Nesophontes hemicingulus, Morgan & Macphee & Woods & Turvey, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090.428.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5479170 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA87B0-FFDB-FFAA-FD24-10D7FCA5FD3D |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Nesophontes hemicingulus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Nesophontes hemicingulus , new species
Figures 3–9 View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG
HOLOTYPE: UF 23295 , partial skull lacking neurocranium (fig. 3); C1–M3 present on right side, C1–M2 on left side, with partial alveoli for I2–I3. Unfortunately, the skull broke along its long axis after collection, although little bone has been lost from complementary edges. All the cranial specimens from the Cayman Islands are damaged to a greater or lesser degree, and dentitions tend to be incomplete and much worn. UF 23295 was chosen as the holotype because its teeth are on average less worn than those in comparable specimens and all cheekteeth are preserved (albeit on one side only).
TYPE LOCALITY: Patton’s Fissure, near Spot Bay on the northern coast of Cayman Brac. The holotype was recovered from layer 5 (80–100 cm below the surface), which has been radiocarbon dated on the basis of land snail shell carbonate to 11,180 ± 105 14 C yr BP (see Radiocarbon Dating).
ETYMOLOGY: Frp, Latin hemi-, “half,” and cingulus, “belt,” in reference to absence of the precingulum on all upper molars.
AGE: Late Pleistocene-Holocene (see Radiocarbon Dating).
DISTRIBUTION: Known only from Cayman Brac and Grand Cayman. This species is the only member of the genus known outside the Greater Antilles and their satellite islands.
REFERRED SPECIMENS: Cayman Brac: Patton’s Fissure: partial skulls, UF 23258, 23264, 23277, 23279, 23293–23301, 23332–23337, 23360- 23363, 23393, 23394, 23407; mandibles, UF 23241, 23242, 23245, 23251–23256, 23259, 23265–23269, 23280–23285, 23311–23313, 23324–23326, 23343, 23347–23359, 23364, 23365, 23367–23378, 23383, 23389, 23397, 23398, 23400, 23404, 23408–23417, 23421, 23426–23432, 23436, 23437, 23448–23450 (also includes a large sample of postcranial material not listed here). Pollard Bay Cave, Shearwater Cave 2. Grand Cayman: Dolphin Cave: UF 172845, right mandible with c1–m3; UF 172846, right mandible with c1–m3; UF 172863, right mandible with p2–m3; UF 172908, left mandible with p2, p4–m3; UF 172909, left mandible with c1, p2, m1–m3; UF 172910, left mandible with m1–m3; UF 172926, right mandible with m1– m2; UF 172939, partial skull lacking braincase, with right C1–M2 and left P2-M2; UF 172940, left mandible with p2, p4–m3; UF 172950, left mandible m1–m2. Barn Owl Cave: UF 23242, right mandible with p2–m3. Bodden Cave: UF 23241, right mandible with p4–m3. Furtherland Farms: UF 172803, left mandible with p2, p4– m3. Old Man Cave: UF 23245, right mandible with c1, p2, m1; UF 23246, right mandible with p2, p4–m3; UF 23247, edentulous right mandible; UF 23248, partial edentulous right mandible; UF 23249, right mandible with p2, p 4m 3; UF 23250, left mandible with p2, p4–m3; UF 23251, left mandible with p4–m3.
DIAGNOSIS: Within Nesophontes , N. hemicingulus expresses unique reductions in cingulum/ ectocingulid features on upper/lower molars. It can be distinguished in lacking precingula on all molars, attenuation of postcingula on M1 and M2, and uniform de-emphasis of ectocingulids on lower cheekteeth. Closest morphological similarities are to Cuban N. micrus in regard to tooth shape, dimensions, and discrete characters.
DESCRIPTION: In the absence of good cranial remains of Cayman nesophontids, teeth are the main source of characters (figs. 3–9). In the following set of differential diagnoses, we compare N. hemicingulus to species from the major islands on which Nesophontes formerly occurred: Puerto Rico ( N. edithae ), Cuba ( N. major , N. micrus ), and Hispaniola ( N. hypomicrus , N. paramicrus , N. zamicrus ). Hispaniolan N. paramicrus and Cuban N. micrus are very similar, and were in fact synonymized by Varona (1974) on the basis of his comparisons and those of Patterson (1962). However, these two species differ in some characters, such as the absence of a constricted infraorbital foramen in N. micrus , and for this reason are distinguished here. Cingulum/cingulid characters, the only reliably diagnostic characters for N. hemicingulus in the current hypodigm, are treated separately.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.