Stenus aenescens LYNCH ARRIBALZAGA
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5311846 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5319430 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ACAD55-3D32-FFD5-FF37-948DDA02FA8A |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Stenus aenescens LYNCH ARRIBALZAGA |
status |
|
Key to the species of the group of Stenus aenescens LYNCH ARRIBALZAGA View in CoL
(DN = depth of apical emargination of sternite 8; LS = length of sternite)
1 Forebody densely reticulate.: Unknown. 4.0-4.2mm (FB 2.0-2.1mm). Argentina........... .......................................................................................................... S. aeneomicans PUTHZ View in CoL
- Forebody without reticulation.............................................................................................2
2 Frons concave with or without a slightly elevated median portion, median portion (mostly) below the level of medial eye margins.................................................................3
- Frons not concave, elevated median portion extending about to or over the level of medial eye margins...........................................................................................................16
3 Head broader than elytra or nearly as broad as (HW: EW 0.95).......................................4
- Head less broad (HW: EW 0,95).....................................................................................11
4 Median portion on frons complete flat................................................................................5
- Median portion of frons slightly elevated...........................................................................7
5 Interstices of tergite 7 reticulate. 4.5-5.6mm (FB 2.4-2.6mm).: E (fig. 163). Brazil........ ................................................................................................................. S. teres ERICHSON View in CoL
- Interstices of tergite 7 smooth.............................................................................................6
6 Head distinctly broader than elytra (HW: EW 1.05). Larger: 4.5-5.0mm (FB 2.3- 2.4mm).: E (fig. 165). Bolivia.......................................................... S. rufipes L. BENICK View in CoL
- Head slightly less broad (HW: EW 0.95). Smaller: 4.0-5.0mm (FB 2.2mm).: E (fig. 164). Brazil........................................................................................... S. riguus L. BENICK View in CoL
7 Head distinctly broader than elytra, abdomen distinctly reticulate.....................................8
- Head distinctly less broad than elytra (HW: EW 0.94), abdomen without reticulation. 4.3-4.7mm (FB 2.1-1.3mm).: E fig. 167). Brazil............................. S. sodalis L. BENICK View in CoL
8 Tergite 10 spadous, posteriorly pointed (figs 148, 150)......................................................9
- Tergite ± 10 rounded at posterior margin. 4.2-5.3mm (FB 2.2-2.4mm). Brazil.................... .................................................................................................... S. curtipennis BERNHAUER View in CoL
9 Sternum 9 with a short apicolateral tooth (fig. 156)..........................................................10
- Sternum 9 with a longer, acute apicolateral tooth (fig. 149). Brazil. see #8.......................... .................................................................................................... S. curtipennis BERNHAUER View in CoL
10: E (fig. 166), median lobe acute apically. 3.9-4.7mm (FB 2.1-2.2mm). Brazil................ ........................................................................................................... S. mantiqueira PUTHZ View in CoL
-: E (fig. 162). median lobe split apically. 4.0-4.8mm (FB 2.1mm). Brazil........................ ........................................................................................................ S. artipennis L. BENICK View in CoL
11 Tergite 8 reticulate............................................................................................................12
- Tergite 8 not reticulate. 4.0-4.7mm (FB 2.1-2.2mm).: Segment 1 of metatarsi much broader than segment 2, metatibiae compressed medially. Apical notch of sternite 8 deeper (LS: DN=1.9), E (about as in fig. 111, but median lobe longer than parameres). Brazil......................................................................................................... S. cerritus SHARP View in CoL
12 Head broader, HW: EW 0.96. Abdomen shallowly reticulate. 3.6mm (FB 1.8mm).: E (figs. 106, 114). Bolivia.................................................................... S. holmgreni View in CoL nov.sp.
- Head less broad, HW: EW 0.90. Anterior tergites not reticulate....................................13
13 Tergite 10 slightly concave at apical margin (fig. x).: Metafemur (fig. 131). E (fig. 95). 3.8-4.8mm (FB 2.2-2.3mm). Bolivia........................................... S. femoridens View in CoL nov.sp.
- Tergite 10 otherwise..........................................................................................................14
14 Tergite 10 evenly rounded at posterior margin (fig. 125).: Metafemur simple. E (fig. 168). 3.6-4.3mm (FB 1.9-2.0mm). Bolivia..................................... S. corticivagans View in CoL nov.sp.
- Tergite 10 very shallowly emarginate at posterior margin................................................15
15 Tergite 7 with faint, tergite 8 with distinct reticulation.: E (fig. 112). 3.2-4.1mm (FB 1.9-2.0mm). Peru.............................................................................................. S. inti PUTHZ View in CoL - Tergites 7 and 8 without reticulation. 3.2-3.8mm (FB 1.8-1.9mm).: Segment 1 of metatarsi simple as are the metatibiae. Apical notch of sternite 8 less deep (SL: DN= 2.4). E (fig. x). Peru............................................................................... S. cerritulus PUTHZ View in CoL
16 Tergite 10 with an acute median tip (figs 136, 140, 142)..................................................17
- Tergite 10 otherwise..........................................................................................................20
17 Apicomedian tip of tergite 10 minute (fig. 136, 142)........................................................18
- Apical tip of tergite 10 longer (fig. 140)...........................................................................19
18 Tergite 7 densely reticulate, anterior tergites shallowly reticulate.: Unknown. Argentina..................................................................................... S. argentinus BERNHAUER View in CoL
- Tergite 7 not reticulate (at most with traces of reticulation posteriorly).: E (fig. 115). 4.0-4.6mm (FB 2.1-2.2mm). Argentina................................................... S. spicatus View in CoL nov.sp.
19 Larger, head slightly broader than elytra (HW: WÉ =1.01).: Unknown. 4.5-4.8mm (FB 2.2-2.3mm). Paraguay....................................................... S. paraguyanus BERNHAUER
- Smaller, 3.7-4.3mm. Head slightly narrower than elytra (HW: EW <0.97)......................19
20 Tergite 10 (fig. 113). Shoulders rectangular.: E (fig. 136). 3.9-4.3mm (FB 1.7- 1.8mm). Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina............................................ S. plaumannianus PUTHZ View in CoL
- Tergite 10 (fig. 142). Shoulders slightly oblique.: E (fig. 169). 3.7-4.3mm (FB 2.0- 2.1mm)............................................................................................ S. spinuliventris View in CoL nov.sp.
21 Tergite 10 distinctly concave at posterior margin (figs 118, 119, 133, 134).....................22
- Tergite 10 not or shallowly concave at posterior margin (figs 143, 144)..........................25
22 Head distinctly narrower than elytra (HW: EW 1.15). Tergite 10 (figs 118, 119).: E (fig. 157): 3.7-4.2mm (FB 2.2.1mm). Argentina, Paraguay, Bolivia, Uruguay.................... ...................................................................................... S. aenescens LYNCH ARRIBALZÁGA View in CoL
- Head less narrower than elytra (HW: EW <1.13).............................................................23
23 Abdomen completely, distinctly reticulate.: Sternite 9 (fig. 145), E (fig. 159). 4.0- 4.7mm) FB 2.3-2.4mm). Peru, Bolivia........................................ S. titicacanus BERNHAUER View in CoL
- Anterior tergites not (or very shallowly) indistinctly reticulate........................................24
24: Apical notch of sternite 8 deeper (LS: DN 5). E (fig. 160). 3.8-4.8mm (FB 1.9- 2.2mm). Chile....................................................................................... S. hogansoni PUTHZ View in CoL
-: Apical notch of sternite 8 less deep (LS: DN =3.9). E (fig. 158). 3.2-3.6mm (FB 2.0mm). Bolivia........................................................................... S. corticihabitans View in CoL nov.sp.
25 Smaller, tergite 8 without reticulation; tergite 10 rounded at posterior margin (fig. 129).: Unknown. 3.0-3.8mm (FB 1.7-1.9mm). Argentina........... S. densepilosus View in CoL nov.sp.
- Larger, tergite 8 with distinct reticulation, tergite 10 rounded or slightly emarginate at posterior margin (figs 120, 128, 138)................................................................................26
26 Tergite 10 rounded at posterior margin (fig. 120). E (fig. 168). 4.3-5.0mm (FB 2.2- 2.3mm). Argentina................................................................................ S. daguerrei View in CoL nov.sp.
- Tergite 10 emarginate at posterior margin........................................................................27
27 Punctation and reticulation of tergite 8 deeper and denser (fig. 104), tergite 10 (fig. 128).: E (fig. 116). 3.8-4.2mm (FB 2.0-2.1mm). Argentina, Brazil.................................. ....................................................................................................... S. crassipes BERNHAUER View in CoL
- Punctation and reticulation of tergite 8 less coarse and less deep (fig. 105),: E (fig. 138). 4.0-5.2mm (FB 2.2-2.4mm). Brazil.................................................. S. scissus PUTHZ View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.