Exaerete Hoffmannsegg
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.171435 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6261023 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AAAE6F-FFCE-FF86-FE84-786BFAECF8C9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Exaerete Hoffmannsegg |
status |
|
Key to the males of Exaerete Hoffmannsegg View in CoL (Modified from Moure (1964) and Kimsey (1979))
1 Hypoepimeron with tubercle; labial palpi twosegmented ........................................ 2
Hypoepimeron without tubercle; labial palpi foursegmented ................................. 4
2(1) Frons without median tubercle ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); mesoscutellum with posterior margin convex ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a) with a median longitudinal carina between two small sublateral tubercles ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); clypeus slightly rounded ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); hind femur not basally depressed, lower inner margin unarmed ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); hind tibial slit reaching apex of tibia ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); S7 medially elevated and truncate, covered with setae ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 a); S8 evenly rounded apically ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 b); gonostylus subtriangular, ventral half clothed with dense setae, dorsal half with scattered setae; gonocoxal lobe obtusely angulate ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 c); volsella ovoid, reduced ( Mexico to northern Argentina).................................... ............................................................................. E. smaragdina (GuérinMéneville) View in CoL
Frons with median tubercle ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); mesoscutellum with posterior margin convex ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a) or straight; clypeus irregularly rounded ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b), with or without prominence in profile ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); hind femur basally depressed, armed with emarginate crest, a large tooth ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b) or elongate denticles ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); hind tibial slit very small ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a) or reaching apex ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); S7 trilobed ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 a), bilobed ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 a) or without lobes ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 a); S8 lobed medially, with apicomedial point ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 b) or apically truncate ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 b); gonostylus not as above, either differently
shaped ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 c) or entirely clothed with dense setae ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 c); gonocoxal lobe not obtusely elongate ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 c); volsella ovoid, reduced ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 c) or welldeveloped ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 c) ................................................................................................................... 3 3(2) Mesoscutellum with two sublateral tubercles ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a), posterior margin convex ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); clypeus irregularly rounded in profile ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); hind femur basally depressed, with large medial tooth on inner surface ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); S7 strongly trilobed with setae apically, median lobe strong ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 a); S8 apex slightly lobed medially ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 b); gonocoxal lobe sharply pointed ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 c) ( Mexico to Brazil) ................. .................................................................................... E. frontalis (GuérinMéneville)
Mesoscutellum straight with a median longitudinal tubercle between two small sublateral tubercles; clypeus prominent in profile; hind femur slightly depressed basally; S7 trilobed, median lobe weak relative to lateral ones; S8 lobed medially; gonocoxal lobe obtusely angulate ( Brazil)............ E. lepeletieri Oliveira & Nemésio View in CoL
4(1) Frons with median tubercle ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); mesoscutellum with posterior margin concave ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a) or linear .................................................................................................... 5
Frons without median tubercle ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); mesoscutellum with posterior margin convex ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b) or linear ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a) ............................................................................. 6
5(4) Frons with strong median tubercle ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); mesoscutellum with concave posterior margin ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a) and without punctures anteriorly; mesoscutellum with sublateral tubercles shining, conspicuous ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); hind femur with lower external border armed with a strong aculeate process followed by one or two small tubercles ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); S7 without lobes, apical margin with medial and sub lateral patches of setae and posterior row of setae ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 a); S8 with obtuse apicomedial angle ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 b); gonostylus parallel, clubbed apically; gonocoxal lobe evenly rounded ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 c) ( Costa Rica to northern Argentina).......................................... E. dentata (Linnaeus)
Frons with weak median tubercle; mesoscutellum with posterior margin linear; mesoscutellum with sub lateral tubercles densely punctured; hind femur lower external margin armed with a longitudinally emarginate crest; S7 without lobes, medially emarginated; S8 with strong apicomedial lobe; gonostylus laterally elongate and apically clubbed; gonocoxal lobe acutely angulate ( Mexico) ................ E. azteca Moure
6(4) Mesoscutellum with posterior margin convex ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); clypeus lacking vertical ridges ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); hind femur with multiple elongate denticles ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); S7 strongly bilobed, deeply incised medially, lobes truncate with long setae apically and transverse row of setae centrally ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 a); S8 apically truncate or slightly rounded ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 b); gonostylus with dense setae along ventral margin; gonocoxal lobe irregularly rounded ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 23. 18 – 22 c); volsella ovoid, reduced ( Panama to Brazil) ................................ ............................................................................................... E. trochanterica (Friese) View in CoL
Mesoscutellum with posterior margin linear ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 a); clypeus with carina forming a prominence in profile ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); hind femur with large tooth in basal half of inner margin ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 1 – 17. 1 b); S7 bilobed, irregularly rounded and slightly depressed centrally,
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Euglossini |