Stenus absconditus Hu & Tang, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4471.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1FFD4577-4E76-43E6-AE2D-CDFC8F7166FC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509262 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE554E-5000-FFB2-FF45-FF0AC573FDFF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Stenus absconditus Hu & Tang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Stenus absconditus Hu & Tang View in CoL , sp. n.
( Figs. 4 View FIGURES 3, 4 , 23–28 View FIGURES 23–28 )
Type Material. Holotype: China: Guizhou: ♂, glued on a card with labels as follows: “ China: Guizhou Prov., Xishui County, Sanchahe , 28°30'01''N, 106°24'12''E, 890m, 12.VII.2015, Jiang, Peng, Tu & Zhou leg.” “ Holotype / Stenus absconditus / Hu & Tang” [red handwritten label] ( SHNU) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 5♂♂ 3♀♀, same data as for the holotype. ( SHNU, cPut) GoogleMaps
Description. Brachypterous; body blackish, anterior margin of labrum, antennae, maxillary palpi and legs yellowish brown, each elytron with a oval orange spot, which is about 1/3 as long as and 1/3 as broad as the respective elytron.
BL: 4.3–4.8mm, FL: 2.1–2.4 mm.
HW: 0.86–1.01 mm, PL: 0.71–0.78 mm, PW: 0.64–0.74 mm, EL: 0.70–0.83mm, EW: 0.76–0.92 mm, SL: 0.48–0.56mm
Head 1.10–1.14 times as wide as elytra; interocular area with deep longitudinal furrows, median portion convex, extending to the level of inner eye margins; punctures round, partly confluent, slightly larger and sparser on median area than those near inner margins of eyes, diameter of large punctures about as wide as apical cross section of antennal segment II; interstices partially and indistinctly reticulated, much smaller than half the diameter of punctures except those along the midline of convex median portion, which may be a little larger than half the diameter of punctures. Paraglossa oval.
Pronotum 1.04–1.10 times as long as wide; disk relatively uneven, with shallow median longitudinal furrow, subbasal and subapical impressions indistinct; punctures more or less confluent, slightly larger than those on head; interstices rarely with indistinct reticulations, narrower than half the diameter of punctures except for those in the middle of the median longitudinal furrow, which may be as wide as the diameter of punctures.
Elytra 0.89–0.94 times as long as wide; disk uneven with distinct longitudinal humeral impression, distinct sutural impression and distinct posterolateral impression, suture convex; punctation and interstices similar to those of pronotum except the punctures are a little larger in average.
Legs with tarsomeres IV deeply bilobed.
Abdomen cylindrical; segments III–VI without paratergites, tergites and sternites distinctly separated by lateral sutures; posterior margin of tergite VII with apical membranous fringe; punctation of abdominal tergites elliptic to round, gradually becoming smaller posteriad, punctures in posterior portions of tergite III smaller than those of head in average; interstices of tergites shallowly microsculptured, slightly narrower than half the diameter of punctures to wider than diameter of punctures.
Male. Sternite VII with indistinct emargination in the middle of posterior margin; sternite VIII ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–28 ) with shallow emargination in the middle of posterior margin; sternite IX ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–28 ) with very long apicolateral projections, posterior margin serrate. Aedeagus ( Figs. 25, 26 View FIGURES 23–28 ) with median lobe stout, apical sclerotized area short, pointed at apex; expulsion clasps large; parameres as long as median lobe, swollen at apical sixth, each with 9–13 setae on apico-internal margins.
Female. sternite VIII ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 23–28 ) slightly prominent at middle of posterior margin; spermatheca ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 23–28 )sclerotized, spermathecal duct with two bents, apical chamber large and capsule very large.
Distribution. China (Guizhou).
Remarks. The new species is very similar to S. zhaiyanbini Tang & Li, 2012 from Guizhou, and can be distinguished from the latter by head and pronotum hardly with microsculptures, elytra slightly shorter and elytra spots smaller.
Etymology. The specific name “ absconditus ” means hidden.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |