Sinomophorus Wang, Alonso-Zarazaga, Ren & Zhang, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4438.3.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:439C6BBB-393A-470C-9332-383351BFAD2A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5984014 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE8372-C82B-4256-87FF-A063F373FA63 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sinomophorus Wang, Alonso-Zarazaga, Ren & Zhang, 2011 |
status |
|
Subgenus Sinomophorus Wang, Alonso-Zarazaga, Ren & Zhang, 2011
Type species. Omophorus rongshu Wang, Alonso-Zarazaga, Ren & Zhang, 2011: 44 .
Diagnosis (modified based on Wang et al. (2011)). Distinguished from nominal subgenus by the absence of tubercle on pronotal surface; bifid vestiture of the venter; the obtuse humeral angle; extremely small extent of sclerotization in the endophallus; absence of styli in the ovipositor and the absence of a spiculum ventrale on female sternite VIII. It can be separated from the subgenus Pangomophorus Voss, 1960 by the bifid vestiture of the venter; the obtuse humeral angle; and the presence of a metatibial uncus. Several diagnostic characters, including longer antennal club; elongate subtrapezoidal scutellum and smaller subhumeral calli, proposed in Wang et al. (2011) are considered invalid for a new subgeneric delimitation on the basis of the comparison between O. (S.) rongshu and O. (S.) wallacei (see details in discussion).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |