Drepanosticta tenella Lieftinck, 1935
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5067.2.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5698917 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA87DB-FF8D-FF9F-5599-C28DFD544C64 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Drepanosticta tenella Lieftinck, 1935 |
status |
|
Drepanosticta tenella Lieftinck, 1935 View in CoL
Drepanosticta tenella: Lieftinck (1935) View in CoL : Original description of both sexes, “Gisting and environs”, Mount Tanggamus, Lampung, Sumatra, p. 7, Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ; Lieftinck (1954): Distribution (western Sumatra added without details), habitat, p 37.
Notes. Lieftinck (1935) described D. tenella View in CoL from the south of Sumatra, giving illustrations of the male anal appendages in dorsal and lateral view. Unfortunately Lieftinck’s description is made largely by comparison to the earlier published description ( Lieftinck 1929) of D. gazella Lieftinck, 1929 View in CoL from Java (which does not belong in the D. carmichaeli View in CoL -group based on the structure of its posterior pronotal lobe, also see the discussion here). Later Lieftinck (1954) added the west of Sumatra to the distribution of D. tenella View in CoL without giving any details. The illustrations of the anal appendages of D. tenella View in CoL in Lieftinck (1935) show cerci conforming to our definition of the D. carmichaeli View in CoL - group (in fact resembling those of D. wildermuthi View in CoL sp. nov., in lateral view) and also paraprocts conforming to the group, with a clear subbasal spur visible in both dorsal and lateral views. Although parts of the paraprocts are not visible in Lieftinck’s illustrations he states that they are “shaped much as in gazella View in CoL ” and the paraprocts of D. gazella View in CoL lack any character to distinguish it from the species of the D. carmichaeli View in CoL -group. The prothorax of both sexes of D. tenella View in CoL also conforms to the definition of the D. carmichaeli View in CoL -group and we therefore include it in that group. The genital ligula of D. tenella View in CoL has not been illustrated. Based on the measurements provided by Lieftinck (1935) this is the smallest member of the D. carmichaeli View in CoL -group. However these measurements are from a single population and it is very likely that greater variation would be found if additional specimens were measured.
Distribution. Indonesia (Sumatra) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 )
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Drepanosticta tenella Lieftinck, 1935
Phan, Quoc Toan, Yokoi, Naoto, Makbun, Noppadon, Joshi, Shantanu, Subramanian, K. A., Ngo, Quoc Phu & Dow, Rory A. 2021 |
D. wildermuthi
Phan & Yokoi & Makbun & Joshi & Subramanian & Ngo & Dow 2021 |
Drepanosticta tenella
: Lieftinck 1935 |
D. tenella
: Lieftinck 1935 |
D. tenella
: Lieftinck 1935 |
D. tenella
: Lieftinck 1935 |
D. tenella
: Lieftinck 1935 |
D. tenella
: Lieftinck 1935 |
D. carmichaeli
Fraser 1931 |
D. carmichaeli
Fraser 1931 |
D. carmichaeli
Fraser 1931 |
D. carmichaeli
Fraser 1931 |
D. carmichaeli
Fraser 1931 |
D. gazella
Lieftinck 1929 |
gazella
Lieftinck 1929 |
D. gazella
Lieftinck 1929 |