Lobrathium bidigitatum, Assing, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.21248/contrib.entomol.60.2.301-361 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ACD03F-FFD5-0C2C-FEEB-FC47E37EF9DB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lobrathium bidigitatum |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lobrathium bidigitatum View in CoL sp. n. ( Figs 211-218 View Figs 211-218 )
Type material:
Holotype ♂: " Taiwan, Kaohsiung Hsien, Peinantashan trail, 2450 m, 2.V.1995, A. Smetana [ T170 ] / Holotypus ♂ Lobrathium bidigitatum sp. n., det. V. Assing 2010" (cAss). Paratype: 1 ♀: " Taiwan, Kaohsiung Hsien, Peinantashan trail, 2500 m, 4.VII.1993, A. Smetana [ T136 ]" (cSme) .
Description:
Habitus and forebody as in Figs 211-212 View Figs 211-218 . External morphology as in L. digitatum , distinguished only by the sexual characters:
♂: posterior margin of tergite VIII almost truncate in the middle; sternite VII as in L. digitatum ; sternite VIII with broad median impression, this impression with two clusters of numerous pegsetae, which are less extensive than in L. digitatum , posterior excision moderately deep and broadly U-shaped ( Fig. 213 View Figs 211-218 ); aedeagus of similar morphology as in L. digitatum , but apical lobes slightly longer, more slender, and more broadly separated, and subapical portion of ventral process not projecting laterad ( Figs 214-215 View Figs 211-218 ).
♀: posterior margin of tergite VIII weakly angled in the middle ( Fig. 216 View Figs 211-218 ); sternite VIII broader than long, approximately as long as tergite VIII, posteriorly weakly produced, posterior margin indistinctly concave in the middle ( Fig. 217 View Figs 211-218 ); segments IX-X of similar shape as in L. digitatum ( Fig. 218 View Figs 211-218 ).
Comparative notes:
As can be inferred from the similar external and sexual characters, particularly the derived morphology of the aedeagus, L. bidigitatum is very closely related to L. digitatum , from which it is best distinguished based on the shape of the apical lobes of the aedeagus.
Etymology:
The specific epithet is an adjective derived from the Latin prefix bi- (two) and the noun digitus (finger) and refers to the shape of the apical lobes of the aedeagus.
Distribution and natural history:
The type specimens were collected in the Peinantashan, Kaohsiung Hsien, southern Taiwan, at altitudes of 2450-2500 m. They were sifted from wet leaf litter, moss, and other debris in a mature mixed forest and beneath bushes along an abandoned forest road.
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.