented by the less than 10 bones. The single humerus which is assigned here to Bufo sp. can be distinguished from the former species by its larger size (about twice as big as B. viridis View in CoL ). Ranidae View in CoL are the most numerous in the amphibian material and are represented by more than 300 cranial and postcranial elements (Pl. 7, Figs 12, 13). Some specimens exhibit characters typical for brown frogs Rana View in CoL ( Rana temporaria View in CoL group), i.e., lateral position of the parietal eminence of the frontoparietal, dorsally inflected medial and lateral crests of humerus, presence of tubercles on tuber superior of the ilia ( Böhme 1977, Ratnikov 2001). Most of the ranid bones exhibit characters typical for green frogs Pelophylax View in CoL ( Rana esculenta View in CoL group) (Pl. 7, Fig. 14), i.e., elongate external mandibular ridge of angular, extremely expanded and flattened pars epicoracoidalis and slender middle part of coracoid, high dorsal crest (much higher than iliac shaft) of ilium, laterally flattened tuber superior and its position close to the front of the anterior edge of the acetabulum ( Böhme 1977, Böhme and Günther 1979, Rage 1984, Ratnikov 2001). Extant ranid species are mainly distinguished by external morphological characters. Thus, the described material of Rana sp. and Pelophylax sp. is not assigned here to extant species.

Reptilia MCCARTNEY, 1802

Turtles are not numerous in the studied localities and are preserved as isolated shell plates. Six species are present belonging to the three families: Emydidae , Geoemydidae and Testudinidae . The majority of turtle specimens belong to the emydids. Some are similar to Emys tarashchuki (described from the Late Miocene of Ukraine) in the position of skinscalesulcusontheepiplastron, whichisrelativelydistantfrom the free edge of the bone. Geoemydidae are represented by Sakya sp. , which was identified based on the peculiar shield configurations, i.e., having an extra number of vertebral, pleural and marginal scutes on the carapace ( Chkhikvadze 1983). Testudinidae are represented by a fragment of the anterior lobe of the plastron (epi+entoplastron) from the Gaverdovsky locality and several isolated shell plates. Some fragments of xiphiplastra indicate the presence of a hypoxiphiplastral hinge and can be referred to Testudo s. s.

Remains of squamates document the presence of at least six taxa. The anguids are represented, first of all, by Pseudopus pannonicus (Pl. 7, Fig. 15), the species common in the European Late Miocene. The remains of this lizard are abundant and include a posterior part of the braincase, i.e., a diagnostic element within the genus, vertebrae and osteoderms. Anguis are slightly more frequent than Pseudopus and recognized on the basis of the frontal morphology, presence of curved and widely-spaced teeth and non-rectangular osteoderms without keels (Pl. 7, Figs 16, 17). Lacertids are represented by a limited quantity of small fragments of lower jaws and vertebrae which does not permit an accurate identification of genus and species (Pl. 7, Fig. 18). Coronella sp. is represented by several small size vertebrae with a dorso-ventrally flattened neural arch and weakly developed haemal keel (Pl. 7, Fig. 19). The Caucasian Coronella is most similar to C. miocaenica VENCZEL, 1998 (Middle Miocene, MN 8, Romania and Late Miocene, MN 13, Hungary) in its less depressed neural arch ( Venczel 1998), however its centrum length/width ratio is 1.44, which corresponds to C. austriaca rather than C. miocaenica ( Szyndlar 1991a) . Three fragmentary vertebrae document the presence of another colubrine which differs from Coronella in a larger size and vaulted neural arch. The four fragmentary vertebrae are assigned to Natrix cf. longivertebrata, a widely distributed species in the European Neogene ( Szyndlar 1991b), based on their elongate and narrow centra with strong subcentral ridges. Another taxon of Natrix is characterized by its relatively small size and centrum length/centrum width ratio of 1.38 (Pl. 7, Fig. 20). It is most similar to N. rudabanyaensis SZYNDLAR, 2005 (Middle – Late Miocene, MN 6–9, Hungary and Romania) in its moderately developed subcentral ridges, centrum length/ width ratio and, rounded distal hypapophyseal tip ( Szyndlar 2005). The single fragmentary trunk vertebra is assigned to the Viperidae , however, due to the limited amount of the material, the identification is possible to the family rank only.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Amphibia

Loc

Amphibia

Tesakov, Alexey S., Titov, Vadim V., Simakova, Alexandra N., Frolov, Pavel D., Syromyatnikova, Elena V., Kurshakov, Sergey V., Volkova, Natalia V., Trikhunkov, Yaroslav I., Sotnikova, Marina V., Kruskop, Sergey V., Zelenkov, Nikita V., Tesakova, Ekaterina M. & Palatov, Dmitry M. 2017
2017
Loc

P. eurydices

Villa, Rocek, Tschopp, van den Hoek Ostende & Delfino 2016
2016
Loc

Mioproteus caucasicus

ESTES et DAREVSKY 1977
1977
Loc

M. caucasicus

ESTES et DAREVSKY 1977
1977
Loc

Mioproteus caucasicus

ESTES et DAREVSKY 1977
1977
Loc

Eopelobates

Parker 1929
1929
Loc

H. meridionalis

Boettger 1874
1874
Loc

Chelotriton

Pomel 1853
1853
Loc

Chelotriton

Pomel 1853
1853
Loc

Ch. paradoxus

POMEL 1853
1853
Loc

Chelotriton

Pomel 1853
1853
Loc

Chelotriton paradoxus

POMEL 1853
1853
Loc

Pelobatidae

Bonaparte 1850
1850
Loc

Latonia

Meyer 1843
1843
Loc

Latonia

Meyer 1843
1843
Loc

Pelophylax

Fitzinger 1843
1843
Loc

Lissotriton

Bell 1839
1839
Loc

Pelobates

Wagler 1830
1830
Loc

Pelobates

Wagler 1830
1830
Loc

Pelobates

Wagler 1830
1830
Loc

Pelobates

Wagler 1830
1830
Loc

Hyla savignyi

Audouin 1827
1827
Loc

Bufonidae

Gray 1825
1825
Loc

Bombina

Oken 1816
1816
Loc

Bombina

Oken 1816
1816
Loc

Triturus

Rafinesque 1815
1815
Loc

Triturus

Rafinesque 1815
1815
Loc

Triturus

Rafinesque 1815
1815
Loc

Reptilia

MCCARTNEY 1802
1802
Loc

Ranidae

Batsch 1796
1796
Loc

Hyla

Laurenti 1768
1768
Loc

Hyla

Laurenti 1768
1768
Loc

B. bombina

cf. bombina (LINNAEUS 1761
1761
Loc

Amphibia

LINNAEUS 1758
1758
Loc

Rana

Linnaeus 1758
1758
Loc

Rana temporaria

Linnaeus 1758
1758
Loc

Rana esculenta

Linnaeus 1758
1758
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF