Chirodisca eximia ( Stål, 1859 )

Gnezdilov, Vladimir M., 2024, Review of the genus Chirodisca Emeljanov, 1996 (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Caliscelidae), Zootaxa 5497 (4), pp. 520-536 : 528-532

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5497.4.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5BBDDE84-3DF7-4197-95E6-02E8E7DC8493

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13619009

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AB7A3E-1F33-5C62-FF49-9BA83FCBF8AB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chirodisca eximia ( Stål, 1859 )
status

 

Chirodisca eximia ( Stål, 1859) View in CoL

( Figs 9–11 View FIGURE 6–11 , 24–50 View FIGURE 24–28 View FIGURE 29–31 View FIGURE 32–37 View FIGURE 38–41 View FIGURE 42–50 )

Caliscelis eximia Stål, 1859: 323 View in CoL (sp. n.).

Caliscelis eximia View in CoL : Singh-Pruthi, 1925: 217, pl. 27, fig. 229 (description).

Caliscelis eximia View in CoL : Menon & Parshad 1960: 141, Pl. I, figs 1–7, Pl. II, figs 1–6 (description).

Caliscelis eximia View in CoL : Linnavuori 1973:120 (record).

Caliscelis dreyfus Fernando, 1957: 15 View in CoL , syn. fide Gnezdilov & Bourgoin 2009: 12.

Caliscelis macbridei Fernando, 1960: 126 , Pl. 3, figs 12, 13, syn. n.

Chirodisca eximia View in CoL : Gnezdilov & Bourgoin 2009: 12 View Cited Treatment (comb. n.).

Type material examined ( MNB). [ Sri Lanka]: ♂, lectotype, “4956” (printed), “Type” (red, printed), “Ceylon. Nietn.” (handwritten in ink), “ Caliscelis eximia . Stål.” (handwritten in ink), “Mus. Berol.” (printed) ; 1♂, paralectotype, “Type” (red, printed), “Cat. No. 4956” (handwritten in ink), “Ceylon Nietner” (handwritten in ink), “ Caliscelis eximia Stål ” (handwritten in ink), “Mus. Berol.” (printed); 1♀, paralectotype, “Type” (red, printed), “Cat. No. 4956” (handwritten in ink), “Ceylon Nietner” (handwritten in ink), “ Caliscelis eximia Stål ” (handwritten in ink), “Mus. Berol.” (printed).

Other material examined: Sri-Lanka: 2♂, 2♀, 25 km NNO Jnginia-galla , 20–30.III.1973, G. & M. Köhler leg. ( SMNS); 1♀, Puttalam, Horn leg. ( ZSM); 1♀, Matala, Horn leg. ( SDEI). India: 1♂, Uttar Pradesh, Shiwalik Kette , S. Seite, 600 m., 13 km SW Dehra Dun, 20.VIII.1985, J. Schulze leg. ( MNB); 1♂, Bangalore, Lalbagh , 5.VI.1976, B. Mallik leg. ( SNSD). Pakistan: 1♀, Punjab, Taxila, Badal Pur Stupa , 530 m, 33.7874º N 72.8639º E, 28.V.2007, K. Schönitzer leg. ( ZSM). GoogleMaps Ethiopia: 1♂, Sodere , 18.XI.1980, “Demeter No. 508” ( HNHM); 1♂, Oromia, Abijata Shala Nat. Park, St 5, 7º28´55.5´´ N 38º39´47.8´´ E, 16.IX.2012, yellow pan trap, A. Pauly & J.L. Boeve leg. ( RBINS). GoogleMaps Chad: 2♀, Tibesti, Enneri Tao , 1–3.IV.1953, K. Guichard leg. ( MNHN) .

Emended description. Male. Structure. Metope long and narrow, almost twice as long as wide between the eyes; lateral margins slightly concave anterior to eyes; upper margin trapezoidally concave ( Figs 25 View FIGURE 24–28 , 34 View FIGURE 32–37 ). Metopoclypeal suture strongly convex ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 32–37 ). Rostrum with short 3 rd segment, 0.3 times as long as second one, cylindrical, not tapering apically ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29–31 ). Coryphe and metope joined at right angle in lateral view ( Figs 24, 28 View FIGURE 24–28 ). Coryphe transverse, twice as wide between the eyes as long medially, with weak median carina running from its posterior margin to middle; anterior and lateral margins keel-shaped ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 29–31 ). Pedicel with short process and sensory organs ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29–31 , 32 View FIGURE 32–37 ). Pronotum with median carina ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 32–37 ). Paranotal lobes of pronotum elongate and rounded ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 32–37 ). Mesonotum longer than pronotum. Fore wings reaching middle of abdominal tergite IV ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24–28 ). Venation obscure: R 2, furcating at middle; M 2, furcating apically ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 32–37 ). Fore femora and tibiae strongly flattened, foliate ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 32–37 ). Middle femora and tibiae slightly flattened. Abdominal sternite III with turned up medially hind margin (shaded on the figure); abdominal sternites IV–VII with strongly acutely angularly concave hind margins ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 29–31 ).

Male. Coloration. General coloration of head and body brownish pale yellow ( Figs 24, 25, 28 View FIGURE 24–28 ). Paranotal lobes of pronotum black in their lower portions. Fore wings black, from their costal margins to anterior branch of radius. Episternae and epimerae and fore and middle coxae black. Fore trochanters, femora and tibiae dark brown to black. Middle femora yellowish brown, with two wide dark brown bands. Middle tibiae and hind femora and tibiae yellowish brown, with dense dark brown spots. Tarsi yellowish brown, with apices of third tarsomeres and claws dark brown. Tips of leg spines black. Abdomen with wide lateral black stripes enlarged from laterotergite III to the middle of sternite VII. Sternite III light yellow. Sternites IV–VII light yellow between black lateral stripes. Pygofer dark brown to black in its lower part and brown-yellow above.

Male genitalia structure. As given for genus ( Figs 42–50 View FIGURE 42–50 ). Anal tube almost as long as wide, slightly narrowing apically ( Figs 42, 48 View FIGURE 42–50 ).

Female. Structure. Pedicel with short process and sensory organs ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 38–41 ). Fore wing venation obscure: R 2, M 2. Middle femora and tibiae slightly flattened. Abdominal sternite III with posterior margin deeply concave; abdominal sternites IV–VI with posterior margins strongly acute, angularly concave. Sternite VII with posterior margin convex, bearing median concavity. Gonoplacs flat. Anal tube nearly round, with short anal column ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 38–41 ).

Female. Coloration. General coloration of head and body brownish pale yellow with dark brown spots ( Figs 26, 27 View FIGURE 24–28 ). Fore wings with sparse spots. Each fore femur with large dark brown spot near to its apex outside ( Fig. 38 View FIGURE 38–41 ). Apices of third tarsomeres of fore and middle tarsi, third metatarsomeres, and claws dark brown. Tips of leg spines black.

Total length. Males— 2.5–3.5 mm. Females—3.2–4.0 mm.

Ecology. In Delhi ( India) the species is more abundant since April to August ( Menon & Parshad 1960).

Note. The species was described from the specimens, at least male and female, deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin ( Germany) ( Stål 1859). Recently, a male from this type series was designated as the lectotype ( Gnezdilov 2016). Caliscelis macbridei described by Fernando (1960) from two females (according to the drawings provided) from Ruhunu National Park in Sri-Lanka is placed in synonymy under Chirodisca eximia on the basis of examination of original description and the drawings ( Fernando 1960, Pl. 3, figs 12, 13) where the female is shown in dorsal and frontal views, with characteristic transverse coryphe, foliate fore femora and tibiae and slightly foliate middle femora and tibiae.

SMNS

Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkund Stuttgart

ZSM

Bavarian State Collection of Zoology

HNHM

Hungarian Natural History Museum (Termeszettudomanyi Muzeum)

RBINS

Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Caliscelidae

Genus

Chirodisca

Loc

Chirodisca eximia ( Stål, 1859 )

Gnezdilov, Vladimir M. 2024
2024
Loc

Caliscelis eximia

Linnavuori, R. 1973: 120
1973
Loc

Caliscelis eximia

Menon, R. & Parshad, B. 1960: 141
1960
Loc

Caliscelis macbridei

Fernando, W. 1960: 126
1960
Loc

Caliscelis dreyfus

Gnezdilov, V. M. & Bourgoin, T. 2009: 12
Fernando, W. 1957: 15
1957
Loc

Caliscelis eximia

Singh-Pruthi, H. 1925: 217
1925
Loc

Caliscelis eximia Stål, 1859: 323

Stal, C. 1859: 323
1859
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF