Ptilotis chrysotis ethelae Mathews
publication ID |
0003-0090 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5475873 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AC87E2-FFE3-FF95-FD22-FEAD3D37F97A |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Ptilotis chrysotis ethelae Mathews |
status |
|
Ptilotis chrysotis ethelae Mathews
Ptilotis chrysotis ethelae Mathews, 1912a: 410 (South Australia (Port Augusta)).
Now Lichenostomus plumulus graingeri (Mathews, 1912) View in CoL . See Schodde and Mason, 1999: 249–250, Christidis and Boles, 2008: 185–191, and Higgins et al., 2008: 606–607.
HOLOTYPE: AMNH 695427 About AMNH , adult male, collected on the western slopes of the Flinders Range , northeast of Port Augusta (as on original label), South Australia, Australia, on 10 October 1911, by S.A. White (no. 318). From the Mathews Collection (no. 9938) via the Rothschild Collection.
COMMENTS: Mathews cited his catalog number of the holotype in the original description and gave the range of ethelae as ‘‘ South Australia.’’ The holotype bears, in addition to White’s original label, Mathews and Rothschild type labels. As pointed out by Schodde and Mason (1999: 250), the western slopes of the Flinders Range are in an area of intergradation between L. p. plumulus and specimens from eastern South Australia, and they have used the name L. p. graingeri for the population extending across New South Wales and into Queensland (see below). Specimens in AMNH from the western Flinders Range confirm the intergradient character of the population, although the holotype is very similar to the holotype of graingeri. There are three paratypes in AMNH collected by White on the western slopes of the Flinders Range on 10 and 11 October 1911: male, AMNH 695428 About AMNH (Mathews no. 9941, White no. 313) ; females, AMNH 695429 About AMNH (9940, 328) ; AMNH 695431 About AMNH (9939, 247). Possible paratypes of ethelae are AMNH 695434 About AMNH , male, and AMNH 695435 About AMNH , female, collected at Port Pirie , South Australia, on 24 July 1908, by Mellor, but I did not find them in Mathews’ catalog and do not know when they came into his possession. Other Mathews specimens of this species from South Australia were collected after the description of ethelae was published. There are also paratypes of ethelae in SAMA (B. Blaylock, personal commun.) .
White (1912) published an account of his trip into the western Flinders Range.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ptilotis chrysotis ethelae Mathews
Mary 2011 |
Lichenostomus plumulus graingeri (Mathews, 1912)
Christidis, L. & W. E. Boles 2008: 185 |
Higgins, P. J. & L. Christidis & H. A. Ford 2008: 606 |
Schodde, R. & I. J. Mason 1999: 249 |
Ptilotis chrysotis ethelae
Mathews, G. M. 1912: 410 |