Lactobacillus, Beijerinck, 1901

Zheng, Jinshui, Wittouck, Stijn, Salvetti, Elisa, Franz, Charles M. A. P., Harris, Hugh M. B., Mattarelli, Paola, O’Toole, Paul W., Pot, Bruno, Vandamme, Peter, Walter, Jens, Watanabe, Koichi, Wuyts, Sander, Felis, Giovanna E., Gänzle, Michael G. & Lebeer, Sarah, 2020, A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae, International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 70, pp. 2782-2858 : 2793

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4728260

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A8D903-D204-024A-FFD0-FBFE55AA314A

treatment provided by

Valdenar (2021-04-29 20:05:09, last updated 2021-04-29 21:47:49)

scientific name

Lactobacillus
status

 

Emended description of Lactobacillus

Lactobacillus species are Gram-positive, homofermentative, thermophilic and non-spore-forming rods. Most Lactobacillus species do not ferment pentoses and none of the organisms encode genes for the pentose–phosphate pathway or pyruvate formate lyase. The emended description of the genus includes all organisms that were previously assigned to the L. delbrueckii group [ 17]. Lactobacillus species are host-adapted; the Lactobacillus melliventris clade (previously termed the Firm-5 clade) is adapted to social bees [ 52] while all other Lactobacillus species are adapted to vertebrate hosts. Lactobacillus species ferment a relatively broad spectrum of carbohydrates and have the strain-specific ability to ferment extracellular fructans, starch, or glycogen [ 53, 54]. The L. melliventris clade species also ferment a wider range of carbohydrates when compared to insect-adapted species in the genera Apilactobacillus and Bombilactobacillus . In intestinal habitats, Lactobacillus species are generally associated with heterofermentative lactobacilli. For specific examples, it was shown that co-habitation of Lactobacillus species with heterofermentative lactobacilli is based on long-term evolutionary relationships in biofilms [ 55] and a complementary preference for carbon sources [ 18, 56]. Many Lactobacillus species are able to ferment mannitol, which also reflects co-habitation with heterofermenters. The metabolic focus of L. delbrueckii on lactose [ 57] explains its dominance in yoghurt and cheese fermentations but also relates to its presence in the intestine of suckling piglets [ 54]. The genus Lactobacillus remains a relatively heterogenous genus with L. iners as the most distant member. L. iners has the smallest genome size among all Lactobacillaceae , which reflects its strict adaptation to the human vagina.

In addition to their relevance in intestinal and vaginal ecosystems, Lactobacillus species frequently occur in dairy and cereal fermentations and are widely used as starter cultures for production of fermented dairy products [ 58, 59].

A phylogenetic tree of all species in the genus Lactobacillus is provided in Fig. S6A.

The type species of the genus Lactobacillus is L. delbrueckii . Although the nomenclature of species in the emended genus Lactobacillus remains unchanged, a list of species and a list of their properties is provided below.

17. Duar RM, Lin XB, Zheng J, Martino ME, Grenier T et al. Lifestyles in transition: evolution and natural history of the genus Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2017; 41: S 27 - S 48.

18. Ganzle MG. Lactic metabolism revisited: metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Curr Opin Food Sci 2015; 2: 106 - 117.

58. Ganzle MG. Fermented Foods. In: Doyle MP, Diez Gonzalez F, Hill C (editors). Food Microbiol. Fundam. Front, 5 th ed. ASM Press; 2019. pp. 855 - 900.

59. Hutkins RW. Microbiology and technology of fermented foods, 2 nd. Chigaco, IL: IFT Press; 2019.

55. Lin XB, Wang T, Stothard P, Corander J, Wang J et al. The evolution of ecological facilitation within mixed-species biofilms in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. ISME J 2018; 12: 2770 - 2784.

52. Martinson VG, Danforth BN, Minckley RL, Rueppell O, Tingek S et al. A simple and distinctive microbiota associated with honey bees and bumble bees. Mol Ecol 2011; 20: 619 - 628.

56. Tannock GW, Wilson CM, Loach D, Cook GM, Eason J et al. Resource partitioning in relation to cohabitation of Lactobacillus species in the mouse forestomach. ISME J 2012; 6: 927 - 938.

57. van de Guchte M, Penaud S, Grimaldi C, Barbe V, Bryson K et al. The complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus bulgaricus reveals extensive and ongoing reductive evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 9274 - 9279.

53. van der Veer C, Hertzberger RY, Bruisten SM, Tytgat HLP, Swanenburg J et al. Comparative genomics of human Lactobacillus crispatus isolates reveals genes for glycosylation and glycogen degradation: implications for in vivo dominance of the vaginal microbiota. Microbiome 2019; 7: 49.

54. Wang W, Hu H, Zijlstra RT, Zheng J, Ganzle MG. Metagenomic reconstructions of gut microbial metabolism in weanling pigs. Microbiome 2019; 7: 48.