Ptilotis penicillata whitei Mathews
publication ID |
0003-0090 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5475897 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AC87E2-FFE4-FF92-FF3F-FDD53A8DFCBA |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Ptilotis penicillata whitei Mathews |
status |
|
Ptilotis penicillata whitei Mathews
Ptilotis penicillata whitei Mathews, 1912a: 412 (South Australia (Murray Flats)).
Now Lichenostomus penicillatus penicillatus (Gould, 1837) View in CoL . See Salomonsen, 1967: 381, Schodde and Mason, 1999: 255–256, Christidis and Boles, 2008: 185–191, and Higgins et al., 2008: 608–609.
HOLOTYPE: AMNH 695602 View Materials , adult male, collected on Murray Flats , 14 miles west of Blanchetown, 34.21S, 139.38E (Times Atlas), South Australia, Australia, on 30 May 1911, by J.B. Cleland. From the Mathews Collection (no. 8945) via the Rothschild Collection. GoogleMaps
COMMENTS: In the original description, Mathews cited his catalog number of the holotype and gave the range as ‘‘ South Australia.’’ In addition to Cleland’s original label, the holotype also bears Mathews and Rothschild type labels. This is probably the specimen reported by Cleland (1912: 17). The following specimens from South Australia were cataloged by Mathews prior to publication of the name on 31 January 1912 and are paratypes: AMNH 695594 View Materials (Mathews no. 9943), male, A. Gum Creek, Flinders Range, northeast of Port Augusta , 10 October 1911, by S.A. White (no. 336) ; AMNH 695595 View Materials (9942), male, Flinders Range, northeast of Port Augusta , 10 October 1911, by S.A. White (no. 248) ; AMNH 695596 View Materials (3295), unsexed, Adelaide , July 1902 ; AMNH 695597 View Materials (9704), male immature, Mount Lofty Range, east of Adelaide , 12 August 1911, by S.A. White (no. 96) ; AMNH 695598 View Materials (9705), male immature, Mount Lofty Range, east of Adelaide , 12 August 1911, by S.A. White (no. 51) ; AMNH 695599 View Materials (9703), female, Mount Lofty Range, east of Adelaide , 12 August 1911, by S.A. White (no. 142) ; AMNH 695604 View Materials (9478), male, Fulham , South Australia, January 1911, by Mellor ; AMNH 695608 View Materials (9479), female, Fulham, January 1911, by Mellor. AMNH 695594 View Materials and 695595 are also, respectively, the paratype and holotype of P. p. rosinae (see below). AMNH 695605 View Materials , 695606 View Materials , and 695607 were collected at Fulham by Mellor in July 1910, but were not cataloged by Mathews until 24 February 1912, and were then incorrectly attributed to Whitlock in Mathews’ catalog ; I do not consider them paratypes. AMNH 695609 View Materials was collected at Golden Grove , South Australia, on 9 June 1900 by Ashby, but I did not find it in Mathews’ catalog. Other specimens in AMNH were collected after the publication of whitei . There are also paratypes of this form in SAMA (B. Blaylock, personal commun.) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ptilotis penicillata whitei Mathews
Mary 2011 |
Lichenostomus penicillatus penicillatus (Gould, 1837)
Christidis, L. & W. E. Boles 2008: 185 |
Higgins, P. J. & L. Christidis & H. A. Ford 2008: 608 |
Schodde, R. & I. J. Mason 1999: 255 |
Salomonsen, F. 1967: 381 |
Ptilotis penicillata whitei
Mathews, G. M. 1912: 412 |